Re: The 47th POTUS - Donald J. Trump
Posted: Tue February 25, 2025 6:42 pm
I try to maintain intellectual honesty. Try.tragabigzanda wrote:conflict resolved
I try to maintain intellectual honesty. Try.tragabigzanda wrote:conflict resolved
Interesting. What am I missing? Is it that Musk is a major donor and probably knows how to flatter?McParadigm wrote:I think people are misunderstanding the direction this is going in, because they misunderstand the relationship.Sloppy Dupree wrote:I’m waiting for the breakup of Trump and Musk. They might be ideological buddies but there’s no way two guys with personality disorders can stay friends for long.
The logic you’re using would have ended this collaboration way before Elon Musk interrupted and answered questions for Donald in the oval office.
The purpose of completing the pipeline is to annex Western Canada and free them of their Ottowan yoke. Deprived of oil revenue, the rest of Canada will see the light and begrudgingly accept their rightful southern overlords.Bi_3 wrote:I'll have to concede this one because we are waaaay beyond my understanding level, but my suspicion is that a 1% global supply increase in refined petroleum is significant price-wise. I don't have evidence for that though so you could very well be correct.Peeps wrote:my bad (always forget to move the decimal point), 1% which does not change anything price wiseBi_3 wrote:You may have a math mistake therePeeps wrote:i mentally interjected big price difference when you stated it would lower prices. i didnt think it would drop 2 dollars a gallon. at best what...maybe 5 cents if we are being generous?
the pipeline would hardly be a blip in the grand scheme of things
the US alone produces approx 13.4 million barrels a day
sure 830K barrels from the pipeline seems a lot compared to that
but the world produces approx 81,804,000 barrels a day
i dont think .01% of more oil produced (never mind it is dirty oil and not crude so I am not even sure in the long run how much of that is going to be usable without being refined significantly) is going to move the needle on gas prices in the least
Missed you brosimple schoolboy wrote:The purpose of completing the pipeline is to annex Western Canada and free them of their Ottowan yoke. Deprived of oil revenue, the rest of Canada will see the light and begrudgingly accept their rightful southern overlords.Bi_3 wrote:I'll have to concede this one because we are waaaay beyond my understanding level, but my suspicion is that a 1% global supply increase in refined petroleum is significant price-wise. I don't have evidence for that though so you could very well be correct.Peeps wrote:my bad (always forget to move the decimal point), 1% which does not change anything price wiseBi_3 wrote:You may have a math mistake therePeeps wrote:i mentally interjected big price difference when you stated it would lower prices. i didnt think it would drop 2 dollars a gallon. at best what...maybe 5 cents if we are being generous?
the pipeline would hardly be a blip in the grand scheme of things
the US alone produces approx 13.4 million barrels a day
sure 830K barrels from the pipeline seems a lot compared to that
but the world produces approx 81,804,000 barrels a day
i dont think .01% of more oil produced (never mind it is dirty oil and not crude so I am not even sure in the long run how much of that is going to be usable without being refined significantly) is going to move the needle on gas prices in the least
Quebec might get to stay their own thing, we don't need their headache.
Donald Trump encourages Musk like a cheerleader. He defers to him when somebody asks a question. He is entirely absent of jealousy for the attention that Musk gets.Sloppy Dupree wrote:Interesting. What am I missing? Is it that Musk is a major donor and probably knows how to flatter?McParadigm wrote:I think people are misunderstanding the direction this is going in, because they misunderstand the relationship.Sloppy Dupree wrote:I’m waiting for the breakup of Trump and Musk. They might be ideological buddies but there’s no way two guys with personality disorders can stay friends for long.
The logic you’re using would have ended this collaboration way before Elon Musk interrupted and answered questions for Donald in the oval office.
Makes sense. Just think: if Trump and Musk had loving daddies, we wouldn’t be here right now. At least not with these two particular people. But as the events of the last ten or so years show, the whims of these two particular people can shape the fabric of reality on earth.McParadigm wrote:Donald Trump encourages Musk like a cheerleader. He defers to him when somebody asks a question. He is entirely absent of jealousy for the attention that Musk gets.Sloppy Dupree wrote:Interesting. What am I missing? Is it that Musk is a major donor and probably knows how to flatter?McParadigm wrote:I think people are misunderstanding the direction this is going in, because they misunderstand the relationship.Sloppy Dupree wrote:I’m waiting for the breakup of Trump and Musk. They might be ideological buddies but there’s no way two guys with personality disorders can stay friends for long.
The logic you’re using would have ended this collaboration way before Elon Musk interrupted and answered questions for Donald in the oval office.
Elon Musk is richer than Donald Trump and Elon Musk makes Donald Trump feel big.
Having a rich and powerful man who approves of him and gets things done speaks to a lifetime of daddy issues. Trump has the thing he really wants, which is to be a president who is treated like a king while making back room deals. Elon takes care of all the presidential stuff (delivering on promises) he never liked in the first place.
There will always be somebody else to blame for the things that go wrong. And I’m not sure Donald Trump would really know how to shut Elon Musk down at this point even if he wanted to. They would each stand to lose some of the kids in the divorce, and that audience is essential to their power.
spike wrote:elderly people get bruises like that all the time. doesn't take much.
Please be respectful.BurtReynolds wrote:Woah! That's incredibly profound. I can no longer stick to my "other people shouldn't be allowed to be who they are" position that I definitely took. I admit I was wrong. You've won!spike wrote:what opinion? just let everyone be who they are.BurtReynolds wrote:It's so weird lol. They haven't offered any opinions on the subjects at hand. It's just personal attacks! I'm worried about these guys. How are they gonna survive the new board rules?Dev wrote:You two literally hate Burt so much you can forgot your own differences with eachother? Sort of remarkable.spike wrote:I’d say a coward above all. It’s easy going through life only giving a shit about yourself.Ello Sailor wrote:You're an imbecile. Respectfully.
let them be free, as you so often tout.
This is good! Feel free to share your opinions on the news and debate topics at hand more often!
The good news is Trump has destroyed the conservative movement in Canada. Liberals are leading in the polls here for the first time in 4 years.simple schoolboy wrote:The purpose of completing the pipeline is to annex Western Canada and free them of their Ottowan yoke. Deprived of oil revenue, the rest of Canada will see the light and begrudgingly accept their rightful southern overlords.Bi_3 wrote:I'll have to concede this one because we are waaaay beyond my understanding level, but my suspicion is that a 1% global supply increase in refined petroleum is significant price-wise. I don't have evidence for that though so you could very well be correct.Peeps wrote:my bad (always forget to move the decimal point), 1% which does not change anything price wiseBi_3 wrote:You may have a math mistake therePeeps wrote:i mentally interjected big price difference when you stated it would lower prices. i didnt think it would drop 2 dollars a gallon. at best what...maybe 5 cents if we are being generous?
the pipeline would hardly be a blip in the grand scheme of things
the US alone produces approx 13.4 million barrels a day
sure 830K barrels from the pipeline seems a lot compared to that
but the world produces approx 81,804,000 barrels a day
i dont think .01% of more oil produced (never mind it is dirty oil and not crude so I am not even sure in the long run how much of that is going to be usable without being refined significantly) is going to move the needle on gas prices in the least
Quebec might get to stay their own thing, we don't need their headache.
Legit:Bi_3 wrote:Rumor: Ukraine has agreed to a reduced Trump rare earth deal