Red Mosquito

KENNETH!

i wonder how much priebus knows and how long it will take him to rat out trump to mueller

I'm kinda surprised at all the outrage over his lack of condemnation over the weekend. He ran his whole fucking campaign on white supremacy.

And his "additional comments" mean less than nothing as long as Bannon is still one of his top advisers.

The US is really my home.

I believe that most Americans will side with the best of American values rather than hate.

Supergirl, you'll be my super model, although your pants're around your ankles.

bart wrote:Man, Trump really is the best thing to happen to Dan Rather since JFK got shot.

would you prefer he make a statement supporting trump's comments? Or not remark about it at all?

what would be least likely to elicit a response from you?

Trump retweeted a Fox story of his potential pardon of Joe Arpaio this morning.

Which makes it a good time to share this:

Most telling representation I've seen of a trend that has a lot more implications for president and party than the simpler, broader number reveals

McParadigm wrote:

White House says that it was "inadvertent."

I think that's just meant to represent CNN as an institution, not a "CNN journalist". Still dopey and very inappropriate (especially in light of Charlottesville), but that's who we're dealing with.

theplatypus wrote:I think that's just meant to represent CNN as an institution, not a "CNN journalist". Still dopey and very inappropriate (especially in light of Charlottesville), but that's who we're dealing with.

Yeah, I think calling that a journalist is going a bit too far. But that'll still be an interesting entry in the ol' presidential library.

Simple Torture wrote:

theplatypus wrote:I think that's just meant to represent CNN as an institution, not a "CNN journalist". Still dopey and very inappropriate (especially in light of Charlottesville), but that's who we're dealing with.

Yeah, I think calling that a journalist is going a bit too far. But that'll still be an interesting entry in the ol' presidential library.

But it was deleted.

Which brings up the whole "it's Presidential record, you're not supposed to be deleting things!"

theplatypus wrote:I think that's just meant to represent CNN as an institution, not a "CNN journalist". Still dopey and very inappropriate (especially in light of Charlottesville), but that's who we're dealing with.

I disagree that the difference is significant, especially in light of reporting on how fringe members of his base have been harassing and threatening reporters and their families.

JOBS

It's amazing that Donald Trump can become more despicable by the day.

Mike Holden‏
@MikeHolden42
Following
More
I'm announcing my retirement from Twitter. I'll never top this RT.

McParadigm wrote:

JOBS

I was outraged until he said that. Now everything is cool again.

Simple Torture wrote:

theplatypus wrote:I think that's just meant to represent CNN as an institution, not a "CNN journalist". Still dopey and very inappropriate (especially in light of Charlottesville), but that's who we're dealing with.

Yeah, I think calling that a journalist is going a bit too far. But that'll still be an interesting entry in the ol' presidential library.

You know who represents CNN as an institution? Their journalists.

McParadigm wrote:

theplatypus wrote:I think that's just meant to represent CNN as an institution, not a "CNN journalist". Still dopey and very inappropriate (especially in light of Charlottesville), but that's who we're dealing with.

I disagree that the difference is significant, especially in light of reporting on how fringe members of his base have been harassing and threatening reporters and their families.

exactly