The Supreme Court

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

Don’t Gorsuch On Me
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46221
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by BurtReynolds »

Don't hate the player, hate the game.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85135
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by epilogue »

tragabigzanda wrote:
Strat wrote:Why the fuck can't he wait 6 goddamn months.
I'm not even mad at him, the dude is 80 something, he should probably...
Image
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85135
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by epilogue »

Green Habit wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
Strat wrote:Why the fuck can't he wait 6 goddamn months.
I'm not even mad at him, the dude is 80 something, he should probably spend time with his family. I am still PISSED with the Dems for taking such a white glove approach to the Garland/Gorsuch fiasco. They should have been guns blazing, now we all get to suffer for decades. Awesome.
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Democrats are the most useless pussies in the world. Already folding to the will of Republicans on this. Again. Fuck them. Worthless. Ugh.
There's nothing the Dems could have ultimately done back then, and there's not much they can do now. Sucks if you're a supporter of the Dems, but that's where we're at.
Exactly. The way McConnell pissed all over the system was disgusting and abhorrent and I believe there's a special place in Hell for him. BUT... even if they'd had the hearing, they wouldn't have appointed him. There was nothing to be done.
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by digster »

Good lord, people think things are ugly now.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35414
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Strat »

digster wrote:Good lord, people think things are ugly now.
Yea my stomach just sank thinking about the next 50 years.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51687
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by tragabigzanda »

FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Wed January 14, 2026 8:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36746
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Jorge »

Channel it into your ice cream business
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by digster »

Strat wrote:
digster wrote:Good lord, people think things are ugly now.
Yea my stomach just sank thinking about the next 50 years.
I mean, part of the big concern in the long run is something similar you're going to see more and more in Congress, which is that as the decades go on, Republicans are likely to be at an extreme legislative advantage that is not going to be represented in the makeup of the country. Younger generations are markedly more liberal than older generations; that's not revelatory or anything, but unless large swaths of younger Americans change their political persuasion, the Republican party in 20-25 years will likely be in quite a bit of trouble, in terms of the raw numbers.

But that's not really true in Congress, with gerrymandering, but also sorting; younger liberals are moving to cities and other areas where there is a better culture/more job opportunities, while older conservatives remain behind with a power greater than their raw numbers. And I think it's going to be even more pronounced with the Court. Let's say Trump wins re-election; it's conceivable that 15-20 years from now, you could have a 7-2 or 8-1 conservative court in a country far more liberal than it is today. Which I would imagine would get fairly ugly.
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by digster »

I'm also not too well-versed on Court history, so I'd be interested in learning if at any point the ideological sway of the court was way out of step with the country's ideological leanings.
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Green Habit »

digster wrote:Let's say Trump wins re-election; it's conceivable that 15-20 years from now, you could have a 7-2 or 8-1 conservative court in a country far more liberal than it is today. Which I would imagine would get fairly ugly.
If this happens, there's almost certainly going to be some court packing.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35414
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Strat »

digster wrote:
Strat wrote:
digster wrote:Good lord, people think things are ugly now.
Yea my stomach just sank thinking about the next 50 years.
I mean, part of the big concern in the long run is something similar you're going to see more and more in Congress, which is that as the decades go on, Republicans are likely to be at an extreme legislative advantage that is not going to be represented in the makeup of the country. Younger generations are markedly more liberal than older generations; that's not revelatory or anything, but unless large swaths of younger Americans change their political persuasion, the Republican party in 20-25 years will likely be in quite a bit of trouble, in terms of the raw numbers.

But that's not really true in Congress, with gerrymandering, but also sorting; younger liberals are moving to cities and other areas where there is a better culture/more job opportunities, while older conservatives remain behind with a power greater than their raw numbers. And I think it's going to be even more pronounced with the Court. Let's say Trump wins re-election; it's conceivable that 15-20 years from now, you could have a 7-2 or 8-1 conservative court in a country far more liberal than it is today. Which I would imagine would get fairly ugly.
Burts wildest dreams are coming true.
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by digster »

Green Habit wrote:
digster wrote:Let's say Trump wins re-election; it's conceivable that 15-20 years from now, you could have a 7-2 or 8-1 conservative court in a country far more liberal than it is today. Which I would imagine would get fairly ugly.
If this happens, there's almost certainly going to be some court packing.
Yeah, that's a good point.
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29871
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

not necessarily if ~50% of the voting population remains ignorant as to which party actually reflects their best interests
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85135
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by epilogue »

Strat wrote:
digster wrote:Good lord, people think things are ugly now.
Yea my stomach just sank thinking about the next 50 years.
aw huh
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85135
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by epilogue »

tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
Strat wrote:Why the fuck can't he wait 6 goddamn months.
I'm not even mad at him, the dude is 80 something, he should probably spend time with his family. I am still PISSED with the Dems for taking such a white glove approach to the Garland/Gorsuch fiasco. They should have been guns blazing, now we all get to suffer for decades. Awesome.
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Democrats are the most useless pussies in the world. Already folding to the will of Republicans on this. Again. Fuck them. Worthless. Ugh.
There's nothing the Dems could have ultimately done back then, and there's not much they can do now. Sucks if you're a supporter of the Dems, but that's where we're at.
Exactly. The way McConnell pissed all over the system was disgusting and abhorrent and I believe there's a special place in Hell for him. BUT... even if they'd had the hearing, they wouldn't have appointed him. There was nothing to be done.
yeah this is all fair. so where should i direct my anger?
Destroying Republicans in November.
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

digster wrote:Good lord, people think things are ugly now.
So, what is going to happen?
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by digster »

I tried explaining it above, at least as best I could in terms of what could be happening in 20 years if it's an overwhelmingly conservative court.
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

digster wrote:I tried explaining it above, at least as best I could in terms of what could be happening in 20 years if it's an overwhelmingly conservative court.
I see that now, bad thread reading on my part.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 25034
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

Green Habit wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
B wrote:
Green Habit wrote:I can think of a few of you that may :thumbsup: this, but this gets a huge :thumbsdown: from me.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/1 ... 6_2b3j.pdf
I'm fine with it, as long as people who refuse to pay the dues are stripped of any pay raises negotiated by the union, overtime pay, health insurance, holiday leave, and grievance procedures.

Unions have been giving workers benefits for so long, people don't see how much better off they are b/c of them.
That would backfire immediately. All the employer would have to do is give disproportionate raises and leave to the people who opt out and then the union likely goes away entirely.
Bingo.
Well, I was just talking it out.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
Post Reply