Re: So who here doesn't really like the Beatles
Posted: Mon October 21, 2013 7:02 pm
He totally punched that girl in Forrest Gump, too.
Is it possible to rate a band more than that?Gods' Die wrote:The thing I love about the Beatles is the dichotomy that they're both the best band ever and overrated.
I'm kind of the opposite. When I first got to the point where music became the most important thing in the world to me, The Beatles were the first band I went "back" to get into, because all I ever heard about was that they were the greatest band ever. And at first I was really into them, and took the time to get to know the entire catalog. But then I started checking out other things from the past and expanding my tastes beyond the mainstream/alternative U2/Pearl Jam type stuff, and they fell off pretty fast and hard for me. The deeper I delved into the past, the less and less interest I had in them until it got to the point that I realized I didn't even care enough to call them a band I "liked." In the years since then, the gulf between their material I still enjoy and their material that I'm fairly indifferent to seems to just get bigger and bigger. As I've said a few times before, I would never deny their influence or popularity, and I suppose I can see why other people would think they're the best, but for me they're not even in the discussion. I guess they're a lot like Bob Dylan in that sense for me.Gods' Die wrote:Anecdotal evidence: I fucking hated the Beatles because of this when I was young (early to mid-high school) and the poppy love love love stuff. When I actually started listening, I gave them their due and realized that I think they're the best. And they're not my favorite, but I do really think they are the best.
I believe there was talk of wheels, spokes, houses, and guests.harmless wrote:Is it possible to rate a band more than that?Gods' Die wrote:The thing I love about the Beatles is the dichotomy that they're both the best band ever and overrated.
Well, no, I'm genuinely wondering how a band can be both overrated and the best band ever.Gods' Die wrote:I believe there was talk of wheels, spokes, houses, and guests.harmless wrote:Is it possible to rate a band more than that?Gods' Die wrote:The thing I love about the Beatles is the dichotomy that they're both the best band ever and overrated.
They're just a band, so when they're talked of as the end all be all, yeah, how can that not be an overrating? And to make the dichotomy interesting they're also the best ever.
But I assume you were just being an ass, and your question was rhetorical.
It wasn't Pete Best, so I gather it was Johnny Hutchinson. The way the guide told the story it was along the lines of this local Liverpool drummer knocking back a spot in the band. Anyways it was interesting. This old bloke seemed legit but it was 10 years ago so I may have forgotten some of the details.McParadigm wrote:Pete Best? Pete gets mentioned all the time.
I'm sure they were referring to Johnny Hutchinson, who was only actually grabbed as a stand-in for the "Silver Beetles" when the band fired one drummer, learned that they had to wait two days for the new guy to start, and had two gigs in the meantime. He was never actually asked or recruited for the band....he did play the stand-in gigs, but he was vocal about not liking the band at that time.
He came around to liking them, and later volunteered to stand in yet again when they had a few drummerless gigs before Ringo could join them.
Yeah...I'm the same way in this regard. There's a lot of songs on those records that I never revisit while skipping around them to hear the ones I adore. I guess that's not a gulf getting bigger as much as I just don't have the time for them anymore. And as music is easier and easier to attain I spend less time trying to get myself to like things I think I'm supposed to like, but with these guys there wasn't any of that homework feeling...it almost immediately became incredibly exciting to see what I could discover next. "How fucking good can these guys possibly be?" And they also fill the role of intellectually liking someone where it pays off the more you listen to them to go with the instant gratification.Lament wrote: In the years since then, the gulf between their material I still enjoy and their material that I'm fairly indifferent to seems to just get bigger and bigger.
Because at the end of the day they're another band with producers, studios, instruments, and singers. The level they're generally assumed to be on doesn't seem like something that's actually attainable to me. They were the best, but there's so many flaws and talented challengers with amazing catalogs. I guess what I'm saying is they're not Jesus, the gaps between them and the other top tier artists of all time is small.harmless wrote:Well, no, I'm genuinely wondering how a band can be both overrated and the best band ever.Gods' Die wrote:I believe there was talk of wheels, spokes, houses, and guests.harmless wrote:Is it possible to rate a band more than that?Gods' Die wrote:The thing I love about the Beatles is the dichotomy that they're both the best band ever and overrated.
They're just a band, so when they're talked of as the end all be all, yeah, how can that not be an overrating? And to make the dichotomy interesting they're also the best ever.
But I assume you were just being an ass, and your question was rhetorical.
I agree with this, I'm 40 years old and until about a year and a half ago I never owned a Beatles album. Growing up I couldn't help but hear the Beatles everywhere and I always thought yeah whatever. I randomly heard Tomorrow Never Know someplace and really liked it and so I bought Revolver, and then Rubber Soul, and then Abbey Road and just kept buying them. I can’t believe I lived almost 40 years without ever hearing the entire Abbey Road medley, or songs like Yer Blues, And Your Bird Can Sing, I’m Looking through You, I’ve Just Seen a Face, etc, etc.Gods' Die wrote:The thing I love about the Beatles is the dichotomy that they're both the best band ever and overrated. Of course they're overrated, having such superlatives attached to them. I think stip's off on his thinking here a bit. For a lot of people who listen more than passively to what's on the radio the Beatles have to overcome being overrated and revered without peer. This drives a lot of people away, so for a fraction of listeners the music really has to earn it.
This is exactly what I would have been saying a couple of years ago.kreng wrote:I realize I'm 36 pages late but don't really like them either. I can appreciate what they've done and meant for music, and I'm not offended or cringing whenever I hear them or anything. I like a few of their tunes but I would never purposely play any of their songs.
harmless wrote:I'm genuinely wondering how a band can be both overrated and the best band ever.
http://dangerousminds.net/comments/the_ ... as_garbage“Yellow Submarine” - “This is a load of rubbish, really. I take the mickey out of myself on the piano and play stuff like this. I think they know it’s not that good.”