Re: What movies are you watching?
Posted: Wed February 18, 2015 1:14 am
DON'T SAY THAT YOU LOVE ME
congrats!Kaius wrote:Well, I wasn't expecting to see Tom Hardy's penis tonight, but I did.
Never heard of it. Was it any good?Dev wrote:ok grandma
The direction was one of the most boring-conservative ever. Not a single good frame. It was a Hallmark movie.durdencommatyler wrote:Excellent direction, art direction, make-up and scoring. There's a lot to love about the movie. The direction blew me away.
The brilliant use and repetition of pattern. The juxtaposition of wide angle and full frame narrative. The subtle layering of splatter/star imagery. The winding and unwinding, the use of spiral motif. The clever interplay of color and theme which allowed the actors to do their job and not have to rely on heavy-handedness. Yeah, super boring. You're right. Zero artistry. I can't believe anyone would enjoy this piece of shit.VinylGuy wrote:The direction was one of the most boring-conservative ever. Not a single good frame. It was a Hallmark movie.durdencommatyler wrote:Excellent direction, art direction, make-up and scoring. There's a lot to love about the movie. The direction blew me away.
hahaapples vanguard wrote:YOU DO A GOOD JOB OF EXTOLLING THE VIRTUES OF THE UNREMARKABLE
Its a very safe movie, directed by the most conventional way of directing this type of movies.durdencommatyler wrote:The brilliant use and repetition of pattern. The juxtaposition of wide angle and full frame narrative. The subtle layering of splatter/star imagery. The winding and unwinding, the use of spiral motif. The clever interplay of color and theme which allowed the actors to do their job and not have to rely on heavy-handedness. Yeah, super boring. You're right. Zero artistry. I can't believe anyone would enjoy this piece of shit.VinylGuy wrote:The direction was one of the most boring-conservative ever. Not a single good frame. It was a Hallmark movie.durdencommatyler wrote:Excellent direction, art direction, make-up and scoring. There's a lot to love about the movie. The direction blew me away.
VinylGuy wrote:directed by the most conventional way of directing this type of movies

Yeah, there are no boobs if that's what you mean.VinylGuy wrote:Its a very safe movie, directed by the most conventional way of directing this type of movies.durdencommatyler wrote:The brilliant use and repetition of pattern. The juxtaposition of wide angle and full frame narrative. The subtle layering of splatter/star imagery. The winding and unwinding, the use of spiral motif. The clever interplay of color and theme which allowed the actors to do their job and not have to rely on heavy-handedness. Yeah, super boring. You're right. Zero artistry. I can't believe anyone would enjoy this piece of shit.VinylGuy wrote:The direction was one of the most boring-conservative ever. Not a single good frame. It was a Hallmark movie.durdencommatyler wrote:Excellent direction, art direction, make-up and scoring. There's a lot to love about the movie. The direction blew me away.
no, no....it was like a tv movie. There is nothing special about the approach of the director here. The score was mediocre too.durdencommatyler wrote:Yeah, there are no boobs if that's what you mean.VinylGuy wrote:Its a very safe movie, directed by the most conventional way of directing this type of movies.durdencommatyler wrote:The brilliant use and repetition of pattern. The juxtaposition of wide angle and full frame narrative. The subtle layering of splatter/star imagery. The winding and unwinding, the use of spiral motif. The clever interplay of color and theme which allowed the actors to do their job and not have to rely on heavy-handedness. Yeah, super boring. You're right. Zero artistry. I can't believe anyone would enjoy this piece of shit.VinylGuy wrote:The direction was one of the most boring-conservative ever. Not a single good frame. It was a Hallmark movie.durdencommatyler wrote:Excellent direction, art direction, make-up and scoring. There's a lot to love about the movie. The direction blew me away.
Never mind, Guy. It's just... nope, never mind.VinylGuy wrote:no, no....it was like a tv movie. There is nothing special about the approach of the director here. The score was mediocre too.durdencommatyler wrote:Yeah, there are no boobs if that's what you mean.VinylGuy wrote:Its a very safe movie, directed by the most conventional way of directing this type of movies.durdencommatyler wrote:The brilliant use and repetition of pattern. The juxtaposition of wide angle and full frame narrative. The subtle layering of splatter/star imagery. The winding and unwinding, the use of spiral motif. The clever interplay of color and theme which allowed the actors to do their job and not have to rely on heavy-handedness. Yeah, super boring. You're right. Zero artistry. I can't believe anyone would enjoy this piece of shit.VinylGuy wrote:The direction was one of the most boring-conservative ever. Not a single good frame. It was a Hallmark movie.durdencommatyler wrote:Excellent direction, art direction, make-up and scoring. There's a lot to love about the movie. The direction blew me away.