Page 32 of 48

Re: Black Lives Matter

Posted: Mon January 04, 2021 4:18 pm
by verb_to_trust
Do you have a necklace like that B? PJ/CDM?

Re: Black Lives Matter

Posted: Mon January 04, 2021 10:08 pm
by Bi_3
verb_to_trust wrote:We've reached the stage of wokeness where they get to be proud of stuff like this when called out.
That's literally the only stage of wokeness.

Re: Black Lives Matter

Posted: Mon January 04, 2021 10:24 pm
by Rob
I feel like the woke argument is (always has been) a "Neo vs Agent Smith" scenario. The two sides of people who focus a lot of attention/energy on it - for or against - grow stronger & weaker as a pair. I kind of feel like the "woke movement" has stalled (?) or is maybe just weakening? That would be great if it calms down the anti-woke argument crowd too.

Re: Black Lives Matter

Posted: Wed April 14, 2021 2:14 pm
by Peeps

Re: Black Lives Matter

Posted: Wed April 14, 2021 3:12 pm
by Bi_3
Peeps wrote:

How is that not inciting violence against an individual?


https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-p ... rification
https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-p ... nformation

Re: Black Lives Matter

Posted: Wed April 14, 2021 3:30 pm
by Peeps
Bi_3 wrote:
Peeps wrote:

How is that not inciting violence against an individual?


https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-p ... rification
https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-p ... nformation

asking for a name isnt inciting violence

i think the fact that he assaulted the young man and the sheriffs said they would not press charges is the bigger issue

Re: Black Lives Matter

Posted: Wed April 14, 2021 3:38 pm
by wease
Peeps wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
Peeps wrote:

How is that not inciting violence against an individual?


https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-p ... rification
https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-p ... nformation

asking for a name isnt inciting violence

i think the fact that he assaulted the young man and the sheriffs said they would not press charges is the bigger issue
What did he do that got the whole neighborhood on him? Just walk around?

Re: Black Lives Matter

Posted: Wed April 14, 2021 3:41 pm
by Bi_3
Peeps wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
Peeps wrote:

How is that not inciting violence against an individual?


https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-p ... rification
https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-p ... nformation

asking for a name isnt inciting violence

i think the fact that he assaulted the young man and the sheriffs said they would not press charges is the bigger issue
Not sure that's accurate:

https://www.the-sun.com/news/2697369/da ... minnesota/

Re: Black Lives Matter

Posted: Wed April 14, 2021 3:44 pm
by verb_to_trust
There isn't anything arrest worthy in that clip. Where are their masks though?!

As for Angry Staffer, who is probably just some neck beard in their basement that built an online persona and not actually an ex white house staffer, it's pretty fucking lame to go all doxx justice. If people just got off social media that would be for the best. If a tree falls in the forest, do we hear it, do we care?

Re: Black Lives Matter

Posted: Wed April 14, 2021 4:12 pm
by Bi_3
verb_to_trust wrote:There isn't anything arrest worthy in that clip. Where are their masks though?!

As for Angry Staffer, who is probably just some neck beard in their basement that built an online persona and not actually an ex white house staffer, it's pretty fucking lame to go all doxx justice. If people just got off social media that would be for the best. If a tree falls in the forest, do we hear it, do we care?


Well yeah, she had already fled because of exactly what the tweet above was trying to do. The old "Wow! Joe Smith whose family lives at 1234 Main Street is a violent racist douche and the authorities won't do anything so he's gonna get away with it."

Re: Black Lives Matter

Posted: Wed April 14, 2021 4:27 pm
by verb_to_trust
Bi_3 wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:There isn't anything arrest worthy in that clip. Where are their masks though?!

As for Angry Staffer, who is probably just some neck beard in their basement that built an online persona and not actually an ex white house staffer, it's pretty fucking lame to go all doxx justice. If people just got off social media that would be for the best. If a tree falls in the forest, do we hear it, do we care?


Well yeah, she had already fled because of exactly what the tweet above was trying to do. The old "Wow! Joe Smith whose family lives at 1234 Main Street is a violent racist douche and the authorities won't do anything so he's gonna get away with it."
He's probably going to get fired from his

Re: Black Lives Matter

Posted: Wed April 14, 2021 4:36 pm
by Peeps
verb_to_trust wrote:There isn't anything arrest worthy in that clip. Where are their masks though?!

As for Angry Staffer, who is probably just some neck beard in their basement that built an online persona and not actually an ex white house staffer, it's pretty fucking lame to go all doxx justice. If people just got off social media that would be for the best. If a tree falls in the forest, do we hear it, do we care?
oh, and like you are really a verb?

white people in particular who do this type of thing are the worst and he deserves every bit of hell that is hopefully coming his way. and you grab someone and push them violently while trying to intimidate them is surely something to be handcuffed for

Re: Black Lives Matter

Posted: Wed April 14, 2021 4:43 pm
by verb_to_trust
Where is the violent shove in that clip? People cry about police overreach yet want people arrested for hurting feelings. It's stupid.

Re: Black Lives Matter

Posted: Wed April 14, 2021 5:00 pm
by Peeps
did you not watch the video? try between the 40-50 second mark

Re: Black Lives Matter

Posted: Wed April 14, 2021 5:07 pm
by verb_to_trust
Peeps wrote:did you not watch the video? try between the 40-50 second mark
That's not assault.

Re: Black Lives Matter

Posted: Wed April 14, 2021 5:15 pm
by Peeps
verb_to_trust wrote:
Peeps wrote:did you not watch the video? try between the 40-50 second mark
That's not assault.
i dont think you understand the law, you are not allowed to physically touch someone like that, whether you are threatening them or not

Re: Black Lives Matter

Posted: Wed April 14, 2021 5:17 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
verb_to_trust wrote:Where are their masks though?!
:lol:

Re: Black Lives Matter

Posted: Wed April 14, 2021 5:17 pm
by verb_to_trust
Peeps wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:
Peeps wrote:did you not watch the video? try between the 40-50 second mark
That's not assault.
i dont think you understand the law, you are not allowed to physically touch someone like that, whether you are threatening them or not
What is and isn't a judicially relevant arrest always seems to be inflated when people are lost in their feelings about something. That report would sit in a pile and go nowhere. Which is probably why the new thing is to post reactionary shit on social media and try and get results using that route.

Re: Black Lives Matter

Posted: Wed April 14, 2021 11:17 pm
by Peeps

Re: Black Lives Matter

Posted: Thu April 15, 2021 12:59 am
by verb_to_trust
We are the dumbest fucking country