cutuphalfdead wrote:Yeah but in MLB if you win a weak division you don't get fast tracked to the final round.
Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: JENNY LEWIS HITMEN WIN!
- The Argonaut
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11808
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
- Location: in the air tonight
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
But Option A is fairer for everyone, because
Please consider voting for me
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
Sounds like a recipe for a boring World Series.The Argonaut wrote:I think a winners division would comprise Lament, skitch, chud, and numbers. The losers division would be the rest of us schmucks. Might actually be a good opportunity to give us schmucks a better chance.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
Only reason I want b is more games
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
It's only a 4 game difference.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
Don't care. Moar games moar bettercutuphalfdead wrote:It's only a 4 game difference.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
Welp, enjoy the four game WS with a team that has no business being there.
- The Argonaut
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11808
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
- Location: in the air tonight
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
Option A has more games because of the playoff between teams two and three
Please consider voting for me
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
- Lament
- Commissioner
- Posts: 11792
- Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
I'm off to work. Skip me when you get to me (unless lenny wants to make my round 24 pick for me...but he's not allowed to pick a pitcher).
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
- The Argonaut
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11808
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
- Location: in the air tonight
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 22 - TBAMTS
And this vote doesn't count because it's really for something more like an Option C, which isn't even an option. CopperTom was just making shit upCopperTom wrote:I'd prefer Option B with 4 playoff teams.
Please consider voting for me
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
And it's an even worse suggestion.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
cutuphalfdead wrote:Welp, enjoy the four game WS with a team that has no business being there.
Good team should probably be able to win a C's series
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 22 - TBAMTS
Lament wrote:Also, we never discussed the playoff/schedule format I had proposed earlier...
Option A: Everyone plays everyone else eight times (56 games). Second place plays third place for the right to face first place in the World Series. Three-game series the first two times through the schedule, followed by two game series the last time through.
Option B: Two four team divisions. You play your division twelve times each, and the other division six times each (60 games). Division winners face each in the World Series. We can assemble the divisions randomly, geographically, thematically, etc. Three game series everyday.
I'm good with whichever one you guys decide on.
Lets go option A, but go 4 game series the last time through (2 home, 2 away). This solves the more games problem.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- The Argonaut
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11808
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
- Location: in the air tonight
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
The more games problem isn't really a problem, though.
Please consider voting for me
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
The Argonaut wrote:The more games problem isn't really a problem, though.
I know. I just like games. They're fun.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- CopperTom
- Champion of RM
- Posts: 10760
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:19 pm
- Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 22 - TBAMTS
Moar games moar better.The Argonaut wrote:And this vote doesn't count because it's really for something more like an Option C, which isn't even an option. CopperTom was just making shit upCopperTom wrote:I'd prefer Option B with 4 playoff teams.
emanon wrote:I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.
- CopperTom
- Champion of RM
- Posts: 10760
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:19 pm
- Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
Option A and Option B could very well have the same 2 teams in the WS. Relax.cutuphalfdead wrote:Welp, enjoy the four game WS with a team that has no business being there.
emanon wrote:I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.
- CopperTom
- Champion of RM
- Posts: 10760
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:19 pm
- Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
Here's an idea for the division split:
The 1st, 3rd, 6th and 8th Payroll in one division (1 + 3 + 6 + 8 = 18). The 2nd, 4th, 5th and 7th Payroll in the other division (2 + 4 + 5 + 7 = 18). Payroll is the most objective measure of "best" in What If. Is there any other idea to ensure "equal" divisions?
The 1st, 3rd, 6th and 8th Payroll in one division (1 + 3 + 6 + 8 = 18). The 2nd, 4th, 5th and 7th Payroll in the other division (2 + 4 + 5 + 7 = 18). Payroll is the most objective measure of "best" in What If. Is there any other idea to ensure "equal" divisions?
emanon wrote:I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
I think we should all rank the rosters and then take 2,4,6 and Chud into one division. Then we can trash talk and remove all objectivity for the sake of fun.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- The Argonaut
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11808
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
- Location: in the air tonight
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
There is no good way to split divisions. Option A it is
Please consider voting for me