Red Mosquito

Seriously i just pictured myself in 10 years. Coming home from living my life and wanting to kick my feet up with a glass of wine. A desire to watch Star Wars and 1,000 Star Wars movies to choose from.

Life is great.

LetMeSleep wrote:This looks so good. I love Star Wars. All of it and I might have to jerk off. But at I'm at work. What can I say, I rebel.

This is going to be a long wait till it's released.

I'm a jerk off. I jerk off.

WHO IS THE CLOAKED FIGURE

EJ wrote:

LetMeSleep wrote:This looks so good. I love Star Wars. All of it and I might have to jerk off. But at I'm at work. What can I say, I rebel.

This is going to be a long wait till it's released.

I'm a jerk off. I jerk off.

It's true. All of it.

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:Just because of the director alone this will be a better movie, but whatever.

I draft you

I mean, come on, right? When I saw Monsters it changed the way I watch and think about movies, and I'm not kidding when I say that.

Force Awakens didn't have a lot of individually "bad" lines. It's problem was that 90% of them were either exposition or shouted stage directions. There wasn't a lot below the surface.

"This is a map to Luke Skywalker."
"I will take the map to the Resistance."
"Good. (Looking directly at audience) It's important and there are stakes."

Later...

"Run over here!"
"I can't because I'm fixing a thing!"
"I'm going to try something then, so we can-"
"Wait! Look at those xwings! Those are the resistance!"
"Thank you for explaining that to the audience for me!"

Strat wrote:WHO IS THE CLOAKED FIGURE

Lieutenant Phasma

Strat wrote:

EJ wrote:

Strat wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:I'm getting the feeling that some of you don't want this to be as good or better than TFA, even though it shouldn't be a discussion as they are separate from one another. Just because of the director alone this will be a better movie, but whatever.

Thats a very LV thing of you to say!

Im excited for this. Big time.

same. visually, this already looks better than TFA.

I like the grittier feel, for sure, as it ties in more closely to A New Hope. Though, I thought TFA looked wonderful

It did. Whatever issues TFA had, visuals was not one of them.

And what's extra special awesome is that RO is borrowing some looks from TFA. So there is a visual continuity; these films belong to the same universe/continuity. It's really exciting.

durdencommatyler wrote:

Strat wrote:

EJ wrote:

Strat wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:I'm getting the feeling that some of you don't want this to be as good or better than TFA, even though it shouldn't be a discussion as they are separate from one another. Just because of the director alone this will be a better movie, but whatever.

Thats a very LV thing of you to say!

Im excited for this. Big time.

same. visually, this already looks better than TFA.

I like the grittier feel, for sure, as it ties in more closely to A New Hope. Though, I thought TFA looked wonderful

It did. Whatever issues TFA had, visuals was not one of them.

And what's extra special awesome is that RO is borrowing some looks from TFA. So there is a visual continuity; these films belong to the same universe/continuity. It's really exciting.

Im so thankful george lucas sold his empire. Fuck. I could live in the Star Wars universe.

McParadigm wrote:Force Awakens didn't have a lot of individually "bad" lines. It's problem was that 90% of them were either exposition or shouted stage directions. There wasn't a lot below the surface.

"This is a map to Luke Skywalker."
"I will take the map to the Resistance."
"Good. (Looking directly at audience) It's important and there are stakes."

Later...

"Run over here!"
"I can't because I'm fixing a thing!"
"I'm going to try something then, so we can-"
"Wait! Look at those xwings! Those are the resistance!"
"Thank you for explaining that to the audience for me!"

I don't know, Finn's delivery on some lines were very out of place for a Star Wars movie.

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

McParadigm wrote:Force Awakens didn't have a lot of individually "bad" lines. It's problem was that 90% of them were either exposition or shouted stage directions. There wasn't a lot below the surface.

"This is a map to Luke Skywalker."
"I will take the map to the Resistance."
"Good. (Looking directly at audience) It's important and there are stakes."

Later...

"Run over here!"
"I can't because I'm fixing a thing!"
"I'm going to try something then, so we can-"
"Wait! Look at those xwings! Those are the resistance!"
"Thank you for explaining that to the audience for me!"

