Red Mosquito

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:i wanna be at this listening party

I'd rather be with an animal.

EJ wrote:

harmless wrote:I feel they need some electronica / euphoric trance / trouse influences in this album to truly be able to call it experimental.

Nah, they just need Boom hammering away on an ondes Martenot or glockenspiel.

Pearl Jam being experimental sounds like such an oxymoron to me. They're just so far from it. I don't even mean it as criticism.
For some reason i can picture them successfully write a couple of tunes with some sort of a tribal rhythm but i wouldn't call even that experimental.

harmless wrote:BAND MEETING!

it's probably closer to a conference call then that

Mine wrote:

EJ wrote:

harmless wrote:I feel they need some electronica / euphoric trance / trouse influences in this album to truly be able to call it experimental.

Nah, they just need Boom hammering away on an ondes Martenot or glockenspiel.

Pearl Jam being experimental sounds like such an oxymoron to me. They're just so far from it. I don't even mean it as criticism.
For some reason i can picture them successfully write a couple of tunes with some sort of a tribal rhythm but i wouldn't call even that experimental.

Agreed. If they ever were going to try, it would've happened 10+ years ago.

Mine wrote:

harmless wrote:BAND MEETING!

it's probably closer to a conference call then that

Is there a better picture you can recommend? I'm interested in your ideas.

harmless wrote:

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:i wanna be at this listening party

I'd rather be with an animal.

that could be dangerous

What is with this "Loser" thing going on here?

Mine wrote:

harmless wrote:BAND MEETING!

it's probably closer to a conference call then that

I would pay good money to see Eddie Vedder attempt to join a conference call without any assistance.

No listening party leaks yet?

McParadigm wrote:

Mine wrote:

harmless wrote:BAND MEETING!

it's probably closer to a conference call then that

I would pay good money to see Eddie Vedder attempt to join a conference call without any assistance.

THE LISTENING PARTY:

Have any of these listening parties resulted in someone's review of "eh"?

Or will the fanboys just tow the company line and say it was great?

EJ wrote:

Mine wrote:

EJ wrote:

harmless wrote:I feel they need some electronica / euphoric trance / trouse influences in this album to truly be able to call it experimental.

Nah, they just need Boom hammering away on an ondes Martenot or glockenspiel.

Pearl Jam being experimental sounds like such an oxymoron to me. They're just so far from it. I don't even mean it as criticism.
For some reason i can picture them successfully write a couple of tunes with some sort of a tribal rhythm but i wouldn't call even that experimental.

Agreed. If they ever were going to try, it would've happened 10+ years ago.

Honestly I'm not even sure. I was thinking if something like The End ended up on their "happy go lucky" album they're all but settled into sounding like Pearl Jam whatever the hell that means.

The best thing about this listening party in Berlin is that I can read the reviews and then compare them tomorrow at the listening party in Amsterdam.

The Listening Party

EJ wrote:Have any of these listening parties resulted in someone's review of "eh"?

Or will the fanboys just tow the company line and say it was great?

We've not had any listening parties yet, this is the first one. But yeah, I hope someone's honest. I honestly want to know this isn't a pop album. Or that it's less of one.

harmless wrote:

Mine wrote:

harmless wrote:BAND MEETING!

it's probably closer to a conference call then that

Is there a better picture you can recommend? I'm interested in your ideas.

Mine wrote:

harmless wrote:

Mine wrote:

harmless wrote:BAND MEETING!

it's probably closer to a conference call then that

Is there a better picture you can recommend? I'm interested in your ideas.

Strat wrote:What is with this "Loser" thing going on here?

since we are gonna be losers and sit around talking about a listening party that we cant be at, we figured we would represent

McParadigm wrote:

Mine wrote:

harmless wrote:BAND MEETING!

it's probably closer to a conference call then that

I would pay good money to see Eddie Vedder attempt to join a conference call without any assistance.

It's 2013. Either of his daughters would probably set it up in no time.