Page 31 of 67
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
Posted: Sat November 12, 2016 10:07 pm
by The Argonaut
But Option A is fairer for everyone, because
cutuphalfdead wrote:Yeah but in MLB if you win a weak division you don't get fast tracked to the final round.
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
Posted: Sat November 12, 2016 10:07 pm
by Norah
The Argonaut wrote:I think a winners division would comprise Lament, skitch, chud, and numbers. The losers division would be the rest of us schmucks. Might actually be a good opportunity to give us schmucks a better chance.
Sounds like a recipe for a boring World Series.
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
Posted: Sat November 12, 2016 10:15 pm
by @SkitchP
Only reason I want b is more games
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
Posted: Sat November 12, 2016 10:16 pm
by Norah
It's only a 4 game difference.
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
Posted: Sat November 12, 2016 10:18 pm
by @SkitchP
cutuphalfdead wrote:It's only a 4 game difference.
Don't care. Moar games moar better
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
Posted: Sat November 12, 2016 10:19 pm
by Norah
Welp, enjoy the four game WS with a team that has no business being there.
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
Posted: Sat November 12, 2016 10:26 pm
by The Argonaut
Option A has more games because of the playoff between teams two and three
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
Posted: Sat November 12, 2016 10:27 pm
by Norah
yeah!
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
Posted: Sat November 12, 2016 10:28 pm
by Lament
I'm off to work. Skip me when you get to me (unless lenny wants to make my round 24 pick for me...but he's not allowed to pick a pitcher).
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 22 - TBAMTS
Posted: Sat November 12, 2016 10:28 pm
by The Argonaut
CopperTom wrote:I'd prefer Option B with 4 playoff teams.
And this vote doesn't count because it's really for something more like an Option C, which isn't even an option. CopperTom was just making shit up
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
Posted: Sat November 12, 2016 10:30 pm
by Norah
And it's an even worse suggestion.
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
Posted: Sat November 12, 2016 10:32 pm
by @SkitchP
cutuphalfdead wrote:Welp, enjoy the four game WS with a team that has no business being there.
Good team should probably be able to win a C's series
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 22 - TBAMTS
Posted: Sat November 12, 2016 10:57 pm
by @SkitchP
Lament wrote:Also, we never discussed the playoff/schedule format I had proposed earlier...
Option A: Everyone plays everyone else eight times (56 games). Second place plays third place for the right to face first place in the World Series. Three-game series the first two times through the schedule, followed by two game series the last time through.
Option B: Two four team divisions. You play your division twelve times each, and the other division six times each (60 games). Division winners face each in the World Series. We can assemble the divisions randomly, geographically, thematically, etc. Three game series everyday.
I'm good with whichever one you guys decide on.
Lets go option A, but go 4 game series the last time through (2 home, 2 away). This solves the more games problem.
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
Posted: Sat November 12, 2016 11:00 pm
by The Argonaut
The more games problem isn't really a problem, though.
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
Posted: Sat November 12, 2016 11:00 pm
by @SkitchP
The Argonaut wrote:The more games problem isn't really a problem, though.
I know. I just like games. They're fun.
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 22 - TBAMTS
Posted: Sat November 12, 2016 11:15 pm
by CopperTom
The Argonaut wrote:CopperTom wrote:I'd prefer Option B with 4 playoff teams.
And this vote doesn't count because it's really for something more like an Option C, which isn't even an option. CopperTom was just making shit up
Moar games moar better.
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
Posted: Sat November 12, 2016 11:21 pm
by CopperTom
cutuphalfdead wrote:Welp, enjoy the four game WS with a team that has no business being there.
Option A and Option B could very well have the same 2 teams in the WS. Relax.
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
Posted: Sat November 12, 2016 11:43 pm
by CopperTom
Here's an idea for the division split:
The 1st, 3rd, 6th and 8th Payroll in one division (1 + 3 + 6 + 8 = 18). The 2nd, 4th, 5th and 7th Payroll in the other division (2 + 4 + 5 + 7 = 18). Payroll is the most objective measure of "best" in What If. Is there any other idea to ensure "equal" divisions?
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
Posted: Sun November 13, 2016 12:07 am
by @SkitchP
I think we should all rank the rosters and then take 2,4,6 and Chud into one division. Then we can trash talk and remove all objectivity for the sake of fun.
Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: Round 24 - phil
Posted: Sun November 13, 2016 12:11 am
by The Argonaut
There is no good way to split divisions. Option A it is