Re: The Protest Thread
Posted: Fri June 19, 2020 7:18 pm
My post came before yours lolBurtReynolds wrote:I just told you loldurdencommatyler wrote:But what's the real argument, guys?
My post came before yours lolBurtReynolds wrote:I just told you loldurdencommatyler wrote:But what's the real argument, guys?
Dude... come on. The peak era for building these monuments was the height of Jim Crow, with a smaller surge during the civil rights era. This is pretty easy.BurtReynolds wrote:Why? What business is it of yours? Who cares if they're relics or not? Those are probably the least likely to have been built by racists.Bi_3 wrote:I don't have an issue with statues or monuments that do things like list confederate war dead at a battlefield and I don't see a reason to blow up Stone Mountain, but all those statues that were put up in the middle of the 20th century that so many people pretend are relics from Reconstruction... those can come down.*digster wrote:Is that argument even hidden? I thought people were pretty clear that they didn't think there should be public monuments to people who tried to break up the country so they could keep black people enslaved.
*via civil means, not the mob
Burt is insane and he's been in hiding and away from the board for 2-3 months. Cut him some slack.digster wrote:I'm not sure I understand what Burt is trying to argue here. He's decrying a hidden argument that's plainly not hidden.
If you're not from the south, you're an outsider in this context. Who is this "We"?Rob wrote:Outsiders? Hiding the argument? Aren't many of us Americans debating the argument right now? Is it controversial to say we shouldn't commemorate the confederacy with monuments & statues? Put that shit in a museum and take a pilgrimage if you want to honor them. Shouldn't be on display in public.BurtReynolds wrote:Is the joke that their aren't any? Because, yeah that's what I was getting at. Outsiders don't think there is an acceptable monument possible, so this is all just sophistry and hiding the real argument.
Why do you think that is?digster wrote:In all honesty, though; does this argument happen in other countries? I've often asked this without finding one. Are there monuments scattered around government buildings and public spaces for the IRA in Northern Ireland? There's no one-to-one comparisons, but does this debate even happen anywhere else?
It all comes back to antifa reallyBurtReynolds wrote:Why do you think that is?digster wrote:In all honesty, though; does this argument happen in other countries? I've often asked this without finding one. Are there monuments scattered around government buildings and public spaces for the IRA in Northern Ireland? There's no one-to-one comparisons, but does this debate even happen anywhere else?
I don't know, but in this case, even the most famous confederate general was against this.digster wrote:In all honesty, though; does this argument happen in other countries? I've often asked this without finding one. Are there monuments scattered around government buildings and public spaces for the IRA in Northern Ireland? There's no one-to-one comparisons, but does this debate even happen anywhere else?
Old letters from Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee reveal the commander of the confederate army during the American Civil War opposed symbols, such as the monuments to Confederate figures that protesters are calling to be removed — and in some cases, removing themselves.
Lee fought to preserve the institution of slavery, but one letter written after the Civil War in 1866, addressed to Gen. Thomas L. Rosser shows Lee opposed the erection of Confederate monuments, symbols he said would keep division alive.
Lee’s letters said that while he would be grateful for such a gesture, these symbols would slow the country instead of “accelerating its accomplishment; & of continuing, if not adding to, the difficulties under which the Southern people labour.”
Years later, when invited to a Gettysburg memorial, Lee declined.
He said it was wiser “not to keep open the sores of war but to follow the examples of those nations who endeavored to obliterate the marks of civil strife.”
To answer my own question:BurtReynolds wrote:Why do you think that is?digster wrote:In all honesty, though; does this argument happen in other countries? I've often asked this without finding one. Are there monuments scattered around government buildings and public spaces for the IRA in Northern Ireland? There's no one-to-one comparisons, but does this debate even happen anywhere else?
That is the state's Attorney General and his son is leading the call to disband the city police department from the city council. So no, I'm not suggesting that, but I doubt the state will want to risk an acquittal and further protests.Strat wrote:are you actually suggesting here that the cops wont be getting a fair trial?? lolBi_3 wrote:But are the cops in Minnesota hoping for a fair trial safe?Strat wrote:You're safe, burt. I promise you.BurtReynolds wrote:Oh me easily. Trump still thinks he can score points off them.Strat wrote:i wonder who hates antifa more? burt or trump?
I assume you're just trolling here.BurtReynolds wrote: The memorials went up as a lure to get the south to willingly assimilate.
Looks to me like they're coming down when large groups of protesters decide they've had enough.This strategy worked. Once this was no longer necessary, ie. after any lingering southern identity or culture outside of what is allowed by the U.S.government is weakened enough, they come down.
See above.None of you understand power. It's like my teachings have fallen on deaf ears.
But they also....shouldn't be acquitted, so it seems weird to introduce this reading that their conviction is a politically-motivated fait accompli rather than the logical extension of what happens when you kneel on someone's neck for nine minutes until they die.Bi_3 wrote:That is the state's Attorney General and his son is leading the call to disband the city police department from the city council. So no, I'm not suggesting that, but I doubt the state will want to risk an acquittal and further protests.Strat wrote:are you actually suggesting here that the cops wont be getting a fair trial?? lolBi_3 wrote:But are the cops in Minnesota hoping for a fair trial safe?Strat wrote:You're safe, burt. I promise you.BurtReynolds wrote:Oh me easily. Trump still thinks he can score points off them.Strat wrote:i wonder who hates antifa more? burt or trump?
I assure you I'm not trolling. Once the conditioning fully takes hold, the people will do it themselves.Rob wrote:I assume you're just trolling here.BurtReynolds wrote: The memorials went up as a lure to get the south to willingly assimilate.
Looks to me like they're coming down when large groups of protesters decide they've had enough.This strategy worked. Once this was no longer necessary, ie. after any lingering southern identity or culture outside of what is allowed by the U.S.government is weakened enough, they come down.
See above.None of you understand power. It's like my teachings have fallen on deaf ears.