Re: Song of the Moment: Last Exit
Posted: Sat December 28, 2013 12:06 pm
What word should rise from its ashes, harmless?
This is... what?harmless wrote:'Rock 'n Roll', as far as I know, should be restricted to the 50's and, I guess, some of the 60's.
this is harmless posting while drinking?theplatypus wrote:This is... what?harmless wrote:'Rock 'n Roll', as far as I know, should be restricted to the 50's and, I guess, some of the 60's.
I was perfectly sober and stand by the comment.warehouse wrote:this is harmless posting while drinking?theplatypus wrote:This is... what?harmless wrote:'Rock 'n Roll', as far as I know, should be restricted to the 50's and, I guess, some of the 60's.
I don't see anything in that article that says the descriptor "rock and roll" should be restricted to the 50s and 60s. The term "rock and roll" became "rock" in the general lexicon, but it's just a variant. Plenty of people describe a lot of music that doesn't sound like Bill Haley and the Comets as "rock and roll", and they're not wrong. And if you want to go by Wikipedia's word, then http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ro ... oll_albumsharmless wrote:"Beyond simply a musical style, rock and roll, as seen in movies and on television, influenced lifestyles, fashion, attitudes, and language. It went on to spawn various sub-genres, often without the initially characteristic backbeat, that are now more commonly called simply "rock music" or "rock"."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_and_roll
The letter "A" sucks rocks.theplatypus wrote:I don't see anything in that article that says the descriptor "rock and roll" should be restricted to the 50s and 60s. The term "rock and roll" became "rock" in the general lexicon, but it's just a variant. Plenty of people describe a lot of music that doesn't sound like Bill Haley and the Comets as "rock and roll", and they're not wrong. And if you want to go by Wikipedia's word, then http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ro ... oll_albumsharmless wrote:"Beyond simply a musical style, rock and roll, as seen in movies and on television, influenced lifestyles, fashion, attitudes, and language. It went on to spawn various sub-genres, often without the initially characteristic backbeat, that are now more commonly called simply "rock music" or "rock"."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_and_roll
The Wikipedia entry is quite clear that 'rock and roll' was the route of various styles of 'rock'. My opinion is that describing anything that is 'rock' as 'rock and roll' is really fucking annoying, not 'wrong'. It's colloquial, sure, but it's also inaccurate. I'm not saying that I always agree with Wikipedia, but my opinion isn't exactly way outside the boundaries of typical. People can call whatever they want whatever they want, though, I won't stop them.theplatypus wrote:I don't see anything in that article that says the descriptor "rock and roll" should be restricted to the 50s and 60s. The term "rock and roll" became "rock" in the general lexicon, but it's just a variant. Plenty of people describe a lot of music that doesn't sound like Bill Haley and the Comets as "rock and roll", and they're not wrong. And if you want to go by Wikipedia's word, then http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ro ... oll_albumsharmless wrote:"Beyond simply a musical style, rock and roll, as seen in movies and on television, influenced lifestyles, fashion, attitudes, and language. It went on to spawn various sub-genres, often without the initially characteristic backbeat, that are now more commonly called simply "rock music" or "rock"."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_and_roll


stip wrote:It's not cringe worthy, at least!