Re: 2013 NFL Season
Posted: Mon October 14, 2013 2:13 am
LOL Rob Ryan
no one is going undefeated this year, so at least their first loss came to another really good team, NO will be just finepsychobain wrote:shit happens
guy just picked the worst defense ever and made it decent
It would take some key injuries for this not to happen.psychobain wrote:i believe the Broncos will be 16-0
well they do have two games against the Chiefs, as well as the games against Indy (beat Seattle), New England (beat New Orleans), and Houston (Schaub's gone now and they'll have a new coach by then).Thejambi wrote:It would take some key injuries for this not to happen.psychobain wrote:i believe the Broncos will be 16-0
The Chiefs are over achieving if you ask me. Denver's defense does need to shape up but I'll take manning, welker, decker, Thomas &Thomas and their rb corp over any team at this point.elliseamos wrote:well they do have two games against the Chiefs, as well as the games against Indy (beat Seattle), New England (beat New Orleans), and Houston (Schaub's gone now and they'll have a new coach by then).Thejambi wrote:It would take some key injuries for this not to happen.psychobain wrote:i believe the Broncos will be 16-0
Broncos and Chiefs will split their division series. They always win their home stand when both teams are at least mediocre, let alone good.Thejambi wrote:The Chiefs are over achieving if you ask me. Denver's defense does need to shape up but I'll take manning, welker, decker, Thomas &Thomas and their rb corp over any team at this point.elliseamos wrote:well they do have two games against the Chiefs, as well as the games against Indy (beat Seattle), New England (beat New Orleans), and Houston (Schaub's gone now and they'll have a new coach by then).Thejambi wrote:It would take some key injuries for this not to happen.psychobain wrote:i believe the Broncos will be 16-0
i dont see them making it all the way, someone will catch them on a bad day, jacksonville gave them a run, if they do that against a better team then they will get the Lpsychobain wrote:i believe the Broncos will be 16-0
It really sucks for Manning that it's going to be a cold weather Super Bowl this year. Also, Roger Goodell is a liar. That is all.Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:i dont see them making it all the way, someone will catch them on a bad day, jacksonville gave them a run, if they do that against a better team then they will get the Lpsychobain wrote:i believe the Broncos will be 16-0
i have no one i would pick over them for a SB win, but i dont think undefeated is somehting they will be worried about
4/5 wrote:It really sucks for Manning that it's going to be a cold weather Super Bowl this year. Also, Roger Goodell is a liar. That is all.Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:i dont see them making it all the way, someone will catch them on a bad day, jacksonville gave them a run, if they do that against a better team then they will get the Lpsychobain wrote:i believe the Broncos will be 16-0
i have no one i would pick over them for a SB win, but i dont think undefeated is somehting they will be worried about
I suspect that's right.Green Habit wrote:Broncos and Chiefs will split their division series. They always win their home stand when both teams are at least mediocre, let alone good.Thejambi wrote:The Chiefs are over achieving if you ask me. Denver's defense does need to shape up but I'll take manning, welker, decker, Thomas &Thomas and their rb corp over any team at this point.elliseamos wrote:well they do have two games against the Chiefs, as well as the games against Indy (beat Seattle), New England (beat New Orleans), and Houston (Schaub's gone now and they'll have a new coach by then).Thejambi wrote:It would take some key injuries for this not to happen.psychobain wrote:i believe the Broncos will be 16-0
Yeah that's pretty ridiculous.Electromatic wrote:http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/10/15/in-moving-on-from-manning-irsay-says-he-chose-championships-over-stats/
If your last name is IRSAY you're a fucking prick.
KC & Denver have played almost all the same teams. Therefore, if one is overachieving, maybe the other is too? Or at least not as dominant as hype would lead you to believe?Thejambi wrote:The Chiefs are over achieving if you ask me.
I do think KC's defense is legit. Their offense however is built purely on short throws and check downs. Denver's offense has been so much better than anyone else's their is no way I can bet against it. Over 44 ppg. That's almost 20 more points per game than KC! The flip side is Denver's D has been really bad. I think Denver's offense will be able to overelliseamos wrote:KC & Denver have played almost all the same teams. Therefore, if one is overachieving, maybe the other is too? Or at least not as dominant as hype would lead you to believe?Thejambi wrote:The Chiefs are over achieving if you ask me.
Who they've beaten:
KC-------Den
JAX-------BAL
DAL-------NYG
PHI-------OAK
NYG-------PHI
TEN-------DAL
OAK-------JAX
So that leaves "a win against BAL" vs. "a win against TEN" as the deciding factor. BAL beat HOU where TEN lost to HOU, but is this enough to truly claim one team is a SB favorite and the other is dismissed? I don't know the answer, I'm just asking the question.
it's the age-old question: which side of the ball benefits more from an inferior opponent?Thejambi wrote:I do think KC's defense is legit. Their offense however is built purely on short throws and check downs. Denver's offense has been so much better than anyone else's their is no way I can bet against it. Over 44 ppg. That's almost 20 more points per game than KC! The flip side is Denver's D has been really bad. I think Denver's offense will be able to overwhelm KCs D enough and the defense will manage KCs check down offense to have the edge. I think they will be good games.elliseamos wrote:KC & Denver have played almost all the same teams. Therefore, if one is overachieving, maybe the other is too? Or at least not as dominant as hype would lead you to believe?Thejambi wrote:The Chiefs are over achieving if you ask me.
Who they've beaten:
KC-------Den
JAX-------BAL
DAL-------NYG
PHI-------OAK
NYG-------PHI
TEN-------DAL
OAK-------JAX
So that leaves "a win against BAL" vs. "a win against TEN" as the deciding factor. BAL beat HOU where TEN lost to HOU, but is this enough to truly claim one team is a SB favorite and the other is dismissed? I don't know the answer, I'm just asking the question.