dimejinky99 wrote:Can I ask wtf is the point of this if you're gonna give them advance warning?
Yeah, that's pretty dumb.
Re: Russia
Posted: Mon October 17, 2016 4:03 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
guys, it is all just BS, sending "warnings" to the other publicly.
Re: Russia
Posted: Mon October 17, 2016 7:58 pm
by jwfocker
Sounds like something that would happen before a huge bar fight takes place. You know, put a warning out hoping to provoke something, maybe cause a scene and a get a crowd gathered to watch but either way you're going in with a hay-maker punch.
Re: Russia
Posted: Mon October 17, 2016 9:20 pm
by Electromatic
E.H. Ruddock wrote:guys, it is all just BS, sending "warnings" to the other publicly.
I wonder how much money has been wasted since say 1945 on nonsensical pissing contests by global military powers....
Re: Russia
Posted: Mon October 17, 2016 9:26 pm
by BurtReynolds
What was going on with Assange yesterday? Sounds like something's about to happen.
Re: Russia
Posted: Mon October 17, 2016 11:03 pm
by dimejinky99
Electromatic wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:guys, it is all just BS, sending "warnings" to the other publicly.
I wonder how much money has been wasted since say 1945 on nonsensical pissing contests by global military powers....
Replace money with lives and you're onto something.
Re: Russia
Posted: Mon December 19, 2016 8:47 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
Re: Russia
Posted: Mon December 19, 2016 8:57 pm
by Norah
that pic takes me back
Re: Russia
Posted: Mon December 19, 2016 9:12 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
yeah it does
Re: Russia
Posted: Tue December 20, 2016 2:28 am
by Bi_3
I find it funny that after all the complaints about fake news and Russian propaganda, here's CNN reposting from RT and Sputnik on the superiority of a Russian jet.
The FBI Never Asked For Access To Hacked Computer Servers
The FBI has instead relied on computer forensics from a third-party tech security company, CrowdStrike
Is this the normal progression of things for a computer investigation?
Re: Russia
Posted: Thu January 05, 2017 4:51 am
by BurtReynolds
Crowdstrike is owned by a Russian expat. That's odd.
Re: Russia
Posted: Fri January 06, 2017 2:42 pm
by McParadigm
Crowdstrike has had quite a few government cyber security consultant gigs. They were the firm brought in to investigate potential Russian hacking of Ukrainian artillery recently.
I have a feeling the desire to use a firm instead of an FBI investigation was more about the required transparency of findings, and an initial hope that they could still damage control this away without a lot of public line-of-sight. Classic stupid democrats...the emails themselves were boring as hell, but the party reaction to the leaks was to make themselves look shady, bitter, and stupid.
Re: Russia
Posted: Tue January 10, 2017 1:00 pm
by dimejinky99
Worth watching.
Re: Russia
Posted: Tue January 10, 2017 2:22 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
I can confirm, in fact, that is not worth watching, dime. It is just some dude rambling on. And man what an awful public speaker that guy is.
Re: Russia
Posted: Tue January 10, 2017 5:02 pm
by dimejinky99
Well there's more than just one side to every story and we don't seem to be listening to the other side much. Who doesn't switch off when Putin starts talking? Perhaps there's good reasons for his insecure macho bullshit. I found this to be a good window into the posturing he gets accused of.