Re: 2015 Latin America Tour
Posted: Tue March 24, 2015 6:28 pm
EJ wrote:not sure that's such a great idea. pretty sure most of those SA countries have extradition agreements with the U.S.96583UP wrote:s
bring back Dave A
EJ wrote:not sure that's such a great idea. pretty sure most of those SA countries have extradition agreements with the U.S.96583UP wrote:s
bring back Dave A
ok, let me retract the the integrity comment. that's a loaded statement. i'll replace it with 'quality of musical output', which i acknowledge is a subjective statement. i'm not really trying to start an argument here.warehouse wrote:it sounds like you are comparing pearl jam to fugazi, not soundgarden. didnt cornell record an album with timbaland b/c he wanted more mainstream exposure as a recording artist? is that the kinda musical integrity that you are talking about?DeLima wrote:Heh, yup. It is an interesting comparison though...would you rather maintain a higher level of musical integrity and play to smaller audiences or vice versa.tommymtcom wrote:I'm sure their fans are perfectly happy with that.bodysnatcher wrote:Agreed. They're relevant to us. But I don't see them attracting new generations like PJ is doing.CopperTom wrote:You have a point. I was shocked how few people cared about Soundgarden at their co-headline tour with NIN last year.TouringReg wrote:Come on now. Soundgarden is like 12 months away from playing at 2pm at state fairs. People on here might like them but they are way less relevant than Pearl Jam. Have you seen some of the third rate festivals they've played in the last couple of years? Headlining a festival in Kitchener, ON? I saw them in Quebec City last summer the crowd was tiny. Check out their crowd at Pemberton on YouTube last summer, very empty.96583UP wrote:so psyched to know that this band after not playing together most of 2015 while their drummer plays and writes an album with a better band will be vacationing in brazil and making a few hundred thow at night in order to save for their childrens' future coke addictions and rehabs.
bring back Dave A
SG was always smaller than PJ, and I think they're comfortable with that. They like their status as strong influencers on other bands/Seattle pioneers and I think they feel 'famous enough'. PJ does still looks up to them, especially Eddie with the constant wearing of the nudedragons t-shirt
ThisCoach wrote:When that "tease" email came from the 10C, I was 99.9 percent sure that this was another lame tour announcement, but a small part of me had hopes that it was some kind of announcement about, ya know, actually creating new music.
Less touring, more music. Or, lay some tracks down while touring. Better yet, debut some songs you've been working on. Even better, lock Eddie up in the hotel room, and let Jeff/Stone write the new PJ album. Dubbed Ed's voice over music. Release to Target or whatever.
That's disgustingdprival78 wrote:supersonic was the b-side for the fixer single
DeLima wrote:ok, let me retract the the integrity comment. that's a loaded statement. i'll replace it with 'quality of musical output', which i acknowledge is a subjective statement. i'm not really trying to start an argument here.warehouse wrote:it sounds like you are comparing pearl jam to fugazi, not soundgarden. didnt cornell record an album with timbaland b/c he wanted more mainstream exposure as a recording artist? is that the kinda musical integrity that you are talking about?DeLima wrote:Heh, yup. It is an interesting comparison though...would you rather maintain a higher level of musical integrity and play to smaller audiences or vice versa.tommymtcom wrote:I'm sure their fans are perfectly happy with that.bodysnatcher wrote:Agreed. They're relevant to us. But I don't see them attracting new generations like PJ is doing.CopperTom wrote:You have a point. I was shocked how few people cared about Soundgarden at their co-headline tour with NIN last year.TouringReg wrote:Come on now. Soundgarden is like 12 months away from playing at 2pm at state fairs. People on here might like them but they are way less relevant than Pearl Jam. Have you seen some of the third rate festivals they've played in the last couple of years? Headlining a festival in Kitchener, ON? I saw them in Quebec City last summer the crowd was tiny. Check out their crowd at Pemberton on YouTube last summer, very empty.96583UP wrote:so psyched to know that this band after not playing together most of 2015 while their drummer plays and writes an album with a better band will be vacationing in brazil and making a few hundred thow at night in order to save for their childrens' future coke addictions and rehabs.
bring back Dave A
SG was always smaller than PJ, and I think they're comfortable with that. They like their status as strong influencers on other bands/Seattle pioneers and I think they feel 'famous enough'. PJ does still looks up to them, especially Eddie with the constant wearing of the nudedragons t-shirt
it's funny to hear the other SG guys talk about the timbaland album. i was actually having this conversation with a friend the other day and i said that one of the biggest differences is that the other SG members seem to kiss Chris's ass way less than PJ members do Eddie.
