Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread
Posted: Wed October 23, 2013 4:25 pm
I've been thinking about locking the revote option to really up the anxiety level
please don'tstip wrote:I've been thinking about locking the revote option to really up the anxiety level
166,000 first week. Don't think I saw a link to this, but here it is:evenslow wrote:JAMILY:
Congrats on the #1 album this week, we really made it happen for the boys.
We really deserve to celebrate this one team. The speculation thread alone was probably worth 50,000 in sales so what I'm saying is harmless is the real 6th member of Pearl Jam now.EJ wrote:166,000 first week. Don't think I saw a link to this, but here it is:evenslow wrote:JAMILY:
Congrats on the #1 album this week, we really made it happen for the boys.
http://www.billboard.com/articles/news/ ... lboard-200
i still havent votedstip wrote:I've been thinking about locking the revote option to really up the anxiety level
Yellow Moon is the one where I enjoy everything about Ed.stip wrote:Ed being up front so much was a choice by BoB. Works well in some of the slower songs and less effectively in the faster songs. I like him where he is in yellow moon, but less so in l-bolt (or pendulum--those are the two biggest offenders).
Yeah, and it definitely isn't an album that works with every mood. I'm cranky without reason today and it definitely does not fit that.harmless wrote:The album doesn't have infinite depth, so I'd just enjoy it for what it is and come back to it when you're in the mood. I still think "Sirens" is the most fully-realised, deep piece of awesome on this album.
The one and only thing I can't stand on the song is how he sings Wind. (Which you captured wonderfully I might add!). Second verse onward makes up for it though.Mike wrote:Yellow Moon is the one where I enjoy everything about Ed.stip wrote:Ed being up front so much was a choice by BoB. Works well in some of the slower songs and less effectively in the faster songs. I like him where he is in yellow moon, but less so in l-bolt (or pendulum--those are the two biggest offenders).
I think I'll take a break from LB for a while to let it settle in a bit. Swallowed Whole actually annoyed me right now.D-D-DROOOWN DROWN DROWN DROWN wwhiihiiyyyspuuhered suuoonnggs inside the weeyyuuhnd (Maybe my mood just isn't very good right now)
That third vocal tick that I couldn't remember is in SBM, when he sings "I believe in love and disaster". He says "disastgrer." I'm not sure why.Mike wrote:Yeah, and it definitely isn't an album that works with every mood. I'm cranky without reason today and it definitely does not fit that.harmless wrote:The album doesn't have infinite depth, so I'd just enjoy it for what it is and come back to it when you're in the mood. I still think "Sirens" is the most fully-realised, deep piece of awesome on this album.![]()
Breathe in forgivenee-
No
McP (probably) had a good post about this a while back. Pearl Jam's demographic is more likely to be buying albums. Newer artists are more likely to have people seeking out their music in other wayssward wrote:You know, the more I think about it, the more I am amazed that PJ still is grabbing a number one album and even though 166K is way less than the old days, it is not a paltry number nowadays in the grand scheme of things. They outsold a lot of bands that are more 'popular' nowadays and they outsold some older acts that one might lump them in with in general. Well done boys.
Its stronger than both of them not only in sales but in chart position too ( KA was 5 and TDPDH was number 2).stip wrote:how does this compare to the debut numbers for King Animal or The Devil Put Dinosaurs Here?
Ah yeah...that makes sense. Thanks for bursting my bubblestip wrote:McP (probably) had a good post about this a while back. Pearl Jam's demographic is more likely to be buying albums. Newer artists are more likely to have people seeking out their music in other wayssward wrote:You know, the more I think about it, the more I am amazed that PJ still is grabbing a number one album and even though 166K is way less than the old days, it is not a paltry number nowadays in the grand scheme of things. They outsold a lot of bands that are more 'popular' nowadays and they outsold some older acts that one might lump them in with in general. Well done boys.
I have no idea who that is.Still, it's the largest debut week for any rock album since last November, when Phillip Phillips' "The World From the Side of the Moon" bowed with 169,000.