Page 312 of 424

Re: The 47th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed February 26, 2025 8:55 am
by dimejinky99
The bearded belly dancers were a strange touch. In a whole load of strange.

Thought he would be against that kind of thing.

Re: The 47th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed February 26, 2025 9:32 am
by Dev
dimejinky99 wrote:The bearded belly dancers were a strange touch. In a whole load of strange.

Thought he would be against that kind of thing.
Dime, I truly think it is a sign the worst evil is on the way.

They are normalizing the idea of colonizing Palestine with a comedic video.

Re: The 47th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed February 26, 2025 10:02 am
by dimejinky99
A dashing vibrant shade of genocide.

Wonder what the colour scheme is for the genocide in West Bank?

Hopefully something complimentary.

Re: Re: The 47th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed February 26, 2025 11:41 am
by BurtReynolds
Lol Trump Gaza.

A man with a vision!

Re: The 47th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed February 26, 2025 11:53 am
by Bi_3
Actual news!


Trump budget blueprint advancing: https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/25/politics ... index.html

Ukraine deal with Trump (war ending?): https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/25/europe/u ... index.html

Reckless and dangerous as it is, things are getting done

Re: The 47th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed February 26, 2025 1:55 pm
by Self
Bi_3 wrote:Reckless and dangerous as it is, things are getting done
and historically unpopular, I would guess

Re: The 47th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed February 26, 2025 1:58 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
Bi_3 wrote:
Reckless and dangerous as it is, things are getting done
So a net "win" in your opinion?

Re: The 47th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed February 26, 2025 2:26 pm
by BurtReynolds
Self wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:Reckless and dangerous as it is, things are getting done
and historically unpopular, I would guess
Definitely not, at least so far.

But is anything actually getting done? Reaching a peace deal with only the losing party in a war doesn't strike me as very valuable.

And lol at the budget.

Re: Re: The 47th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed February 26, 2025 2:43 pm
by tragabigzanda
FUCK ICE

Re: The 47th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed February 26, 2025 2:46 pm
by Bi_3
BurtReynolds wrote:
Self wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:Reckless and dangerous as it is, things are getting done
and historically unpopular, I would guess
Definitely not, at least so far.

But is anything actually getting done? Reaching a peace deal with only the losing party in a war doesn't strike me as very valuable.

And lol at the budget.

Without knowing the details, I suspect that a deal that secures access to supplies of rare earth metals in Ukraine by placing US persons and businesses in that country is probably the best deterrent to further Russian military aggression. It doesn't get the occupied land back, but it stops the killing and gives us access to some of the materials we will need when China takes Taiwan and we don't have those fabs to depend on anymore.

Agree the budget is a joke though. DOGE causes utter chaos in DC to save like $50B and the budget adds 5-6x that this year alone in new debt.

Re: The 47th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed February 26, 2025 2:51 pm
by 4/5
Bi_3 wrote:
Agree the budget is a joke though. DOGE causes utter chaos in DC to save like $50B and the budget adds 5-6x that this year alone in new debt.
Who could have seen this coming??!?!?!?!?

Re: Re: The 47th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed February 26, 2025 2:57 pm
by BurtReynolds
I'll be happy when Congress starts doing it's job and giving his EOs some teeth.

Re: The 47th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed February 26, 2025 2:57 pm
by tragabigzanda
FUCK ICE

Re: The 47th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed February 26, 2025 3:34 pm
by dimejinky99
Fascinate the fools and muzzle the intelligent.

Re: Re: The 47th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed February 26, 2025 4:26 pm
by Peeps
BurtReynolds wrote:I'll be happy when Congress starts doing it's job and giving his EOs some teeth.
umm their job is not to just blanket fund EO's

Re: The 47th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed February 26, 2025 4:33 pm
by BurtReynolds
I should have emphasized the AND part.

Re: Re: The 47th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed February 26, 2025 5:08 pm
by tommy
This thread is draining the life from the board. It should be deleted.

Re: The 47th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed February 26, 2025 5:12 pm
by Peeps
BurtReynolds wrote:I should have emphasized the AND part.

again...that isnt their job wether you emphasize AND or not

congress can block a EO by passing legislation that invalidates it or just not provide funding for it.

considering that the R's hold both houses maybe the problem is the EO's just arent good EOs and they realize in the next midtems if they do pass them they are basically signing up to get voted out of office

Re: The 47th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed February 26, 2025 5:25 pm
by wease
Bi_3 wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
Self wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:Reckless and dangerous as it is, things are getting done
and historically unpopular, I would guess
Definitely not, at least so far.

But is anything actually getting done? Reaching a peace deal with only the losing party in a war doesn't strike me as very valuable.

And lol at the budget.

Without knowing the details, I suspect that a deal that secures access to supplies of rare earth metals in Ukraine by placing US persons and businesses in that country is probably the best deterrent to further Russian military aggression. It doesn't get the occupied land back, but it stops the killing and gives us access to some of the materials we will need when China takes Taiwan and we don't have those fabs to depend on anymore.

Agree the budget is a joke though. DOGE causes utter chaos in DC to save like $50B and the budget adds 5-6x that this year alone in new debt.
And how much of that is for contracts to Musk and the other oligarchs Trump is indebted to?

Re: The 47th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Posted: Wed February 26, 2025 5:36 pm
by BurtReynolds
Peeps wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:I should have emphasized the AND part.

again...that isnt their job wether you emphasize AND or not

congress can block a EO by passing legislation that invalidates it or just not provide funding for it.

considering that the R's hold both houses maybe the problem is the EO's just arent good EOs and they realize in the next midtems if they do pass them they are basically signing up to get voted out of office
Thanks for the civics lesson, but don't overthink what I said.

And given the polls, much of it isn't unpopular, and ruling parties almost always lose seats in midterms anyway. Political capital is meant to be spent.