Red Mosquito

tragabigzanda wrote:

McParadigm wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:

McParadigm wrote:

Bammer wrote:

B wrote:It's still going to be a long time before the Republicans let a woman run their party.

I won’t argue this. But just imagine it’s Haley.

Who is on the other side of that ballot?

If you’re suggesting that she would beat Joe Biden under conditions where she had full Republican support, I think that’s almost a foregone conclusion.

Not choosing that route is one of many ways the Republican Party is needlessly self-immolating…and an example of how the party’s external grief-targeting and absolute rejection of self-reflection is destructive to its cause. If everything is always someone else’s fault, then you learn no lessons.

Can’t decide between “same could be said about the Dems” and “bring back Dave a”

I mean, the same could be said about centrists, too. To some degree that’s a very human reaction to things. Everyone experiences some amount of that impulse. But neither the centrists nor the Democrats have let it talk them into rejecting a presidential candidate who would be a near-guaranteed win for one who tells them what they want to hear.

They rejected Bloomberg for some reason

Michael Bloomberg was a billionaire who tried to use his vast personal resources to secure a presidential bid. When his polling numbers didn’t qualify him for the early debates, the Democratic National Committee actively lobbied for him. When that led to him appearing onstage, it went so poorly that the otherwise-sympathetic New York Times ran a headline called How Bloomberg Bungled a Debate. A Monmouth poll from shortly before primary voting started found his like-ability ratings with registered voters to be middling at best. The same week, a Quinnipiac poll showed him performing worse against Trump than 3 of the other Democrat candidates in a head-to-head. Joe Biden was the far and away winner of that poll.

I would need you to explain to me how this is an example of what we are talking about.

B wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

B wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:He hits it on the nose.

Trump voters think Trump is listening to them, but it's Dems that are delusional.

You see an opportunity to shame and other, I see a chance to unite so the big stuff can get done.

By shaming different people than I did?

Fair, my response was unnecessarily harsh.

Bloomberg mayorial era may have been peak NYC

we will wait a very long time another like him that can run that behemoth successfully

If he went back to peak Biden for the election it would be the biggest sweep in history, and likely the end of MAGA as a major force in politics :

i am so glad we are never allowed to change our minds over time

Model, role model, roll some models in blood

Peeps wrote:i am so glad we are never allowed to change our minds over time

The term you’re searching for in this case is “dementia”

Bammer wrote:

Peeps wrote:i am so glad we are never allowed to change our minds over time

The term you’re searching for in this case is “dementia”

Its funny how now that Fetterman is largely recovered he’s suddenly moderate. Must be something about brain damage and leftism



But on topic, changing your mind on something does not mean you’ve come to a better conclusion. They idea that unfettered immigration is good is long dead outside progglism and businesses looking for easily exploited labor

Bi_3 wrote:I bet if you explained it to them without the threat of shaming them as some kind of *ist…

Bi_3 wrote:You see an opportunity to shame an other, I see a chance to unite so the big stuff can get done.

Bi_3 wrote:Must be something about brain damage and leftism

Quite the three day journey you had there

McParadigm wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:I bet if you explained it to them without the threat of shaming them as some kind of *ist…

Bi_3 wrote:You see an opportunity to shame an other, I see a chance to unite so the big stuff can get done.

Bi_3 wrote:Must be something about brain damage and leftism

Quite the three day journey you had there

Keep going. There literally thousands of unrelated posts you can group.

Bi_3 wrote:

McParadigm wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:I bet if you explained it to them without the threat of shaming them as some kind of *ist…

Bi_3 wrote:You see an opportunity to shame an other, I see a chance to unite so the big stuff can get done.

Bi_3 wrote:Must be something about brain damage and leftism

Quite the three day journey you had there

Keep going. There literally thousands of unrelated posts you can group.

You see an opportunity to shame an other. I see a chance to recognize how scorn and cruelty imbalance a message of tolerance.

Bi_3 wrote:If he went back to peak Biden for the election it would be the biggest sweep in history, and likely the end of MAGA as a major force in politics :

He’s CEO now. Gotta control that spending with half measures.

Bammer wrote:

Peeps wrote:i am so glad we are never allowed to change our minds over time

The term you’re searching for in this case is “dementia”

so is that your claim about the transgendered basketball player, you forgot you made such a claim?

McParadigm wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

McParadigm wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:I bet if you explained it to them without the threat of shaming them as some kind of *ist…

Bi_3 wrote:You see an opportunity to shame an other, I see a chance to unite so the big stuff can get done.

Bi_3 wrote:Must be something about brain damage and leftism

Quite the three day journey you had there

Keep going. There literally thousands of unrelated posts you can group.

You see an opportunity to shame an other. I see a chance to recognize how scorn and cruelty imbalance a message of tolerance.

Pasting together out of context quotes to create a false impression of hypocrisy in not the own you might think McP.

Inside us all live two wolves: one with a respectability kink obsessed with being the "adult in the room" and the other a petty little hater who revels in taking cheap shots

Jorge wrote:Inside us all live two wolves: one with a respectability kink obsessed with being the "adult in the room" and the other a petty little hater who revels in taking cheap shots

Just your classic “one with a monocle and one with his hat on backwards” scenario

spike wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:If he went back to peak Biden for the election it would be the biggest sweep in history, and likely the end of MAGA as a major force in politics :

He’s CEO now. Gotta control that spending with half measures.

ANYWAY....

The Texas thing is turning into quite the event, itll be interesting to see how Biden responds to states openly rejecting federal direction:

States backing texas:

Bi_3 wrote:If he went back to peak Biden for the election it would be the biggest sweep in history, and likely the end of MAGA as a major force in politics :

there's no way that he remembers saying that

Chris_H_2 wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:If he went back to peak Biden for the election it would be the biggest sweep in history, and likely the end of MAGA as a major force in politics :

there's no way that he remembers saying that

Peeps, your retort? Please try to keep little girls out of it by the way, perv.