That's absurd.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Generally speaking, the fewer, the better for TV shows, though.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Oh. Maybe they did. Still weak given they will have a huge built-in audience already from TWD.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I thought TWD did 6 the first season?E.H. Ruddock wrote:So six episodes is kind of weak. Even TWD did 8 the first season, right?
TV: Fear the Walking Dead (AMC)
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84846
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: TV: Fear the Walking Dead (AMC)
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33834
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: TV: Fear the Walking Dead (AMC)
i only have a finite amount of time on this earth, joey. i don't want to spend it watching filler episodes of tv showsdurdencommatyler wrote:That's absurd.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Generally speaking, the fewer, the better for TV shows, though.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Oh. Maybe they did. Still weak given they will have a huge built-in audience already from TWD.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I thought TWD did 6 the first season?E.H. Ruddock wrote:So six episodes is kind of weak. Even TWD did 8 the first season, right?
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84846
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: TV: Fear the Walking Dead (AMC)
If the story is good, who gives a shit?LoathedVermin72 wrote:i only have a finite amount of time on this earth, joey. i don't want to spend it watching filler episodes of tv showsdurdencommatyler wrote:That's absurd.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Generally speaking, the fewer, the better for TV shows, though.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Oh. Maybe they did. Still weak given they will have a huge built-in audience already from TWD.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I thought TWD did 6 the first season?E.H. Ruddock wrote:So six episodes is kind of weak. Even TWD did 8 the first season, right?
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84846
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: TV: Fear the Walking Dead (AMC)
TV is doing more right (across the board) than film is right now. Everything should be on TV.
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35407
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: TV: Fear the Walking Dead (AMC)
durdencommatyler wrote:TV is doing more right (across the board) than film is right now. Everything should be on TV.
Correct statement.
Do you watch Hannibal?
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84846
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: TV: Fear the Walking Dead (AMC)
Not yet, unfortunately. It's on my short list.Strat wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:TV is doing more right (across the board) than film is right now. Everything should be on TV.
Correct statement.
Do you watch Hannibal?
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33834
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: TV: Fear the Walking Dead (AMC)
do i need to talk about how i don't care about story again?durdencommatyler wrote:If the story is good, who gives a shit?LoathedVermin72 wrote:i only have a finite amount of time on this earth, joey. i don't want to spend it watching filler episodes of tv showsdurdencommatyler wrote:That's absurd.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Generally speaking, the fewer, the better for TV shows, though.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Oh. Maybe they did. Still weak given they will have a huge built-in audience already from TWD.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I thought TWD did 6 the first season?E.H. Ruddock wrote:So six episodes is kind of weak. Even TWD did 8 the first season, right?
what i'm saying is that very rarely is an extended amount of episodes necessary, intuitive, or helpful to a dramatic show. it's one thing if it's totally episodic, with each episode exploring a totally new them or narrative through the same characters, but one drawn-out narrative often becomes just that over too much time.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33834
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: TV: Fear the Walking Dead (AMC)
fuck you. so much. no. just no.durdencommatyler wrote:TV is doing more right (across the board) than film is right now. Everything should be on TV.
- tommymtcom
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4306
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
- Location: there all is aching
Re: TV: Fear the Walking Dead (AMC)
He's right, LV. TV is kicking movie's ass at the moment.LoathedVermin72 wrote:fuck you. so much. no. just no.durdencommatyler wrote:TV is doing more right (across the board) than film is right now. Everything should be on TV.
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84846
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: TV: Fear the Walking Dead (AMC)
It's the objective truth, verm. If you're too fucking stupid to understand it, that's your fault.LoathedVermin72 wrote:fuck you. so much. no. just no.durdencommatyler wrote:TV is doing more right (across the board) than film is right now. Everything should be on TV.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84846
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: TV: Fear the Walking Dead (AMC)
LoathedVermin72 wrote:do i need to talk about how i don't care about story again?durdencommatyler wrote:If the story is good, who gives a shit?LoathedVermin72 wrote:i only have a finite amount of time on this earth, joey. i don't want to spend it watching filler episodes of tv showsdurdencommatyler wrote:That's absurd.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Generally speaking, the fewer, the better for TV shows, though.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Oh. Maybe they did. Still weak given they will have a huge built-in audience already from TWD.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I thought TWD did 6 the first season?E.H. Ruddock wrote:So six episodes is kind of weak. Even TWD did 8 the first season, right?
