Thank you for your service.E.H. Ruddock wrote:This took me way longer than it should have to spell out "lieutenant" correctly, btw.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Lieutenant PhasmaStrat wrote:WHO IS THE CLOAKED FIGURE
Star Wars: Rogue One
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85142
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85142
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Yeah, where do you jabronies get off, talking about Star Wars in a Star Wars thread!LoathedVermin72 wrote:Stop talking about fucking TFA in this thread you shitlords
- LetMeSleep
- Posting (live)
- Posts: 18003
- Joined: Wed February 06, 2013 2:47 am
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Scooby Doo
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Not at all. I just mean they felt like he was in a present day, earth as the setting, movie. We can't have hipsters and millenials infiltrating the dialogue in a Star Wars movie.LetMeSleep wrote:Is this a race thing?E.H. Ruddock wrote:I don't know, Finn's delivery on some lines were very out of place for a Star Wars movie.McParadigm wrote:Force Awakens didn't have a lot of individually "bad" lines. It's problem was that 90% of them were either exposition or shouted stage directions. There wasn't a lot below the surface.
"This is a map to Luke Skywalker."
"I will take the map to the Resistance."
"Good. (Looking directly at audience) It's important and there are stakes."
Later...
"Run over here!"
"I can't because I'm fixing a thing!"
"I'm going to try something then, so we can-"
"Wait! Look at those xwings! Those are the resistance!"
"Thank you for explaining that to the audience for me!"

VS

- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85142
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Finn's stuff didn't really bug me. I can understand why people have that criticism, I suppose. But it's not something I would haven noticed or thought to critique if others hadn't brought it up to me. It's a massive galaxy. There are a lot of dialects and speech patterns.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85142
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
I have to say the AT-AT shots didn't really do anything for me. There was no emotional response to their presence. The shots are gorgeous but they could have been a new piece of machinery and had the same affect on me. Ditto the Falcon in TFA trailers, though. Perhaps "iconography" in Star Wars means very little to me.
Then again, that shot of the downed Star Destroyer in TFA took my breath away. But again, I think it was the shot not the fact of the Star Destroyer? Maybe?
Then again, that shot of the downed Star Destroyer in TFA took my breath away. But again, I think it was the shot not the fact of the Star Destroyer? Maybe?
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35416
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Keep working it out and you will get there.durdencommatyler wrote:I have to say the AT-AT shots didn't really do anything for me. There was no emotional response to their presence. The shots are gorgeous but they could have been a new piece of machinery and had the same affect on me. Ditto the Falcon in TFA trailers, though. Perhaps "iconography" in Star Wars means very little to me.
Then again, that shot of the downed Star Destroyer in TFA took my breath away. But again, I think it was the shot not the fact of the Star Destroyer? Maybe?
The AT At's were too far away which makes me feel they were digitally placed. I dont know. I didnt love it either.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
It's not at all about the iconography for me. It's about Edwards' visual composition. He's a master.durdencommatyler wrote:I have to say the AT-AT shots didn't really do anything for me. There was no emotional response to their presence. The shots are gorgeous but they could have been a new piece of machinery and had the same affect on me. Ditto the Falcon in TFA trailers, though. Perhaps "iconography" in Star Wars means very little to me.
Then again, that shot of the downed Star Destroyer in TFA took my breath away. But again, I think it was the shot not the fact of the Star Destroyer? Maybe?
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85142
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Sure. I figured that's what you were responding to. Did you have any kind of response or positive reaction to the downed Star Destroyer shot in TFA? Or any of those similar shots; shots that expressed visual composition? I know Abrams and Edwards have different styles but I'm just curious, if you lay aside how much you dislike JJ in general, was there anything in the move that worked for you in this regard? Or was it all just flat garbage to you?LoathedVermin72 wrote:It's not at all about the iconography for me. It's about Edwards' visual composition. He's a master.durdencommatyler wrote:I have to say the AT-AT shots didn't really do anything for me. There was no emotional response to their presence. The shots are gorgeous but they could have been a new piece of machinery and had the same affect on me. Ditto the Falcon in TFA trailers, though. Perhaps "iconography" in Star Wars means very little to me.
Then again, that shot of the downed Star Destroyer in TFA took my breath away. But again, I think it was the shot not the fact of the Star Destroyer? Maybe?
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85142
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Also, this ninja is interesting. I can't wait to learn more about his context in this thing. Is he blind? Why don't the Strom Troopers just fucking shoot him? Is it a coincidence that we have characters in both of the most recent Star Wars films fighting with staffs?
I haven't read any spoilers or anything for this. Is it possible Felicity's character turns? Is she a double agent? I can't say that I'm more excited by this first trailer than I was by the first Force Awakens trailer, but I'm certainly not less excited.
I haven't read any spoilers or anything for this. Is it possible Felicity's character turns? Is she a double agent? I can't say that I'm more excited by this first trailer than I was by the first Force Awakens trailer, but I'm certainly not less excited.
