Page 349 of 472
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Tue October 18, 2016 10:48 pm
by Simple Torture
theplatypus wrote:Simple Torture wrote:I had this thought in the shower this morning, so please bear with me (and hold your vomit until the end): a lot of speculation is flying around about what Trump might do after the election if he loses. There's talk of a "Trump News Network" that he and Roger Ailes could start; he could start an alt-right super PAC; he could just go on speaking tours and rake in the cash; or he might just spend a few months contesting the election results and then disappear into thin air. But not many people have been pondering: could Trump run for President again in 2020? It's not a very difficult scenario to imagine: if Clinton gets elected and (a) the economy either flat lines, slightly recedes, or goes into a deep recession; (b) there's a terrorist attack (or a series of them) carried out by a Syrian refugee; (c) Hillary's choice(s) to fill the Supreme Court start to be the deciding votes in cases that might drive his base mad, and then another justice dies or retires in 2019; or (d) there actually are voting irregularities, even if they're not enough to swing the election one way or another...couldn't you see Trump running on a platform of "I told you so!" in 2020? He's obviously got a floor or 35%-39% of the electorate, so it's not like it'd be inconceivable for him to get through the primary process again--and the likes of Ryan, Rubio, Cruz, and Pence won't have a leg to stand on when it comes to arguing against his campaign, since they've all supported it.
There's certainly modern precedent for something like this when you look at Nixon. I think it's highly unlikely, but certainly possible. Go ahead and vomit now.
How disappointed were you when your Star Wars Trump quotes were ignored a few pages back?
I stand by my work no matter the response; only disappointed that it cut into my time for watching Once Upon A Time In Shanghai.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Tue October 18, 2016 10:48 pm
by Dscans
Simple Torture wrote:I had this thought in the shower this morning, so please bear with me (and hold your vomit until the end): a lot of speculation is flying around about what Trump might do after the election if he loses. There's talk of a "Trump News Network" that he and Roger Ailes could start; he could start an alt-right super PAC; he could just go on speaking tours and rake in the cash; or he might just spend a few months contesting the election results and then disappear into thin air. But not many people have been pondering: could Trump run for President again in 2020? It's not a very difficult scenario to imagine: if Clinton gets elected and (a) the economy either flat lines, slightly recedes, or goes into a deep recession; (b) there's a terrorist attack (or a series of them) carried out by a Syrian refugee; (c) Hillary's choice(s) to fill the Supreme Court start to be the deciding votes in cases that might drive his base mad, and then another justice dies or retires in 2019; or (d) there actually are voting irregularities, even if they're not enough to swing the election one way or another...couldn't you see Trump running on a platform of "I told you so!" in 2020? He's obviously got a floor or 35%-39% of the electorate, so it's not like it'd be inconceivable for him to get through the primary process again--and the likes of Ryan, Rubio, Cruz, and Pence won't have a leg to stand on when it comes to arguing against his campaign, since they've all supported it.
There's certainly modern precedent for something like this when you look at Nixon. I think it's highly unlikely, but certainly possible. Go ahead and vomit now.
Are we vomiting at the Trump 2020 scenario or at picturing you in the shower?
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Tue October 18, 2016 10:49 pm
by Self
Go high, Simple Torture. Go high.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Tue October 18, 2016 11:12 pm
by Strat
McParadigm wrote:Self wrote:Isn't that the same guy who released those Planned Parenthood videos? Looks like he still has the same editors.
And the "illegal immigrant" voter who turned out to be an American citizen (Gorkowski? Something like that).
And the video a few days/weeks ago where he was prevented from conmitting voter fraud but claimed it a victory anyway because, had he been willing to leave a paper trail that even the most inconsequential of reviews (the type that run all the time) would have revealed and implicated him in, he could have temporarily voted using another living citizen's name.
But if you're moronic trash on the internet his works are always very, very important
Oh wonderful, my conservative rube friends are now starting to post the video
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Tue October 18, 2016 11:26 pm
by 96583UP
BurtReynolds wrote:What are the candidates' stances on letting Dave A into the Hall of Fame?
