Red Mosquito

Strat wrote:lol Bernie

Bernie Sanders
·
Billionaires should not exist.

NEW YORK — Joe Walsh and Bill Weld, two of the three Republicans challenging President Donald Trump for their party's 2020 presidential nomination, are set to meet in a debate on Tuesday, hoping to bring attention to their long-shot candidacies.

Trump will not take part in the event in New York hosted by the website Business Insider, nor will the third candidate seeking the Republican nomination, former South Carolina governor and congressman Mark Sanford.

The debate featuring Walsh, a radio talk-show host and former U.S. congressman from Illinois, and Weld, a former Massachusetts governor, is not sanctioned by the Republican Party, which has thrown its full support behind Trump. Sanford cited a scheduling conflict for missing the event.

Walsh, Weld and Sanford, in a joint article published in the Washington Post this month, called Trump "a serial self-promoter" who is steering the party away from "personal responsibility, fiscal sanity and rule of law."

Trump is expected to coast to victory in his quest for the Republican nomination before facing the Democratic Party's nominee in the November 2020 election. A Sept. 16-20 Reuters/Ipsos poll showed that 82% of registered Republicans approved of Trump's job performance.

BurtReynolds wrote:Harris really fizzled out, didn't she?

Rob wrote:I'm sad that Bernie looks like he may be done. But Warren's rise tells me it was more about the presentation than the substance, so not too sad.

tragabigzanda wrote:

Rob wrote:I'm sad that Bernie looks like he may be done. But Warren's rise tells me it was more about the presentation than the substance, so not too sad.

I'd substitute "details" for "presentation."

tragabigzanda wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:Harris really fizzled out, didn't she?

Good. She’s don’t a horrible job of giving any clear indication of what it is she stands for, beyond not taking crap from an old white man.

tragabigzanda wrote:

Rob wrote:I'm sad that Bernie looks like he may be done. But Warren's rise tells me it was more about the presentation than the substance, so not too sad.

I'd substitute "details" for "presentation."

Rob wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:

Rob wrote:I'm sad that Bernie looks like he may be done. But Warren's rise tells me it was more about the presentation than the substance, so not too sad.

I'd substitute "details" for "presentation."

She's into details and specific plans. Bernie is more about the grand/moral argument. That's what I meant about presentation. I think you need both, and she just has a better balance. Substance is what matters more, and so I'm fine with either.