What movies are you watching?

Post by **Jorge** » Wed February 18, 2015 1:14 am

DON'T SAY THAT YOU LOVE ME

Kaius · Post by **Kaius** » Wed February 18, 2015 4:15 am

Well, I wasn't expecting to see Tom Hardy's penis tonight, but I did.

BurtReynolds · Post by **BurtReynolds** » Wed February 18, 2015 4:16 am

Kaius wrote:Well, I wasn't expecting to see Tom Hardy's penis tonight, but I did.

congrats!

Kaius · Post by **Kaius** » Wed February 18, 2015 4:28 am

By the end, I was convinced that the main point of the film was an inside joke by the director to get slow motion shots of dick flopping around within the context of violence.

Post by **Jorge** » Thu February 19, 2015 7:44 am

WITH TONIGHT'S SCREENING OF WHIPLASH I AM FINALLY ALL CAUGHT UP WITH THE ACADEMY AWARD BEST PICTURE NOMINEES. A RATHER MEAGER BATCH IF YOU ASK ME

Post by **epilogue** » Thu February 19, 2015 7:45 pm

I really enjoyed The Theory of Everything. Like, a lot more than I was expecting. Eddie Redmayne absolutely deserves the statue.

Post by **Jorge** » Thu February 19, 2015 8:03 pm

THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING IS AN IMPRESSIVELY ACTED PIECE OF SHIT. THE PERFORMANCE MAY DESERVE ACKNOWLEDGMENT BUT THAT WEAK-ASS TV-MOVIE DOESN'T

Post by **epilogue** » Thu February 19, 2015 8:18 pm

Excellent direction, art direction, make-up and scoring. There's a lot to love about the movie. The direction blew me away.

Dev · Post by **Dev** » Fri February 20, 2015 7:28 am

ok grandma

Post by **epilogue** » Fri February 20, 2015 2:52 pm

Dev wrote:ok grandma

Never heard of it. Was it any good?

VinylGuy · Post by **VinylGuy** » Fri February 20, 2015 3:18 pm

durdencommatyler wrote:Excellent direction, art direction, make-up and scoring. There's a lot to love about the movie. The direction blew me away.

The direction was one of the most boring-conservative ever. Not a single good frame. It was a Hallmark movie.

Post by **epilogue** » Fri February 20, 2015 3:35 pm

VinylGuy wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Excellent direction, art direction, make-up and scoring. There's a lot to love about the movie. The direction blew me away.
The direction was one of the most boring-conservative ever. Not a single good frame. It was a Hallmark movie.

The brilliant use and repetition of pattern. The juxtaposition of wide angle and full frame narrative. The subtle layering of splatter/star imagery. The winding and unwinding, the use of spiral motif. The clever interplay of color and theme which allowed the actors to do their job and not have to rely on heavy-handedness. Yeah, super boring. You're right. Zero artistry. I can't believe anyone would enjoy this piece of shit.

Post by **Jorge** » Fri February 20, 2015 3:46 pm

YOU DO A GOOD JOB OF EXTOLLING THE VIRTUES OF THE UNREMARKABLE

Post by **epilogue** » Fri February 20, 2015 4:02 pm

apples vanguard wrote:YOU DO A GOOD JOB OF EXTOLLING THE VIRTUES OF THE UNREMARKABLE

haha

VinylGuy · Post by **VinylGuy** » Fri February 20, 2015 4:26 pm

durdencommatyler wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Excellent direction, art direction, make-up and scoring. There's a lot to love about the movie. The direction blew me away.
The direction was one of the most boring-conservative ever. Not a single good frame. It was a Hallmark movie.
The brilliant use and repetition of pattern. The juxtaposition of wide angle and full frame narrative. The subtle layering of splatter/star imagery. The winding and unwinding, the use of spiral motif. The clever interplay of color and theme which allowed the actors to do their job and not have to rely on heavy-handedness. Yeah, super boring. You're right. Zero artistry. I can't believe anyone would enjoy this piece of shit.

Its a very safe movie, directed by the most conventional way of directing this type of movies.

Post by **Alex** » Fri February 20, 2015 4:41 pm

VinylGuy wrote:directed by the most conventional way of directing this type of movies

Post by **epilogue** » Fri February 20, 2015 5:21 pm

VinylGuy wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Excellent direction, art direction, make-up and scoring. There's a lot to love about the movie. The direction blew me away.
The direction was one of the most boring-conservative ever. Not a single good frame. It was a Hallmark movie.
The brilliant use and repetition of pattern. The juxtaposition of wide angle and full frame narrative. The subtle layering of splatter/star imagery. The winding and unwinding, the use of spiral motif. The clever interplay of color and theme which allowed the actors to do their job and not have to rely on heavy-handedness. Yeah, super boring. You're right. Zero artistry. I can't believe anyone would enjoy this piece of shit.
Its a very safe movie, directed by the most conventional way of directing this type of movies.

Yeah, there are no boobs if that's what you mean.

VinylGuy · Post by **VinylGuy** » Fri February 20, 2015 5:51 pm

durdencommatyler wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Excellent direction, art direction, make-up and scoring. There's a lot to love about the movie. The direction blew me away.
The direction was one of the most boring-conservative ever. Not a single good frame. It was a Hallmark movie.
The brilliant use and repetition of pattern. The juxtaposition of wide angle and full frame narrative. The subtle layering of splatter/star imagery. The winding and unwinding, the use of spiral motif. The clever interplay of color and theme which allowed the actors to do their job and not have to rely on heavy-handedness. Yeah, super boring. You're right. Zero artistry. I can't believe anyone would enjoy this piece of shit.
Its a very safe movie, directed by the most conventional way of directing this type of movies.
Yeah, there are no boobs if that's what you mean.

no, no....it was like a tv movie. There is nothing special about the approach of the director here. The score was mediocre too.

Post by **epilogue** » Fri February 20, 2015 5:53 pm

VinylGuy wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Excellent direction, art direction, make-up and scoring. There's a lot to love about the movie. The direction blew me away.
The direction was one of the most boring-conservative ever. Not a single good frame. It was a Hallmark movie.
The brilliant use and repetition of pattern. The juxtaposition of wide angle and full frame narrative. The subtle layering of splatter/star imagery. The winding and unwinding, the use of spiral motif. The clever interplay of color and theme which allowed the actors to do their job and not have to rely on heavy-handedness. Yeah, super boring. You're right. Zero artistry. I can't believe anyone would enjoy this piece of shit.
Its a very safe movie, directed by the most conventional way of directing this type of movies.
Yeah, there are no boobs if that's what you mean.
no, no....it was like a tv movie. There is nothing special about the approach of the director here. The score was mediocre too.

Never mind, Guy. It's just... nope, never mind.

Kaius · Post by **Kaius** » Fri February 20, 2015 6:01 pm

Guys, put down the knives. No one has to get hurt.

Red Mosquito

What movies are you watching?

Re: What movies are you watching?

Re: What movies are you watching?

Re: What movies are you watching?

Re: What movies are you watching?

Re: What movies are you watching?

Re: What movies are you watching?

Re: What movies are you watching?

Re: What movies are you watching?

Re: What movies are you watching?

Re: What movies are you watching?

Re: What movies are you watching?

Re: What movies are you watching?

Re: What movies are you watching?

Re: What movies are you watching?

Re: What movies are you watching?

Re: What movies are you watching?

Re: What movies are you watching?

Re: What movies are you watching?

Re: What movies are you watching?

Re: What movies are you watching?