- Greedo
- A Return To Form
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Wed December 10, 2014 6:14 pm
- Location: Basse-Terre
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
This was a good time to be alive
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35416
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
I'm less excited because im a rube but i was absurdly excited for TFA. I'm curious about these new characters and this storyline ( i think its a great idea for a film) but i know im not going to be emotionally invested in them over the next 5 years or whatever.durdencommatyler wrote:Also, this ninja is interesting. I can't wait to learn more about his context in this thing. Is he blind? Why don't the Strom Troopers just fucking shoot him? Is it a coincidence that we have characters in both of the most recent Star Wars films fighting with staffs?
I haven't read any spoilers or anything for this. Is it possible Felicity's character turns? Is she a double agent? I can't say that I'm more excited by this first trailer than I was by the first Force Awakens trailer, but I'm certainly not less excited.
Also, can we digitally place some of these new characters in the background of some scenes in A New Hope come next special release?
- dprival78
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:13 pm
- Location: CT
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
ninjas and palm trees.. star wars firsts
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
It reminded me of looking up at the giant octo aliens in Monsters. They were way more threatening in that teaser than they've been in any other SW movie.LoathedVermin72 wrote:It's not at all about the iconography for me. It's about Edwards' visual composition. He's a master.durdencommatyler wrote:I have to say the AT-AT shots didn't really do anything for me. There was no emotional response to their presence. The shots are gorgeous but they could have been a new piece of machinery and had the same affect on me. Ditto the Falcon in TFA trailers, though. Perhaps "iconography" in Star Wars means very little to me.
Then again, that shot of the downed Star Destroyer in TFA took my breath away. But again, I think it was the shot not the fact of the Star Destroyer? Maybe?
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85142
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Sure. I get what you're saying. I'm just trying to compare the content of the first TFA trailer directly to the content of this first RO trailer. This might be the better trailer, ignoring all the other baggage.Strat wrote:I'm less excited because im a rube but i was absurdly excited for TFA. I'm curious about these new characters and this storyline ( i think its a great idea for a film) but i know im not going to be emotionally invested in them over the next 5 years or whatever.durdencommatyler wrote:Also, this ninja is interesting. I can't wait to learn more about his context in this thing. Is he blind? Why don't the Strom Troopers just fucking shoot him? Is it a coincidence that we have characters in both of the most recent Star Wars films fighting with staffs?
I haven't read any spoilers or anything for this. Is it possible Felicity's character turns? Is she a double agent? I can't say that I'm more excited by this first trailer than I was by the first Force Awakens trailer, but I'm certainly not less excited.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
LetMeSleep wrote:Looks like North Greenwich tube station.Strat wrote:
Did they get a T800 from Cyberdine?
Fuck!! It really does!!
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85142
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Oh hey! Verm, I didn't realize that was Diego Luna. #BloodFathersForLife
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
The downed destroyer was cool. I don't think Abrams expressed the same sense of scale, menace, or sublime awe that Edwards is so adept at conveying, but it was a nice visual.durdencommatyler wrote:Sure. I figured that's what you were responding to. Did you have any kind of response or positive reaction to the downed Star Destroyer shot in TFA? Or any of those similar shots; shots that expressed visual composition? I know Abrams and Edwards have different styles but I'm just curious, if you lay aside how much you dislike JJ in general, was there anything in the move that worked for you in this regard? Or was it all just flat garbage to you?LoathedVermin72 wrote:It's not at all about the iconography for me. It's about Edwards' visual composition. He's a master.durdencommatyler wrote:I have to say the AT-AT shots didn't really do anything for me. There was no emotional response to their presence. The shots are gorgeous but they could have been a new piece of machinery and had the same affect on me. Ditto the Falcon in TFA trailers, though. Perhaps "iconography" in Star Wars means very little to me.
Then again, that shot of the downed Star Destroyer in TFA took my breath away. But again, I think it was the shot not the fact of the Star Destroyer? Maybe?
I still think the initial leaked teaser for this gives a better taste of Edwards' real talent, and what will make this film so good.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85142
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
So, the screenwriter on this wrote Antz and Nutty Professor II: The Klumps.
How worried should we really be?
How worried should we really be?
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
This movie has a fantastic cast. That shot of Mendelsohn? Fuhgeddaboutitdurdencommatyler wrote:Oh hey! Verm, I didn't realize that was Diego Luna. #BloodFathersForLife
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85142
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Yeah, I knew he was in this but I didn't even recognize him in that shot. It was fantastic and one of the best shots in the trailer. This cast is outstanding.LoathedVermin72 wrote:This movie has a fantastic cast. That shot of Mendelsohn? Fuhgeddaboutitdurdencommatyler wrote:Oh hey! Verm, I didn't realize that was Diego Luna. #BloodFathersForLife
