Red Mosquito

Bi_3 wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

wease wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

cutuphalfdead wrote:Habit is fucking awesome and I will not hear otherwise.

Pete. It sucks. I'm sorry.

It does not.

Wease. It really does. I'm sorry.

Trump buying Greenland makes more sense than this post

Wease is the posters name. Habit is terrible. I feel badly about that because Pete and Wease (both RMers) seem to want it to be good. The format of my post to Wease was a reference to the format of my previous post to Pete. So it was a "callback" of sorts.

I hope that helps it make sense.

I get how posting works, I was trying to politely point out you keep making this ridiculous typo

durdencommatyler wrote:I don't know, Bi... every time I look it up, it's spelled "Habit." And that's how Pete spelled it, too. I don't think I'm spelling it wrong. So, it's not a typo at all. Sorry buddy.

Bammer wrote:We are on page 314 of anticipating the follow up to a record containing Swallowed Whole? Really?

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

Bammer wrote:We are on page 314 of anticipating the follow up to a record containing Swallowed Whole? Really?

I started this thread before LB was released. Lol

Bammer wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

Bammer wrote:We are on page 314 of anticipating the follow up to a record containing Swallowed Whole? Really?

I started this thread before LB was released. Lol

Predicting a quicker turnaround to boot!

Oh we were so young and naive back then, weren’t we?

Sgt. Crackpot wrote:

Bammer wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

Bammer wrote:We are on page 314 of anticipating the follow up to a record containing Swallowed Whole? Really?

I started this thread before LB was released. Lol

Predicting a quicker turnaround to boot!

Oh we were so young and naive back then, weren’t we?

We were fools.

And we still are.

lecherouslittlestump wrote:Single dropping in September with a release in November. Tour dates announced in September.

Bi_3 wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:I don't know, Bi... every time I look it up, it's spelled "Habit." And that's how Pete spelled it, too. I don't think I'm spelling it wrong. So, it's not a typo at all. Sorry buddy.

I love you man, but you spelled “terrific” wrong.

Anders wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:

Anders wrote:Which band in history has been at a similar point to where Pearl Jam are now? Approaching a 30 year career, releasing less albums, but still around. Fans eagerly awating a new album. And how good were those albums?

I can’t think of one that’s really the same. GNR disbanded during the long wait for Chinese Democracy, and the Stones didn’t even start to slow until the late 90s.

Maybe The Who?

When I was a kid, The Who just seemed to be completely gone. I think after Keith Moon died they were never the same. But I'm surprised if there aren't other bands.

Springsteen is a good example, although he is a solo artist, and not exactly what I was thinking of.

Kevin Davis wrote:

Anders wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:

Anders wrote:Which band in history has been at a similar point to where Pearl Jam are now? Approaching a 30 year career, releasing less albums, but still around. Fans eagerly awating a new album. And how good were those albums?

I can’t think of one that’s really the same. GNR disbanded during the long wait for Chinese Democracy, and the Stones didn’t even start to slow until the late 90s.

Maybe The Who?

When I was a kid, The Who just seemed to be completely gone. I think after Keith Moon died they were never the same. But I'm surprised if there aren't other bands.

Springsteen is a good example, although he is a solo artist, and not exactly what I was thinking of.

The Who really is a pretty good parallel. An incredible 10 year run, 6-7 more years of occasionally enjoyable foundering, and then....touring.

When Eddie said he wanted to be just like Pete Townshend when he grew up, he really did mean at all stages of grown up.

wease wrote:

Kevin Davis wrote:

Anders wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:

Anders wrote:Which band in history has been at a similar point to where Pearl Jam are now? Approaching a 30 year career, releasing less albums, but still around. Fans eagerly awating a new album. And how good were those albums?

I can’t think of one that’s really the same. GNR disbanded during the long wait for Chinese Democracy, and the Stones didn’t even start to slow until the late 90s.

Maybe The Who?

When I was a kid, The Who just seemed to be completely gone. I think after Keith Moon died they were never the same. But I'm surprised if there aren't other bands.

Springsteen is a good example, although he is a solo artist, and not exactly what I was thinking of.

The Who really is a pretty good parallel. An incredible 10 year run, 6-7 more years of occasionally enjoyable foundering, and then....touring.

When Eddie said he wanted to be just like Pete Townshend when he grew up, he really did mean at all stages of grown up.

Even pedophilia?

Kevin Davis wrote:

Anders wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:

Anders wrote:Which band in history has been at a similar point to where Pearl Jam are now? Approaching a 30 year career, releasing less albums, but still around. Fans eagerly awating a new album. And how good were those albums?

I can’t think of one that’s really the same. GNR disbanded during the long wait for Chinese Democracy, and the Stones didn’t even start to slow until the late 90s.

Maybe The Who?

When I was a kid, The Who just seemed to be completely gone. I think after Keith Moon died they were never the same. But I'm surprised if there aren't other bands.

Springsteen is a good example, although he is a solo artist, and not exactly what I was thinking of.

The Who really is a pretty good parallel. An incredible 10 year run, 6-7 more years of occasionally enjoyable foundering, and then....touring.

When Eddie said he wanted to be just like Pete Townshend when he grew up, he really did mean at all stages of grown up.