How do you feel about Euphoria Morning stip? That one's got some pretty phenomenal stuff on itstip wrote:DeLima wrote:ok, let me retract the the integrity comment. that's a loaded statement. i'll replace it with 'quality of musical output', which i acknowledge is a subjective statement. i'm not really trying to start an argument here.warehouse wrote:it sounds like you are comparing pearl jam to fugazi, not soundgarden. didnt cornell record an album with timbaland b/c he wanted more mainstream exposure as a recording artist? is that the kinda musical integrity that you are talking about?DeLima wrote:Heh, yup. It is an interesting comparison though...would you rather maintain a higher level of musical integrity and play to smaller audiences or vice versa.tommymtcom wrote:I'm sure their fans are perfectly happy with that.bodysnatcher wrote:Agreed. They're relevant to us. But I don't see them attracting new generations like PJ is doing.CopperTom wrote:You have a point. I was shocked how few people cared about Soundgarden at their co-headline tour with NIN last year.TouringReg wrote:Come on now. Soundgarden is like 12 months away from playing at 2pm at state fairs. People on here might like them but they are way less relevant than Pearl Jam. Have you seen some of the third rate festivals they've played in the last couple of years? Headlining a festival in Kitchener, ON? I saw them in Quebec City last summer the crowd was tiny. Check out their crowd at Pemberton on YouTube last summer, very empty.96583UP wrote:so psyched to know that this band after not playing together most of 2015 while their drummer plays and writes an album with a better band will be vacationing in brazil and making a few hundred thow at night in order to save for their childrens' future coke addictions and rehabs.
bring back Dave A
SG was always smaller than PJ, and I think they're comfortable with that. They like their status as strong influencers on other bands/Seattle pioneers and I think they feel 'famous enough'. PJ does still looks up to them, especially Eddie with the constant wearing of the nudedragons t-shirt
it's funny to hear the other SG guys talk about the timbaland album. i was actually having this conversation with a friend the other day and i said that one of the biggest differences is that the other SG members seem to kiss Chris's ass way less than PJ members do Eddie.
We'll really need to see how they respond to Eddie's first album with Timbaland
i still want to hear the songs he made while he was on ecstasystip wrote:DeLima wrote:ok, let me retract the the integrity comment. that's a loaded statement. i'll replace it with 'quality of musical output', which i acknowledge is a subjective statement. i'm not really trying to start an argument here.warehouse wrote:it sounds like you are comparing pearl jam to fugazi, not soundgarden. didnt cornell record an album with timbaland b/c he wanted more mainstream exposure as a recording artist? is that the kinda musical integrity that you are talking about?DeLima wrote:Heh, yup. It is an interesting comparison though...would you rather maintain a higher level of musical integrity and play to smaller audiences or vice versa.tommymtcom wrote:I'm sure their fans are perfectly happy with that.bodysnatcher wrote:Agreed. They're relevant to us. But I don't see them attracting new generations like PJ is doing.CopperTom wrote:You have a point. I was shocked how few people cared about Soundgarden at their co-headline tour with NIN last year.TouringReg wrote:Come on now. Soundgarden is like 12 months away from playing at 2pm at state fairs. People on here might like them but they are way less relevant than Pearl Jam. Have you seen some of the third rate festivals they've played in the last couple of years? Headlining a festival in Kitchener, ON? I saw them in Quebec City last summer the crowd was tiny. Check out their crowd at Pemberton on YouTube last summer, very empty.96583UP wrote:so psyched to know that this band after not playing together most of 2015 while their drummer plays and writes an album with a better band will be vacationing in brazil and making a few hundred thow at night in order to save for their childrens' future coke addictions and rehabs.
bring back Dave A
SG was always smaller than PJ, and I think they're comfortable with that. They like their status as strong influencers on other bands/Seattle pioneers and I think they feel 'famous enough'. PJ does still looks up to them, especially Eddie with the constant wearing of the nudedragons t-shirt
it's funny to hear the other SG guys talk about the timbaland album. i was actually having this conversation with a friend the other day and i said that one of the biggest differences is that the other SG members seem to kiss Chris's ass way less than PJ members do Eddie.
We'll really need to see how they respond to Eddie's first album with Timbaland