Page 329 of 508

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Mon August 21, 2017 2:49 pm
by Monkey_Driven
malice wrote:can someone explain why they didn't draw out the series to two more years of full seasons? What was the problem? This series has a huge following, their rating destroy everything else, including porn, apparently, and they must make money hand over fist... why ruin it in the final (2 really 1 and a half) seasons like this?

I don't read the volume of online stuff everyone else does, has there been anything written on it?
Mostly a cost/logistics issue. Although it is hugely popular it is still the most expensive TV show ever produced. The actors keep getting more and more expensive as well.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Mon August 21, 2017 2:52 pm
by Chris_H_2
Monkey_Driven wrote:The Benjen save can easily be explained by Bran sending him there. Benjen has the ability to communicate with ravens. I would like that a lot. Bran has to wield some of his powers.
but that, in addition to virtually everything, was just all too convenient. like being surrounded by 10,000 wights and having the ocean 11 guys fight them all one by one, when we've seen wights smother people by the 10's and 20's in previous episodes.

honestly, for a moment i thought jon snow was dead when he got pulled down into that lake by the wights. i was shocked, and sad, but OK with it. it honestly would have lent some legitimacy to this season. but then . . . against all odds . . .

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Mon August 21, 2017 2:59 pm
by Monkey_Driven
Chris_H_2 wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:The Benjen save can easily be explained by Bran sending him there. Benjen has the ability to communicate with ravens. I would like that a lot. Bran has to wield some of his powers.
but that, in addition to virtually everything, was just all too convenient. like being surrounded by 10,000 wights and having the ocean 11 guys fight them all one by one, when we've seen wights smother people by the 10's and 20's in previous episodes.

honestly, for a moment i thought jon snow was dead when he got pulled down into that lake by the wights. i was shocked, and sad, but OK with it. it honestly would have lent some legitimacy to this season. but then . . . against all odds . . .
Of course.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Mon August 21, 2017 3:01 pm
by EJ
Entertaining, but jeezus so much suspension of disbelief required to really enjoy this episode.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Mon August 21, 2017 3:40 pm
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Mon August 21, 2017 3:42 pm
by Monkey_Driven
tragabigzanda wrote:
EJ wrote:Entertaining, but jeezus so much suspension of disbelief required to really enjoy this episode.
Yes, very fun but no more depth than an episode of Entourage.
It honestly felt like a Marvel movie.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Mon August 21, 2017 3:50 pm
by Bammer
As a non-history-buff I'm probably off by a liiiittttle, but just bear with me. Let's say for sake of argument, in earth time, this show is set about 800 years ago. OK? Good.

I think it's pretty cool that the term "ginger" has been around since the 13th century.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Mon August 21, 2017 4:01 pm
by Norah
stip wrote:
Mecca wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:Read the books. The story doesn't suck there.
some of it does
the last two books were a steep drop off in quality from the first three
no they weren't

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Mon August 21, 2017 4:01 pm
by Norah
malice wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:The last two were mostly awful.
Ok, so the series actually IS following the books. great
no it's not

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Mon August 21, 2017 4:02 pm
by Monkey_Driven
cutuphalfdead wrote:
stip wrote:
Mecca wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:Read the books. The story doesn't suck there.
some of it does
the last two books were a steep drop off in quality from the first three
no they weren't
Yeah, they're pretty good.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Mon August 21, 2017 4:22 pm
by EJ
Monkey_Driven wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
stip wrote:
Mecca wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:Read the books. The story doesn't suck there.
some of it does
the last two books were a steep drop off in quality from the first three
no they weren't
Yeah, they're pretty good.
meh, i agree with the others. the last two were pretty forgetful.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Mon August 21, 2017 4:30 pm
by Monkey_Driven
EJ wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
stip wrote:
Mecca wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:Read the books. The story doesn't suck there.
some of it does
the last two books were a steep drop off in quality from the first three
no they weren't
Yeah, they're pretty good.
meh, i agree with the others. the last two were pretty forgetful.
I'm rereading them now and there's a ton of good stuff in here (worldbuilding, character moments, etc.). There's just not as much action, more aftermath.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Mon August 21, 2017 4:33 pm
by Norah
Monkey_Driven wrote:
EJ wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
stip wrote:
Mecca wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:Read the books. The story doesn't suck there.
some of it does
the last two books were a steep drop off in quality from the first three
no they weren't
Yeah, they're pretty good.
meh, i agree with the others. the last two were pretty forgetful.
I'm rereading them now and there's a ton of good stuff in here (worldbuilding, character moments, etc.). There's just not as much action, more aftermath.
It's almost as if it's the second act.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Mon August 21, 2017 4:33 pm
by BurtReynolds
Cercei whines through an entire book, only broken up with scene after scene of two people walking and talking about history.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Mon August 21, 2017 4:35 pm
by Monkey_Driven
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
EJ wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
stip wrote:
Mecca wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:Read the books. The story doesn't suck there.
some of it does
the last two books were a steep drop off in quality from the first three
no they weren't
Yeah, they're pretty good.
meh, i agree with the others. the last two were pretty forgetful.
I'm rereading them now and there's a ton of good stuff in here (worldbuilding, character moments, etc.). There's just not as much action, more aftermath.
It's almost as if it's the second act.
Yup, building up to a pretty thrilling sixth book when it is released in 2089.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Mon August 21, 2017 4:51 pm
by Norah
BurtReynolds wrote:Cercei whines through an entire book, only broken up with scene after scene of two people walking and talking about history.
Don't you slander the good name of Nimble Dick.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Mon August 21, 2017 4:55 pm
by Monkey_Driven
cutuphalfdead wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Cercei whines through an entire book, only broken up with scene after scene of two people walking and talking about history.
Don't you slander the good name of Nimble Dick.
One of my top five chapters from Feast of Crows was Brienne and Septon Meribald walking and talking.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Mon August 21, 2017 4:56 pm
by Norah
Monkey_Driven wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Cercei whines through an entire book, only broken up with scene after scene of two people walking and talking about history.
Don't you slander the good name of Nimble Dick.
One of my top five chapters from Feast of Crows was Brienne and Septon Meribald walking and talking.
don't forget Dog. love that dog.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Mon August 21, 2017 4:58 pm
by Monkey_Driven
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Cercei whines through an entire book, only broken up with scene after scene of two people walking and talking about history.
Don't you slander the good name of Nimble Dick.
One of my top five chapters from Feast of Crows was Brienne and Septon Meribald walking and talking.
don't forget Dog. love that dog.
I would never...

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Mon August 21, 2017 5:04 pm
by Anders
malice wrote:can someone explain why they didn't draw out the series to two more years of full seasons? What was the problem? This series has a huge following, their rating destroy everything else, including porn, apparently, and they must make money hand over fist... why ruin it in the final (2 really 1 and a half) seasons like this?

I don't read the volume of online stuff everyone else does, has there been anything written on it?
HBO and Martin wanted them to. But the showrunners said no.