Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri June 29, 2018 2:52 pm
LolMcParadigm wrote:An entire political philosophy, summarizedPHATJ wrote:Watching all the lefties melt down is the funniest thing ever.
Page 34 of 199
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri June 29, 2018 3:46 pm
It’s funny tho.E.H. Ruddock wrote:LolMcParadigm wrote:An entire political philosophy, summarizedPHATJ wrote:Watching all the lefties melt down is the funniest thing ever.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri June 29, 2018 10:19 pm
ALE.H. Ruddock wrote:LolMcParadigm wrote:An entire political philosophy, summarizedPHATJ wrote:Watching all the lefties melt down is the funniest thing ever.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri June 29, 2018 10:24 pm
If he goes to jail, I'll throw a party in Vegas and all of you are invited!96583UP wrote:ah, yes
well, maybe he will go to jail too when this is all over
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri June 29, 2018 10:31 pm
I share your horror on this, McP.McParadigm wrote:An entire political philosophy, summarizedPHATJ wrote:Watching all the lefties melt down is the funniest thing ever.
It's such an infuriating, harmful and plain dumb attitude.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri June 29, 2018 11:01 pm
ok mattydurdencommatyler wrote:If he goes to jail, I'll throw a party in Vegas and all of you are invited!96583UP wrote:ah, yes
well, maybe he will go to jail too when this is all over
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri June 29, 2018 11:09 pm
Damnit. This is a underrated type of diversity problem the Court has.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri June 29, 2018 11:10 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri June 29, 2018 11:40 pm
You are officially uninvited.cutuphalfdead wrote:ok mattydurdencommatyler wrote:If he goes to jail, I'll throw a party in Vegas and all of you are invited!96583UP wrote:ah, yes
well, maybe he will go to jail too when this is all over
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri June 29, 2018 11:41 pm
an unfortunate slightdurdencommatyler wrote:You are officially uninvited.cutuphalfdead wrote:ok mattydurdencommatyler wrote:If he goes to jail, I'll throw a party in Vegas and all of you are invited!96583UP wrote:ah, yes
well, maybe he will go to jail too when this is all over
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri June 29, 2018 11:41 pm
ohmygodIloveyousomuchrightnowI'dletyoufuckmeevenifyouwereherecutuphalfdead wrote:an unfortunate slightdurdencommatyler wrote:You are officially uninvited.cutuphalfdead wrote:ok mattydurdencommatyler wrote:If he goes to jail, I'll throw a party in Vegas and all of you are invited!96583UP wrote:ah, yes
well, maybe he will go to jail too when this is all over
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri June 29, 2018 11:42 pm
durdencommatyler wrote:ohmygodIloveyousomuchrightnowI'dletyoufuckmeevenifyouwereherecutuphalfdead wrote:an unfortunate slightdurdencommatyler wrote:You are officially uninvited.cutuphalfdead wrote:ok mattydurdencommatyler wrote:If he goes to jail, I'll throw a party in Vegas and all of you are invited!96583UP wrote:ah, yes
well, maybe he will go to jail too when this is all over
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri June 29, 2018 11:43 pm
It's just... I mean... you GET me. 
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Sat June 30, 2018 2:13 pm
He wants someone elite like him.Green Habit wrote:Damnit. This is a underrated type of diversity problem the Court has.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Sat June 30, 2018 2:14 pm
Also, lulz at you hoping Trump might thoughtfully work to improve diversity on the court.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Sat June 30, 2018 2:15 pm
The one question in the vetting process will be "in your legal opinion, can a sitting president be subpoenaed?"
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Sat June 30, 2018 2:23 pm
At least one top contender doesn’t believe presidents should be required to be distracted by investigations at allcutuphalfdead wrote:The one question in the vetting process will be "in your legal opinion, can a sitting president be subpoenaed?"
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Sat June 30, 2018 2:31 pm
Well, when the President does it it's not illegal.McParadigm wrote:At least one top contender doesn’t believe presidents should be required to be distracted by investigations at allcutuphalfdead wrote:The one question in the vetting process will be "in your legal opinion, can a sitting president be subpoenaed?"
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Sat June 30, 2018 2:55 pm
Get him, Agnew!cutuphalfdead wrote:Well, when the President does it it's not illegal.McParadigm wrote:At least one top contender doesn’t believe presidents should be required to be distracted by investigations at allcutuphalfdead wrote:The one question in the vetting process will be "in your legal opinion, can a sitting president be subpoenaed?"
