Im really wanting to see it again, just don't wanna pay $12 to see it, maybe will see it in a couple of months at the dollar theaterdurdencommatyler wrote:I really liked this thing. Had a blast. Totally invested from first frame to last.
Movie: Star Trek: Into Darkness (5-17-13)
- Dr. Van Nostrand
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8898
- Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm
Re: Movie: Star Trek: Into Darkness (5-17-13)
- Rangi Guy
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9429
- Joined: Fri March 22, 2013 7:20 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/MistorKitty
- Location: 41.1716° S, 174.8248° E
Re: Movie: Star Trek: Into Darkness (5-17-13)
What is this dollar theater you speak of???Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:Im really wanting to see it again, just don't wanna pay $12 to see it, maybe will see it in a couple of months at the dollar theaterdurdencommatyler wrote:I really liked this thing. Had a blast. Totally invested from first frame to last.
"I really enjoy sandwiches but the other guys are so good at making sandwiches that I don't make them. Now I make sandwiches."
- Dr. Van Nostrand
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8898
- Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm
Re: Movie: Star Trek: Into Darkness (5-17-13)
We have a theater that gets movies after they have cooled off at the box office, basically somewhere before they come out on dvd and once upon a time it was just a dollar to see the movies, its 3 bucks now i think but people still call it the dollar theaterRangi Guy wrote:What is this dollar theater you speak of???Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:Im really wanting to see it again, just don't wanna pay $12 to see it, maybe will see it in a couple of months at the dollar theaterdurdencommatyler wrote:I really liked this thing. Had a blast. Totally invested from first frame to last.
- Rangi Guy
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9429
- Joined: Fri March 22, 2013 7:20 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/MistorKitty
- Location: 41.1716° S, 174.8248° E
Re: Movie: Star Trek: Into Darkness (5-17-13)
Wish we had something like that around here. We only seem to get free or cheap screenings of anything around Lord of The Rings release time....Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:We have a theater that gets movies after they have cooled off at the box office, basically somewhere before they come out on dvd and once upon a time it was just a dollar to see the movies, its 3 bucks now i think but people still call it the dollar theaterRangi Guy wrote:What is this dollar theater you speak of???Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:Im really wanting to see it again, just don't wanna pay $12 to see it, maybe will see it in a couple of months at the dollar theaterdurdencommatyler wrote:I really liked this thing. Had a blast. Totally invested from first frame to last.
"I really enjoy sandwiches but the other guys are so good at making sandwiches that I don't make them. Now I make sandwiches."
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Movie: Star Trek: Into Darkness (5-17-13)
Looks like Kurtzman and Orci will be returning to pen Star Trek for a third time. But Lindelof is out.
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=107395
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=107395
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Movie: Star Trek: Into Darkness (5-17-13)
Still in the hands of the creative team that brought you Hercules.
Ironically, the whole reason they took the risk of killing Spock in the early 80's and creating the original Khan movie storyline was that they had a Star Trek movie out, it had turned out to be a box office success, but audiences were hit-and-miss in their reaction to it. What are the odds that "creating a new and interesting story" is at the top of the to-do list in response to Into Darkness?
Ironically, the whole reason they took the risk of killing Spock in the early 80's and creating the original Khan movie storyline was that they had a Star Trek movie out, it had turned out to be a box office success, but audiences were hit-and-miss in their reaction to it. What are the odds that "creating a new and interesting story" is at the top of the to-do list in response to Into Darkness?
(patriotic choking noises)
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Movie: Star Trek: Into Darkness (5-17-13)
I would imagine its top priority. But ending Into Darkness the way they did really sets that up, too. They can (and SHOULD) finally go full force into new territory. Their reboot/alt timeline concept was genius. Now it's time to take it someone entirely new.McParadigm wrote:Still in the hands of the creative team that brought you Hercules.
Ironically, the whole reason they took the risk of killing Spock in the early 80's and creating the original Khan movie storyline was that they had a Star Trek movie out, it had turned out to be a box office success, but audiences were hit-and-miss in their reaction to it. What are the odds that "creating a new and interesting story" is at the top of the to-do list in response to Into Darkness?
And this coming from a guy who loved both of the new films.
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42771
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Movie: Star Trek: Into Darkness (5-17-13)
The alt timeline was a really good way of doing a reboot. Very classy.durdencommatyler wrote:I would imagine its top priority. But ending Into Darkness the way they did really sets that up, too. They can (and SHOULD) finally go full force into new territory. Their reboot/alt timeline concept was genius. Now it's time to take it someone entirely new.McParadigm wrote:Still in the hands of the creative team that brought you Hercules.