I don't know, Finn's delivery on some lines were very out of place for a Star Wars movie.

Is this a race thing?

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

McParadigm wrote:Force Awakens didn't have a lot of individually "bad" lines. It's problem was that 90% of them were either exposition or shouted stage directions. There wasn't a lot below the surface.

"This is a map to Luke Skywalker."
"I will take the map to the Resistance."
"Good. (Looking directly at audience) It's important and there are stakes."

Later...

"Run over here!"
"I can't because I'm fixing a thing!"
"I'm going to try something then, so we can-"
"Wait! Look at those xwings! Those are the resistance!"
"Thank you for explaining that to the audience for me!"

I don't know, Finn's delivery on some lines were very out of place for a Star Wars movie.

They were though that has more to do with star wars being in the 70's and now here we are in 2016. In a galaxy far far away.

Whatever. Fuck TFA.

I'm sorry, Ruddo.

Spoiler: show

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

McParadigm wrote:Force Awakens didn't have a lot of individually "bad" lines. It's problem was that 90% of them were either exposition or shouted stage directions. There wasn't a lot below the surface.

"This is a map to Luke Skywalker."
"I will take the map to the Resistance."
"Good. (Looking directly at audience) It's important and there are stakes."

Later...

"Run over here!"
"I can't because I'm fixing a thing!"
"I'm going to try something then, so we can-"
"Wait! Look at those xwings! Those are the resistance!"
"Thank you for explaining that to the audience for me!"

I don't know, Finn's delivery on some lines were very out of place for a Star Wars movie.

OH HELL YA

LetMeSleep wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

McParadigm wrote:Force Awakens didn't have a lot of individually "bad" lines. It's problem was that 90% of them were either exposition or shouted stage directions. There wasn't a lot below the surface.

"This is a map to Luke Skywalker."
"I will take the map to the Resistance."
"Good. (Looking directly at audience) It's important and there are stakes."

Later...

"Run over here!"
"I can't because I'm fixing a thing!"
"I'm going to try something then, so we can-"
"Wait! Look at those xwings! Those are the resistance!"
"Thank you for explaining that to the audience for me!"

I don't know, Finn's delivery on some lines were very out of place for a Star Wars movie.

Is this a race thing?

No. Whoever gets there first.

LetMeSleep wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

McParadigm wrote:Force Awakens didn't have a lot of individually "bad" lines. It's problem was that 90% of them were either exposition or shouted stage directions. There wasn't a lot below the surface.

"This is a map to Luke Skywalker."
"I will take the map to the Resistance."
"Good. (Looking directly at audience) It's important and there are stakes."

Later...

"Run over here!"
"I can't because I'm fixing a thing!"
"I'm going to try something then, so we can-"
"Wait! Look at those xwings! Those are the resistance!"
"Thank you for explaining that to the audience for me!"

I don't know, Finn's delivery on some lines were very out of place for a Star Wars movie.

Is this a race thing?

Not at all. I just mean they felt like he was in a present day, earth as the setting, movie. We can't have hipsters and millenials infiltrating the dialogue in a Star Wars movie.

tragabigzanda wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

Strat wrote:

EJ wrote:

Strat wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:I'm getting the feeling that some of you don't want this to be as good or better than TFA, even though it shouldn't be a discussion as they are separate from one another. Just because of the director alone this will be a better movie, but whatever.

Thats a very LV thing of you to say!

Im excited for this. Big time.

same. visually, this already looks better than TFA.

I like the grittier feel, for sure, as it ties in more closely to A New Hope. Though, I thought TFA looked wonderful

It did. Whatever issues TFA had, visuals was not one of them.

And what's extra special awesome is that RO is borrowing some looks from TFA. So there is a visual continuity; these films belong to the same universe/continuity. It's really exciting.

Yea, I'm very excited for the concept -- a heist movie set firmly in the SW universe. It could allow for a lot of other interesting avenues to be explored.

Im curious as to how much of a HEIST its going to be. They should have just gotten Danny Ocean and Co, really.

Stop talking about fucking TFA in this thread you shitlords

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

Strat wrote:WHO IS THE CLOAKED FIGURE

Lieutenant Phasma

This took me way longer than it should have to spell out "lieutenant" correctly, btw.