Page 34 of 175
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Mon February 10, 2014 5:33 pm
by Green Habit
numbers wrote:Glad the Sox are going back to the previous road unis. The ones they were using the last few years were such a drag.
I agree. The recent ones were a nice throwback for a little while but the change gives me fond childhood memories.
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Mon February 10, 2014 5:41 pm
by Coach
Green Habit wrote:numbers wrote:Glad the Sox are going back to the previous road unis. The ones they were using the last few years were such a drag.
I agree. The recent ones were a nice throwback for a little while but the change gives me fond childhood memories.
It's a nice change. Here's link for anyone interested:
http://espn.go.com/blog/boston/red-sox/ ... ad-jerseys
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Mon February 10, 2014 5:46 pm
by Green Habit
Coach wrote:Green Habit wrote:numbers wrote:Glad the Sox are going back to the previous road unis. The ones they were using the last few years were such a drag.
I agree. The recent ones were a nice throwback for a little while but the change gives me fond childhood memories.
It's a nice change. Here's link for anyone interested:
http://espn.go.com/blog/boston/red-sox/ ... ad-jerseys
Funny that they used Ellsbury for the old picture.
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Mon February 10, 2014 6:06 pm
by Norah
Coach wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:numbers wrote:He's also a shill for the front office.
so much this
Still a worthy follow. Some journalists "get" Twitter, some really don't get it. Pete gets it.
Agreed
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Mon February 10, 2014 9:35 pm
by numbers
Green Habit wrote:numbers wrote:Glad the Sox are going back to the previous road unis. The ones they were using the last few years were such a drag.
I agree. The recent ones were a nice throwback for a little while but the change gives me fond childhood memories.
They looked too much like the Yankees, there was no red in them.
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Sat February 15, 2014 9:41 pm
by Coach
Bah
http://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/2014/ ... story.html
Jake Peavy sustains injury to pitching hand
FORT MYERS, Fla. — Jake Peavy’s first spring training with the Red Sox got off to a rocky start on Friday when he left JetBlue Park with his right hand heavily bandaged.
Manager John Farrell said Peavy was accidentally struck by a ball during the team’s informal workout.
“Nothing serious as far as I know,” Farrell said.
Still, Peavy emerged from the clubhouse with his palm and right ring finger wrapped in white tape and his index finger encased in a foam ring separating it from his other fingers.
“It’s nothing. I’m fine,” the righthander said. “Fell off the duck boat.”
On Saturday, he did not have his hand bandaged, and said he might take it easy for a few days but the injury was not serious.
Peavy also said a lot of Red Sox players are “holding out hope” that Stephen Drew will return to the team.
Peavy was 4-1 with a 4.04 earned run average in 10 starts for the Red Sox after being acquired from the Chicago White Sox in a three-team deal completed July 30.
Peavy started three games in the postseason and later purchased the duck boat he rode in the team’s World Series victory parade. It was transported to his home in Alabama to be used on a lake.
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Sat February 15, 2014 9:51 pm
by Norah
peavy sucks anyway
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Sun February 16, 2014 4:05 pm
by numbers
I guess dempster has decided to take it to the house.
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Sun February 16, 2014 5:17 pm
by Green Habit
I guess all those articles I was reading about the Sox having too deep of a rotation will go away now.
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Sun February 16, 2014 7:10 pm
by numbers
As little as I thought Dempster would contribute to this team, I am sad to see him go. Seems like a really cool guy.
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Sun February 16, 2014 7:23 pm
by Norah
Green Habit wrote:I guess all those articles I was reading about the Sox having too deep of a rotation will go away now.
The last time we had "too deep a rotation" we traded Bronson Arroyo for Willy Mo Pena and then the rest of our staff fell apart.
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Sun February 16, 2014 7:24 pm
by @SkitchP
shoulda used less Pena, amirite?
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Sun February 16, 2014 7:24 pm
by numbers
Plus is Arroyo is better right now, at his age, than maybe all but 2 of the guys they had in the rotation that year.
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Mon February 17, 2014 1:10 am
by Coach
This is nice. I didn't expect anything out of Dempster.
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Mon February 17, 2014 3:09 pm
by MattA75
When I heard this, my first thought was that maybe Dempster had talked to them in the middle of last season, and that's why they were so willing to take on Peavy even though he had another year on his deal
Also, Arroyo has benefitted greatly from pitching in that craptastic division for the last decade or so...I'm not saying they should not have traded him, just that his stats are probably not a realistic indication of what they would have been in Boston
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Mon February 17, 2014 3:19 pm
by Norah
Arroyo's stats are legit. Since the trade he has been one of the most consistent players in MLB. Since going to Cincy he pitched less than 200 innings in a season once, and that was in 2011 when he onky pitched 199. Dude's a fucking workhorse, and that's exactly the type of pitcher you want. No one is saying he's a GREAT pitcher, but he's a very consistent, dependable pretty good pitcher.
Remember all those years of trying shit like Aaron Cook and John Smoltz?
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Mon February 17, 2014 5:38 pm
by numbers
He's basically been Derek Lowe without ever getting paid like Lowe did.
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Mon February 17, 2014 6:09 pm
by Coach
Wily Mo Pena. Didn't he have trouble with the curve?

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Mon February 17, 2014 9:39 pm
by MattA75
cutuphalfdead wrote:Arroyo's stats are legit. Since the trade he has been one of the most consistent players in MLB. Since going to Cincy he pitched less than 200 innings in a season once, and that was in 2011 when he onky pitched 199. Dude's a fucking workhorse, and that's exactly the type of pitcher you want. No one is saying he's a GREAT pitcher, but he's a very consistent, dependable pretty good pitcher.
Remember all those years of trying shit like Aaron Cook and John Smoltz?
he absolutely takes the ball every fifth day and that is commendable, and the Red Sox never should have traded him when they did...I'm simply saying some of his stats are helped by pitching in the NL Central, and as such, he becomes a bit more overvalued than he should be
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Mon February 17, 2014 9:42 pm
by MattA75
Also, I really hope they don't take the money saved with Dempster and decide to give Stephen Drew some outrageous 1 year deal