The Supreme Court

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52022
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

McParadigm wrote:
PHATJ wrote:Watching all the lefties melt down is the funniest thing ever.
An entire political philosophy, summarized
Lol
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
PHATJ wrote:Watching all the lefties melt down is the funniest thing ever.
An entire political philosophy, summarized
Lol
It’s funny tho.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85142
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by epilogue »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
PHATJ wrote:Watching all the lefties melt down is the funniest thing ever.
An entire political philosophy, summarized
Lol
AL
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85142
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by epilogue »

96583UP wrote:ah, yes

well, maybe he will go to jail too when this is all over
If he goes to jail, I'll throw a party in Vegas and all of you are invited!
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16296
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Birds in Hell »

McParadigm wrote:
PHATJ wrote:Watching all the lefties melt down is the funniest thing ever.
An entire political philosophy, summarized
I share your horror on this, McP.

It's such an infuriating, harmful and plain dumb attitude.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37452
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Norah »

durdencommatyler wrote:
96583UP wrote:ah, yes

well, maybe he will go to jail too when this is all over
If he goes to jail, I'll throw a party in Vegas and all of you are invited!
ok matty
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Green Habit »

Damnit. This is a underrated type of diversity problem the Court has.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37452
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Norah »

Image
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85142
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by epilogue »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
96583UP wrote:ah, yes

well, maybe he will go to jail too when this is all over
If he goes to jail, I'll throw a party in Vegas and all of you are invited!
ok matty
You are officially uninvited.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37452
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Norah »

durdencommatyler wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
96583UP wrote:ah, yes

well, maybe he will go to jail too when this is all over
If he goes to jail, I'll throw a party in Vegas and all of you are invited!
ok matty
You are officially uninvited.
an unfortunate slight
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85142
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by epilogue »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
96583UP wrote:ah, yes

well, maybe he will go to jail too when this is all over
If he goes to jail, I'll throw a party in Vegas and all of you are invited!
ok matty
You are officially uninvited.
an unfortunate slight
ohmygodIloveyousomuchrightnowI'dletyoufuckmeevenifyouwerehere
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37452
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Norah »

durdencommatyler wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
96583UP wrote:ah, yes

well, maybe he will go to jail too when this is all over
If he goes to jail, I'll throw a party in Vegas and all of you are invited!
ok matty
You are officially uninvited.
an unfortunate slight
ohmygodIloveyousomuchrightnowI'dletyoufuckmeevenifyouwerehere
:)
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85142
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by epilogue »

It's just... I mean... you GET me. :heartbeat:
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 25045
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

Green Habit wrote:Damnit. This is a underrated type of diversity problem the Court has.
He wants someone elite like him.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 25045
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

Also, lulz at you hoping Trump might thoughtfully work to improve diversity on the court.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37452
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Norah »

The one question in the vetting process will be "in your legal opinion, can a sitting president be subpoenaed?"
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

cutuphalfdead wrote:The one question in the vetting process will be "in your legal opinion, can a sitting president be subpoenaed?"
At least one top contender doesn’t believe presidents should be required to be distracted by investigations at all
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37452
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Norah »

McParadigm wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:The one question in the vetting process will be "in your legal opinion, can a sitting president be subpoenaed?"
At least one top contender doesn’t believe presidents should be required to be distracted by investigations at all
Well, when the President does it it's not illegal.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21687
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Simple Torture »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:The one question in the vetting process will be "in your legal opinion, can a sitting president be subpoenaed?"
At least one top contender doesn’t believe presidents should be required to be distracted by investigations at all
Well, when the President does it it's not illegal.
Get him, Agnew!

Image
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

the nomination is in!
Spoiler: show
Image
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Post Reply