Re: The NFL and Los Angeles
Posted: Wed January 13, 2016 2:12 am
The more I read about it, the more I think the Chargers really can't stay in S.D. It really doesn't make financial sense for them.
Ouch.turned2black wrote:Holy shit! This San Antonio Raiders thing might actually happen.
send 'em to LondonGreen Habit wrote:Ouch.turned2black wrote:Holy shit! This San Antonio Raiders thing might actually happen.
That's something that's existed for years for historical purposes. The Raiders also have one as well.Simple Torture wrote:NFL.com has already switched the Rams page...that was quick: http://www.nfl.com/teams/losangelesrams/roster?team=RAM
god that'd be perfectdoug rr wrote:send 'em to LondonGreen Habit wrote:Ouch.turned2black wrote:Holy shit! This San Antonio Raiders thing might actually happen.
spike wrote:god that'd be perfectdoug rr wrote:send 'em to LondonGreen Habit wrote:Ouch.turned2black wrote:Holy shit! This San Antonio Raiders thing might actually happen.
I guess you're referring to this: Even if there is a relocation fee, it would surely be much less than the $550M estimated for LA. Enticing indeed.turned2black wrote:Apparently the NFL would waive relocation fees if Davis moved to S.A. That's gotta be enticing for Davis.
I guess that's because he'd have to move into the Alamodome while working out logistics for a permanent home between Austin and S.A.
I think Bob McNair would be even more unhappier. At least Jerry has a national following to back him up in case he loses a few fans in Texas.turned2black wrote:I'm guessing Jerry wouldn't be happy.
As I figured, the Broncos likely agreed.durdencommatyler wrote:Surely, they'd move the Chargers out of the AFC West right? The rivalry with Denver and KC is too big to eliminate.Green Habit wrote:I'm torn on this--I want the Raiders out the Bay Area, but I also do not want them to leave the AFC West.Simple Torture wrote:So how many teams will be in LA next year? I'm thinking two--the NFL will somehow try to keep the Rams in St. Louis, but will happily move the other 2.
I would guess there are very few Texans fans in San Antonio. I lived there in the Warren Moon Oilers days and there were virtually no Oilers fans. It was all Cowboys and Raiders.Green Habit wrote:I think Bob McNair would be even more unhappier. At least Jerry has a national following to back him up in case he loses a few fans in Texas.turned2black wrote:I'm guessing Jerry wouldn't be happy.
Unless the Seahawks win the Super Bowl, Seahawks at Rams seems to be perfect for the late MNF game that Western teams always get stuck in.swan wrote:As an SC alum, the idea of going to see a real NFL game in the Coliseum is kinda fun. Hopefully I can get down there when the Seabags visit. Pete Carroll back on the sideline in the Coliseum will be cool.
Green Habit wrote:Unless the Seahawks win the Super Bowl, Seahawks at Rams seems to be perfect for the late MNF game that Western teams always get stuck in.swan wrote:As an SC alum, the idea of going to see a real NFL game in the Coliseum is kinda fun. Hopefully I can get down there when the Seabags visit. Pete Carroll back on the sideline in the Coliseum will be cool.
san diego does have good fans but only 1/3 of them show up to games...every road team that plays there is basically a home game for themBammer wrote:I like this move by the Rams to L.A.
Good for the Seahawks = Shorter road trip.
Good for me = I like having another excuse to visit friends down there.
Bad for St. Louis? = Too bad, that fucking stadium sucks.
I don't quite understand the need for the Chargers to move, though. From everything I can tell they have great fans, and what is wrong with San Diego?
As for the Raiders... I'd GTFO of Oakland as soon as possible under any circumstances whatsoever.