You never needed any redeeming in my eyes, big guy. Some good came out of this thread in the end, like me listening to those Beatles Anthology albums.stip wrote:I wonder how close I am in this thread to redeeming myself in KD's eyes.
So who here doesn't really like the Beatles
- Kevin Davis
- tl;dr
- Posts: 9312
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm
Re: So who here doesn't really like the Beatles
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: So who here doesn't really like the Beatles
And I illegally downloaded them!Kevin Davis wrote:You never needed any redeeming in my eyes, big guy. Some good came out of this thread in the end, like me listening to those Beatles Anthology albums.stip wrote:I wonder how close I am in this thread to redeeming myself in KD's eyes.
- bada
- Looks Like a Cat
- Posts: 12504
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm
Re: So who here doesn't really like the Beatles
stip wrote:Don't think of it as causal. Think of it as influencing. Extra weight on a scale.digster wrote:I'm still not even sure that applies. I understand what stip's saying about context influencing how people approach the Beatles, and could see context determining whether you give a band a shot...I don't see it turning The Beatles into someone's favorite band, or even a favored one.
If someone finds the Beatles package or mystique interesting(the look, how they talked, what they said, how they lived, how funny they were) that's a cool bonus. If that stuff is what puts the Beatles over the top for them it's seems perfectly reasonable. If someone feels Ringo isn't a particularly good singer but I finds him so lovable that they enjoy the songs he sings anyways that's valid to me. The knowledge of Ringo as a personality informs the experience. I suppose removing all context makes for a superior listening experience when it comes to judging music but also probably a much less enjoyable one. The mythology is a key component to not just the Beatles but all music. Would the British musicians from the 60s have been as interested in Robert Johnson if he didn't come along with the story that he sold his soul to the devil? The extra weight and influence is part of the fun.
- fishbob
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 402
- Joined: Sat March 09, 2013 9:32 am
- Location: Down Under
Re: So who here doesn't really like the Beatles
Beatles melodies are second to none
- Heathen
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3988
- Joined: Wed January 30, 2013 4:30 pm
Re: So who here doesn't really like the Beatles
Were there even melodies before the Beatles invented them?
cutuphalfdead wrote:so glad i don't see signatures
- Lament
- Commissioner
- Posts: 11792
- Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am
Re: So who here doesn't really like the Beatles
What did people eat before the Beatles invented food?
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: So who here doesn't really like the Beatles
I wonder how the spelling evolved from the original "Beatle" to the now-common (and much more widely used) "beetle".
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: So who here doesn't really like the Beatles
For a very short while they were considering billing themselves as the Beatals (as in "beat all"). They liked The Crickets and beat music, so...
(patriotic choking noises)
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: So who here doesn't really like the Beatles
Until the lightning strike sets you freeharmless wrote:but just as much of it is very "meh" and relies on the Beatles' already-established sound. To an extent it's arguable that, at some point, people began to buy The Beatles stuff because it sounded like The Beatles.
(patriotic choking noises)
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: So who here doesn't really like the Beatles
did the beatles talk much about the music they didn't like, very much. Artists rarely do that. it's too bad, It would be revealing.
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- Heathen
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3988
- Joined: Wed January 30, 2013 4:30 pm
Re: So who here doesn't really like the Beatles
I bet they didn't like Pearl Jam
cutuphalfdead wrote:so glad i don't see signatures
- Fuzzcharger
- Jeff's Infallible Pendulum
- Posts: 1919
- Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 2:06 am
- Location: Australia
Re: So who here doesn't really like the Beatles
Paul McCartney took drugs once.
Lament wrote: Like I always say, "Anyone who thinks getting kicked in the nuts by one person sucks has never gotten kicked in the nuts by two people at the same time."
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: So who here doesn't really like the Beatles
Well, quite. The point applies to every band in the world. The fact that fans of The Beatles buy Beatles records is not really anything surprising.McParadigm wrote:Until the lightning strike sets you freeharmless wrote:but just as much of it is very "meh" and relies on the Beatles' already-established sound. To an extent it's arguable that, at some point, people began to buy The Beatles stuff because it sounded like The Beatles.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- Fuzzcharger
- Jeff's Infallible Pendulum
- Posts: 1919
- Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 2:06 am
- Location: Australia
Re: So who here doesn't really like the Beatles
That reminds me of the time I took a Beatles tour in Liverpool. The guide on the Magical Mystery bus went to school with Paul. Apparently Ringo only got the gig because the bloke who they originally wanted to play drums thought they were rubbish and told them to piss off or something suitably rude to Paul. They never mentioned that guys name in an interview ever but this guide remembers when it all happened.
Lament wrote: Like I always say, "Anyone who thinks getting kicked in the nuts by one person sucks has never gotten kicked in the nuts by two people at the same time."
- Heathen
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3988
- Joined: Wed January 30, 2013 4:30 pm
Re: So who here doesn't really like the Beatles
Drummers don't know shit about music anyway, all they care about is beats.Fuzzcharger wrote:That reminds me of the time I took a Beatles tour in Liverpool. The guide on the Magical Mystery bus went to school with Paul. Apparently Ringo only got the gig because the bloke who they originally wanted to play drums thought they were rubbish and told them to piss off or something suitably rude to Paul. They never mentioned that guys name in an interview ever but this guide remembers when it all happened.
cutuphalfdead wrote:so glad i don't see signatures
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: So who here doesn't really like the Beatles
They had a drummer, who was with them right up until they got signed. It was suggested to them that he was a weak link, so they burned him right before signing. All you need is love...Fuzzcharger wrote:That reminds me of the time I took a Beatles tour in Liverpool. The guide on the Magical Mystery bus went to school with Paul. Apparently Ringo only got the gig because the bloke who they originally wanted to play drums thought they were rubbish and told them to piss off or something suitably rude to Paul. They never mentioned that guys name in an interview ever but this guide remembers when it all happened.
They stole Ringo because he was the drummer for one of their more popular rivals, and was popular on the Liverpool scene all by himself.
(patriotic choking noises)
- Clint72
- A Return To Form
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 11:41 am
- Location: Australia
Re: So who here doesn't really like the Beatles
Spot on, watched Anthology much? I watched the Directors cut twice, BC (before children)McParadigm wrote:They had a drummer, who was with them right up until they got signed. It was suggested to them that he was a weak link, so they burned him right before signing. All you need is love...Fuzzcharger wrote:That reminds me of the time I took a Beatles tour in Liverpool. The guide on the Magical Mystery bus went to school with Paul. Apparently Ringo only got the gig because the bloke who they originally wanted to play drums thought they were rubbish and told them to piss off or something suitably rude to Paul. They never mentioned that guys name in an interview ever but this guide remembers when it all happened.
They stole Ringo because he was the drummer for one of their more popular rivals, and was popular on the Liverpool scene all by himself.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: So who here doesn't really like the Beatles
I've watched it a few times. It's got some amazing footage, even if the Neil Aspinall protective sheen is all over the interview stuff.
Mostly, I've got a real thing for well-researched bios. Right now I'm reading this set:


1,300 pages on Elvis.
Mostly, I've got a real thing for well-researched bios. Right now I'm reading this set:


1,300 pages on Elvis.
(patriotic choking noises)
- Clint72
- A Return To Form
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 11:41 am
- Location: Australia
Re: So who here doesn't really like the Beatles
I am sure it will be interesting, i have read a few music autobiography, Clapton was real good and of course Scar Tissue
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: So who here doesn't really like the Beatles
Have you read Peter Ames Carlin's Bruce?
(patriotic choking noises)