Re: Anybody want a Corona?
Posted: Thu July 16, 2020 4:31 pm


And the long term organ damage?verb_to_trust wrote:I mean, a lot of times they arentspike wrote:Let’s only concern ourselves with survival rate, because the symptoms are no big deal.macphisto wrote:I think people just want to feel human and regain some sense of normalcy in the face of a deadly virus with a 99.9% survival rate.verb_to_trust wrote:Still don't understand why people would voluntarily eat at a restaurant or go to a bar right now.

I think you just invented vaccines.verb_to_trust wrote:How about instead of a vaccine we just jab everyone with the virus?
Like HIV?macphisto wrote:
So that's automatic then?JuanHamm wrote:And the long term organ damage?verb_to_trust wrote:I mean, a lot of times they arentspike wrote:Let’s only concern ourselves with survival rate, because the symptoms are no big deal.macphisto wrote:I think people just want to feel human and regain some sense of normalcy in the face of a deadly virus with a 99.9% survival rate.verb_to_trust wrote:Still don't understand why people would voluntarily eat at a restaurant or go to a bar right now.
COVID is only transmitted by fucking or blood? Great news!Stardog Champion wrote:Like HIV?macphisto wrote:
Did I wear a condom in the 90s for nothing?
Imagine, if you will, a disease that can spread to others for days before you start to become symptomatic.macphisto wrote:
that's still like 350,000 deaths in the US, which is almost as many people as are killed by police each year.macphisto wrote:I think people just want to feel human and regain some sense of normalcy in the face of a deadly virus with a 99.9% survival rate.verb_to_trust wrote:Still don't understand why people would voluntarily eat at a restaurant or go to a bar right now.
I'd rather not find out. There's also the blood clots.verb_to_trust wrote:So that's automatic then?JuanHamm wrote:And the long term organ damage?verb_to_trust wrote:I mean, a lot of times they arentspike wrote:Let’s only concern ourselves with survival rate, because the symptoms are no big deal.macphisto wrote:I think people just want to feel human and regain some sense of normalcy in the face of a deadly virus with a 99.9% survival rate.verb_to_trust wrote:Still don't understand why people would voluntarily eat at a restaurant or go to a bar right now.
Sorry, I'm having a hard time imagining that.B wrote:Imagine, if you will, a disease that can spread to others for days before you start to become symptomatic.macphisto wrote:
Coronavirus spread by asymptomatic people 'appears to be rare,' WHO official says
The spread of Covid-19 by someone who is not showing symptoms appears to be rare, Maria Van Kerkhove, the World Health Organization's technical lead for coronavirus response and head of the emerging diseases and zoonoses unit, said during a media briefing in Geneva on Monday.
"From the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual," Van Kerkhove said on Monday.
"We have a number of reports from countries who are doing very detailed contact tracing. They're following asymptomatic cases, they're following contacts and they're not finding secondary transmission onward. It is very rare -- and much of that is not published in the literature," she said. "We are constantly looking at this data and we're trying to get more information from countries to truly answer this question. It still appears to be rare that an asymptomatic individual actually transmits onward."
https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/08/health/c ... index.html
I think you meant:verb_to_trust wrote:DEFUND COVID
That's asymptomatic, not pre-symptomatic.macphisto wrote:Sorry, I'm having a hard time imagining that.B wrote:Imagine, if you will, a disease that can spread to others for days before you start to become symptomatic.macphisto wrote:
Coronavirus spread by asymptomatic people 'appears to be rare,' WHO official says
The spread of Covid-19 by someone who is not showing symptoms appears to be rare, Maria Van Kerkhove, the World Health Organization's technical lead for coronavirus response and head of the emerging diseases and zoonoses unit, said during a media briefing in Geneva on Monday.
"From the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual," Van Kerkhove said on Monday.
"We have a number of reports from countries who are doing very detailed contact tracing. They're following asymptomatic cases, they're following contacts and they're not finding secondary transmission onward. It is very rare -- and much of that is not published in the literature," she said. "We are constantly looking at this data and we're trying to get more information from countries to truly answer this question. It still appears to be rare that an asymptomatic individual actually transmits onward."
https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/08/health/c ... index.html
This changes everything. I'm never leaving my house again.JuanHamm wrote:Asymptomatic and presymptomatic are two different things. Presymptomatic people are contagious last I checked.
Society thanks you. Now if we can just get you to stop going online too.macphisto wrote:This changes everything. I'm never leaving my house again.JuanHamm wrote:Asymptomatic and presymptomatic are two different things. Presymptomatic people are contagious last I checked.
We may have saved a life here today, Juan.macphisto wrote:This changes everything. I'm never leaving my house again.JuanHamm wrote:Asymptomatic and presymptomatic are two different things. Presymptomatic people are contagious last I checked.
That's pretty rude.JuanHamm wrote:Society thanks you. Now if we can just get you to stop going online too.macphisto wrote:This changes everything. I'm never leaving my house again.JuanHamm wrote:Asymptomatic and presymptomatic are two different things. Presymptomatic people are contagious last I checked.