Ironically, the whole reason they took the risk of killing Spock in the early 80's and creating the original Khan movie storyline was that they had a Star Trek movie out, it had turned out to be a box office success, but audiences were hit-and-miss in their reaction to it. What are the odds that "creating a new and interesting story" is at the top of the to-do list in response to Into Darkness?
And this coming from a guy who loved both of the new films.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Movie: Star Trek: Into Darkness (5-17-13)
Totally agree. And I hope they continue to make little references to that. But I hope the next movie is a completely original storyline. i don't want to see them, for example, travel around the sun and back in time to save Shark Week or anything like that.VinylGuy wrote:The alt timeline was a really good way of doing a reboot. Very classy.durdencommatyler wrote:I would imagine its top priority. But ending Into Darkness the way they did really sets that up, too. They can (and SHOULD) finally go full force into new territory. Their reboot/alt timeline concept was genius. Now it's time to take it someone entirely new.McParadigm wrote:Still in the hands of the creative team that brought you Hercules.
Ironically, the whole reason they took the risk of killing Spock in the early 80's and creating the original Khan movie storyline was that they had a Star Trek movie out, it had turned out to be a box office success, but audiences were hit-and-miss in their reaction to it. What are the odds that "creating a new and interesting story" is at the top of the to-do list in response to Into Darkness?
And this coming from a guy who loved both of the new films.
- Stickman
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 10264
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:41 am
- Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Re: Movie: Star Trek: Into Darkness (5-17-13)
R2?


"I'll hold your wallet while you go fuck yourself"-David Letterman
- red calzolaio
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1478
- Joined: Fri January 25, 2013 4:02 am
Re: Movie: Star Trek: Into Darkness (5-17-13)
Yep.Stickman wrote:R2?
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42771
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Movie: Star Trek: Into Darkness (5-17-13)
Thats awesome.red calzolaio wrote:Yep.Stickman wrote:R2?
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
- Dr. Van Nostrand
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8898
- Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm
Re: Movie: Star Trek: Into Darkness (5-17-13)
Is that a screen shot from the movie? Which part? I just picked up the blue ray, ill have to keep an eye out for itVinylGuy wrote:Thats awesome.red calzolaio wrote:Yep.Stickman wrote:R2?
- Rangi Guy
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9429
- Joined: Fri March 22, 2013 7:20 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/MistorKitty
- Location: 41.1716° S, 174.8248° E
Re: Movie: Star Trek: Into Darkness (5-17-13)
Why would he do that again?Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:Is that a screen shot from the movie? Which part? I just picked up the blue ray, ill have to keep an eye out for itVinylGuy wrote:Thats awesome.red calzolaio wrote:Yep.Stickman wrote:R2?
"I really enjoy sandwiches but the other guys are so good at making sandwiches that I don't make them. Now I make sandwiches."
- broken iris
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2868
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:24 pm
- Location: Death Machine Inc's HQ
Re: Movie: Star Trek: Into Darkness (5-17-13)
This was better than I had been led to believe.
the sentinel remains vigilant
- Stickman
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 10264
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:41 am
- Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Re: Movie: Star Trek: Into Darkness (5-17-13)
around the 1-hour 17-minute markDr. Van Nostrand wrote:Is that a screen shot from the movie? Which part? I just picked up the blue ray, ill have to keep an eye out for itVinylGuy wrote:Thats awesome.red calzolaio wrote:Yep.Stickman wrote:R2?
"I'll hold your wallet while you go fuck yourself"-David Letterman
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Movie: Star Trek: Into Darkness (5-17-13)
I enjoy the underlying implication that the action sequences in this movie are not disparate or distinct enough from one another to be able to ascertain where this still came from.Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:Is that a screen shot from the movie? Which part? I just picked up the blue ray, ill have to keep an eye out for it
(patriotic choking noises)
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Movie: Star Trek: Into Darkness (5-17-13)
I'm sitting down to watch this again.
Here's one of the things that has always really bugged me about star trek. Why the hell does the captain of the Enterprise personally go on any of these missions, and why does the ship's doctor come with him? No wonder the entire fleet/command gets blown up in every movie. They're all morons.
Here's one of the things that has always really bugged me about star trek. Why the hell does the captain of the Enterprise personally go on any of these missions, and why does the ship's doctor come with him? No wonder the entire fleet/command gets blown up in every movie. They're all morons.
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Movie: Star Trek: Into Darkness (5-17-13)
i really love the actor playing kirk
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His