Red Mosquito

zeb wrote:I agree with Charlie, you definitely want one of the RX-100s, probably the II.

Alright we've swung this way. Why the II and not the III?

The grab-ability and portability wins out. Also, the shots you guys have posted strongly support the RX 100.

The III is more expensive and only really adds a viewfinder, which may not be a deal breaker either way but there's not point in paying for one if it's not important. From what I've been reading the IQ is pretty much the same on both models.

You can find good comparisons here and here.

Cheers Zeb. The II seems fine for me but we'll see when we're in store.

Happy purchasing/shooting!

turned2black wrote:Thanks, Argo.

Are you still shooting? I remember seeing your stuff on the old board.

Not so much. I really should, though.

zeb wrote:Happy purchasing/shooting!

All good plans.....

with


Budget blown but a happy wife. It reminds her of the camera she had 15 years ago. It's a cracker.
http://www.olympus.com.au/Products/Comp ... E-M10.aspx
http://www.olympus.com.au/Products/Comp ... -f1-8.aspx

Damn good thing I didn't just purchase a Canon DSLR or a RX100 as she really didn't like the feel of them. The Olympus can be on auto control or manual without using a menu.

The other camera she liked was the Sony Alpha ILCE 6000. This camera had a few tasty features but didn't feel as right as the Olympus.

That one scratches me right where I itch.

LetMeSleep wrote:Budget blown but a happy wife. It reminds her of the camera she had 15 years ago. It's a cracker.

The OMDs review very well and look beautiful. You guys made a great choice.

turned2black wrote:

There is some real weight in this one, Charlie. Good capture.

Thanks, J.

turned2black wrote:

awesome!

Thanks, bmac.