Red Mosquito

Everything you just said is all still based in "we can't really know." This has become a circular argument. As soon as you started going down this avenue, Jorge brought up Russell's Teapot, which still applies to everything you're saying. This is basic stuff.

I passed a church with a sign that said "god has no grandchildren". What's that supposed to mean?

BurtReynolds wrote:I passed a church with a sign that said "god has no grandchildren". What's that supposed to mean?

God owns our children.

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:I passed a church with a sign that said "god has no grandchildren". What's that supposed to mean?

God owns our children.

Is that why he kills them so often?

Maybe it's some kinda da vinci code reference?

GOD NEEDS CHILDREN. SEND GOD YOUR CHILDREN.

If I were in charge of nasa, the first thing I would do is launch a tea pot into space.

Earl Grey or Chai?

You cannot prove what is inside the teapot.

LoathedVermin72 wrote:Everything you just said is all still based in "we can't really know." This has become a circular argument. The second you first started going down this avenue, Jorge brought up Russell's Teapot, which still applies to everything you're saying.

Russell's Teapot simply tries to illustrate that the fact that we can’t disprove something is a very poor reason to believe it. I don't believe in God because we can't disprove it. I believe in God because at this point in time, it's reasonable to, knowing that i could be wrong.

You can never really know. It might be coffee.

pnjguy wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:Everything you just said is all still based in "we can't really know." This has become a circular argument. The second you first started going down this avenue, Jorge brought up Russell's Teapot, which still applies to everything you're saying.

Russell's Teapot simply tries to illustrate that the fact that we can’t disprove something is a very poor reason to believe it. I don't believe in God because we can't disprove it. I believe in God because at this point in time, it's reasonable to, knowing that i could be wrong.

I'd question what you define as "reasonable," but whatever floats your boat.

Also, I wasn't bringing up Russell's Teapot in response to your belief, but in response to every argument you posted.

BurtReynolds wrote:You can never really know. It might be coffee.

It better not be fucking decaf. FUCK DECAF.

I came in here to see what was going on. Im too buzzed for this shit.

So much for the idea that godless scientists can't be objective. The biggest finding to support inflation theory quickly demolished by two groups of scientists.

Evidence for Cosmic Inflation Theory Bites the (Space) Dust

http://www.space.com/28423-cosmic-infla ... 0_39708137

turned2black wrote:So much for the idea that godless scientists can't be objective. The biggest finding to support inflation theory quickly demolished by two groups of scientists.

Evidence for Cosmic Inflation Theory Bites the (Space) Dust

http://www.space.com/28423-cosmic-infla ... 0_39708137

To be more specific: godless scientists can be objective when there is no clear public policy implication.

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressiv ... ill-alive/

BurtReynolds wrote:I passed a church with a sign that said "god has no grandchildren". What's that supposed to mean?

they are all his children

Guys, god still doesn't exist. Nothing has changed. It's 2015. There has never been a more ridiculous time to think otherwise.

Welcome to The God topic, Soma