Hillary: Are the citizens of Ohio predominantly Dave A. people or Dave K. people?
Trump: <sniff> I uh... <sniff> ... WRONG ... <SNIFF> <grope> ... Dave J. deserves to be in! <sniff> ... NO ... <sniff> The HOF is a rigged vote by crooked insiders! <SNIFF> ... <sniff> ... Only I can save Dave J. from this rigged system! <sniff> <grope> Matt Cameron plays too fast! <SNIFF> ... Loser!
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 12:20 am
by Jorge
Trump has invited Obama's Kenyan-born half-brother as a guest for tomorrow's debate. What.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 12:26 am
by BurtReynolds
theplatypus wrote:Trump has invited Obama's Kenyan-born half-brother as a guest for tomorrow's debate. What.
Afterwards he will be swiftly kicked out of the country.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 12:48 am
by McParadigm
Republicans think Democrats are so dumb that they'd go to great lengths to rig elections in only those cities that they'll never lose anyway.
Someone should tell them that Dems "rigging" the count in Chicago is like a kid using cheat codes after beating the game.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 12:51 am
by Simple Torture
Self wrote:Go high, Simple Torture. Go high.

Re: Election 2016
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 1:12 am
by The Argonaut
theplatypus wrote:Trump has invited Obama's Kenyan-born half-brother as a guest for tomorrow's debate. What.
This is hilarious to me. What does this accomplish?
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 1:19 am
by Jorge
It almost sounds like it's in direct response to Obama telling him to stop whining today.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 1:22 am
by McParadigm
The Argonaut wrote:theplatypus wrote:Trump has invited Obama's Kenyan-born half-brother as a guest for tomorrow's debate. What.
This is hilarious to me. What does this accomplish?
If this all turns out to be another Joaquin Phoenix documentary, I'm gonna be pissed.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 1:42 am
by dprival78
do you guys really think that it was all a matter editing in the recent vids? is it really above the political machine to orchestrate shit like that?
this o'keefe guy has a bit of a spotty past, but two of the guys in these videos have been fired in the last two days. and attacking him and avoiding the subject matter is like the DNC crying "the russians did it, the russians did it" anytime anyone brings up anything in the leaked emails. the messenger isn't the point here.
the corruption and collusion and elitism and overall shittyness isn't limited to one party.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 1:45 am
by Bi_3
Since we all agree on something (other than the whole LB > BS thing), this thread getting dull. Maybe I should try defending Trump.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 1:47 am
by dprival78
make this thread great again
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 4:01 am
by McParadigm
FWIW, "Rigged, for her pleasure" is a legitimately funny meme. So, B+, I guess....
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 5:12 am
by simple schoolboy
McParadigm wrote:Republicans think Democrats are so dumb that they'd go to great lengths to rig elections in only those cities that they'll never lose anyway.
Someone should tell them that Dems "rigging" the count in Chicago is like a kid using cheat codes after beating the game.
Does the city level count matter? Aren't electors determined at the state level popular vote?
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 1:44 pm
by McParadigm
simple schoolboy wrote:McParadigm wrote:Republicans think Democrats are so dumb that they'd go to great lengths to rig elections in only those cities that they'll never lose anyway.
Someone should tell them that Dems "rigging" the count in Chicago is like a kid using cheat codes after beating the game.
Does the city level count matter? Aren't electors determined at the state level popular vote?
Yes. And Illinois hasn't seen a republican candidate come close in a quarter century.
If, for example, Bush had wanted to use voter fraud to take it away from John Kerry, he would have had to "create" more than 500,000 fake votes. In one state. If McCain had wanted to do that against Obama (popular there for obvious reasons), he would have had to invent more than 1,300,000 fake votes.
There's just nothing to be gained by Democrats from rigging anything in Illinois.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 2:40 pm
by McParadigm
It shouldn't surprise me that a man who would make a Sandy Hook truther a top advisor would be that dumb tho
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Wed October 19, 2016 2:54 pm
by Simple Torture
I've enjoyed live-RMing the debates, going all the way back to the primaries, and I'm kind of sad that tonight will be the last one.
