Red Mosquito

no you're not

I'm sure that Chucky was highlighting the problem of Asian on Asian bigotry.

spike wrote:no you're not

Hmong were involved in anti-communist activity, so they must have priviledge. Cambodians suffered mass killings, but those that resisted were probably wreckers and kulaks. Can you tell me how many priviledge points each group has? I assume this is a scale like Kelvin, where absolute zero goes to ADOS.

You align with the political movement that has flattened the entirety of Asian cultures into "AAPI" for political coalition convenience, but yeah, I'm the one homogenizing Asian identity.

Yet, somehow, I can still think for myself.

Wait, is this third shooting in California an old Asian guy as well?

BurtReynolds wrote:Wait, is this third shooting in California an old Asian guy as well?

The Oakland one? No. That was a hit on a music video shoot.

Old Asian dudes responsible for:
Half Moon Bay
Monterey Park

Unless I missed one

The U.S. has had at least 39 mass shootings in just 24 days so far this year

simple schoolboy wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:Wait, is this third shooting in California an old Asian guy as well?

The Oakland one? No. That was a hit on a music video shoot.

Old Asian dudes responsible for:
Half Moon Bay
Monterey Park

Unless I missed one

oh ok, since it was on a video shoot it gets an * and doesnt count

Peeps wrote:

simple schoolboy wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:Wait, is this third shooting in California an old Asian guy as well?

The Oakland one? No. That was a hit on a music video shoot.

Old Asian dudes responsible for:
Half Moon Bay
Monterey Park

Unless I missed one

oh ok, since it was on a video shoot it gets an * and doesnt count

? The shooters were not ID'd as elderly Asian men, which was the question.

I suppose it's possible multiple vehicles full of AARP eligible Asian males rolled up on a rap music video shoot and proceeded to light up the place, and none of the witnesses accurately described the scene, but it seems unlikely.

Is there an argument here or just a contest to see who can say the least human thing in the face of tragedy?

B wrote:Is there an argument here or just a contest to see who can say the least human thing in the face of tragedy?

Burt asked a question, I answered it, and Peeps seemingly misunderstood.

ugh. i hate this. ssb is correct :/

stay classy

Stickman wrote:stay classy

I saw that yesterday. It's such a weird way to honor the 2nd amendment or whatever they are trying to accomplish. It's extremely tacky and in poor taste. I'll add childish as well.

i think it's great, anyone who thinks the people who wrote the 2nd amendment intended for citizens to have those types of weapons is a fuckin idiot. can we call it "the fucking idiot" pin?

"Don't quote laws to we who carry swords guns."

blueviper wrote:

Stickman wrote:stay classy

I saw that yesterday. It's such a weird way to honor the 2nd amendment or whatever they are trying to accomplish. It's extremely tacky and in poor taste. I'll add childish as well.

I think most of the ways Senators and Representatives behave around guns seems pretty childish.

B wrote:

blueviper wrote:

Stickman wrote:stay classy

I saw that yesterday. It's such a weird way to honor the 2nd amendment or whatever they are trying to accomplish. It's extremely tacky and in poor taste. I'll add childish as well.

I think most of the ways Senators and Representatives behave around guns seems pretty childish.

The militia probably should have SA-2s or better in it's inventory. Some bored dude in Alaska could have ended this a week ago.