Red Mosquito

60 games it is then!

@SkitchP wrote:60 games it is then!

Let's do it!

Day four matchups...

Tigers - Indians
at Detroit: Mullin (R) vs. Coveleski (R), at Cleveland: Lolich (L) vs. Gregg (L)

Rangers - Pirates
at Texas: Ryan (R) vs. Veale (L), at Pittsburgh: Darvish (R) vs. Law (R)

White Sox - Astros
at Chicago: Smith (R) vs. Dierker (R), at Houston: Faber (R) vs. Clemens (R)

Reds - Cardinals
at Cincinnati: Rhines (R) vs. Cooper (R), at St. Louis: Luque (R) vs. Tudor (L)

Royals - Blue Jays
at Kansas City: Appier (R) vs. Clemens (R), at Toronto: Cone (R) vs. Stieb (R)

Cubs - Expos
at Chicago: Brown (R) vs. D. Martinez (R), at Montreal: Vaughn (L) vs. Vazquez (R)

Yankees - Red Sox
at New York: Gomez (L) vs. Young (R), at Boston: Chandler (R) vs. Martinez (R)

Orioles - Mariners
at Baltimore: Kilroy (L) vs. Langston (L), at Seattle: Palmer (R) vs. Hernandez (R)

Let me know if any of these are wrong.

Looks right to me. It'll be nice to see Foxx in the lineup for game 1.

Guys, the Skitch Red Machine could put the Cardinals in a huge fucking hole tomorrow. A bad day for St. Louis and they could be looking at 1-7 with the Yankees, Red Sox, and Indians all still on the schedule.

And Ruddo becomes the first person to have his two teams face each other. Tigers-Indians could be big too.

cutuphalfdead wrote:Looks right to me. It'll be nice to see Foxx in the lineup for game 1.

Did you go with the six man rotation so that you could have Cy and Pedro facing the Yankees?

I had Dennis Martinez's game 3 pitching stats under Pedro's name. Fixed it now.

I am pretty sure Roger Clemens will end up pitching for someone, somewhere, on every single day of the season.

How many of you are using the Expos spreadsheet I made as your template? Because your pitching totals may be wrong.

cutuphalfdead wrote:How many of you are using the Expos spreadsheet I made as your template? Because your pitching totals may be wrong.

where should i be looking

I'm using the Expos one.

If you used my Expos template your first pitching row in the totals section (cell row 29) is slightly off in the adding formulas.

=B29+B68+B107+B146+B185+B224+B263+B302+B341+B380+B419+B458+B497+B536+B575+B614+B653+B692+B731+B770+B809+B848+B887+B926+B965+B1004+B1043+B1082+B1121+B1160

is correct for Innings Pitch. I had B109 in place of B107. So make sure it's 107 instead of 109 and then drag it across so it's the same for the other stats along row 29.

If you added rows for pitchers it might not be 109 and 107 you're dealing with, but the second value added in that formula might be off by 2 digits.

So all the 109s in the row 29 totals should be 107s?

Tomorrow ONLY against the righty


CF- Granderson
2B- Lou Whitaker
SS- Alan Trammell
1B- Cash
C- Martinez
RF- Kaline
LF- Heilmann
3B- Gullien


In large part to get rid of all the stupid "DIVIDE BY ZERO" and "#'s" in my spread sheet.

Lament wrote:So all the 109s in the row 29 totals should be 107s?

Yes. I mean it should be obvious based on the pattern. In the example I showed the last digit of each value in the formula (starting with 9) descends by 1 as you go across. The 109 is clearly out of place.

You can even go look at what row 109 and 107 corresponds to in your spreadsheet to confirm.

Though what's strange is on the blank page I have reserved for a potential playoff stat sheet it's correct with 107.

If you added rows your pattern would be different. Instead of last digit descends by 1 it might be last digit stays the same, or something else entirely. Either way, it's worth clicking through your cells to make sure they all follow the same pattern, whatever it is.

I wonder if you just messed it up after you started adding stats, because I am not seeing it on my Tigers one.

Ok, I changed all of the 109s in row 29 to 107s. It didn't change anything though.

Lament wrote:Ok, I changed all of the 109s in row 29 to 107s. It didn't change anything though.

That's because you probably had nothing in 107 or 109.