what i'm saying is that very rarely is an extended amount of episodes necessary, intuitive, or helpful to a dramatic show. it's one thing if it's totally episodic, with each episode exploring a totally new them or narrative through the same characters, but one drawn-out narrative often becomes just that over too much time.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51786
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: TV: Fear the Walking Dead (AMC)
LV, I could easily list 10 TV shows that I would rather watch than most of your (or mine) top 25 movies of the past two years.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33834
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: TV: Fear the Walking Dead (AMC)
I can't have this conversation again. I just can't do it. It's been discussed to death. Let's just leave it at I can barely even bring myself to watch ANY dramatic TV shows in today's climate, and I don't think TV as a whole is doing anything as well as movies in any way that isn't totally superficial and meretricious.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33834
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: TV: Fear the Walking Dead (AMC)
this is the dumbest post i've ever read and i assume you're trollingdurdencommatyler wrote:It's the objective truth, verm. If you're too fucking stupid to understand it, that's your fault.LoathedVermin72 wrote:fuck you. so much. no. just no.durdencommatyler wrote:TV is doing more right (across the board) than film is right now. Everything should be on TV.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33834
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: TV: Fear the Walking Dead (AMC)
What? Just an eye-roll? What the fuck is that?durdencommatyler wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:do i need to talk about how i don't care about story again?durdencommatyler wrote:If the story is good, who gives a shit?LoathedVermin72 wrote:i only have a finite amount of time on this earth, joey. i don't want to spend it watching filler episodes of tv showsdurdencommatyler wrote:That's absurd.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Generally speaking, the fewer, the better for TV shows, though.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Oh. Maybe they did. Still weak given they will have a huge built-in audience already from TWD.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I thought TWD did 6 the first season?E.H. Ruddock wrote:So six episodes is kind of weak. Even TWD did 8 the first season, right?
what i'm saying is that very rarely is an extended amount of episodes necessary, intuitive, or helpful to a dramatic show. it's one thing if it's totally episodic, with each episode exploring a totally new them or narrative through the same characters, but one drawn-out narrative often becomes just that over too much time.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84846
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: TV: Fear the Walking Dead (AMC)
Not at all. It's just in conflict with your own opinion. So you're being a shithead about it. There is literally not a film out there I would rather watch than anything in the movie theaters right now.LoathedVermin72 wrote:this is the dumbest post i've ever read and i assume you're trollingdurdencommatyler wrote:It's the objective truth, verm. If you're too fucking stupid to understand it, that's your fault.LoathedVermin72 wrote:fuck you. so much. no. just no.durdencommatyler wrote:TV is doing more right (across the board) than film is right now. Everything should be on TV.
TV is by far and away the superior medium.
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: TV: Fear the Walking Dead (AMC)
Nobody knows what that word means.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I can't have this conversation again. I just can't do it. It's been discussed to death. Let's just leave it at I can barely even bring myself to watch ANY dramatic TV shows in today's climate, and I don't think TV as a whole is doing anything as well as movies in any way that isn't totally superficial and meretricious.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33834
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: TV: Fear the Walking Dead (AMC)
Dude. No medium can ever be "objectively" better than any other. We're talking about art, here. This is all subjective. And I really hope you're trolling by saying I'm just "too stupid" to understand, because based on our previous discussions, I don't think you actually consider me stupid or a shithead.durdencommatyler wrote:Not at all. It's just in conflict with your own opinion. So you're being a shithead about it. There is literally not a film out there I would rather watch than anything in the movie theaters right now.LoathedVermin72 wrote:this is the dumbest post i've ever read and i assume you're trollingdurdencommatyler wrote:It's the objective truth, verm. If you're too fucking stupid to understand it, that's your fault.LoathedVermin72 wrote:fuck you. so much. no. just no.durdencommatyler wrote:TV is doing more right (across the board) than film is right now. Everything should be on TV.
TV is by far and away the superior medium.
Last edited by LoathedVermin72 on Tue June 09, 2015 8:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33834
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: TV: Fear the Walking Dead (AMC)
www.justfuckinggoogleit.comKaius wrote:Nobody knows what that word means.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I can't have this conversation again. I just can't do it. It's been discussed to death. Let's just leave it at I can barely even bring myself to watch ANY dramatic TV shows in today's climate, and I don't think TV as a whole is doing anything as well as movies in any way that isn't totally superficial and meretricious.
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: TV: Fear the Walking Dead (AMC)
Let me just get out my thesaurus.LoathedVermin72 wrote:http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.comKaius wrote:Nobody knows what that word means.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I can't have this conversation again. I just can't do it. It's been discussed to death. Let's just leave it at I can barely even bring myself to watch ANY dramatic TV shows in today's climate, and I don't think TV as a whole is doing anything as well as movies in any way that isn't totally superficial and meretricious.