Page 356 of 792

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 22, 2015 12:19 am
by doug rr
boom

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 22, 2015 12:20 am
by doug rr
boom

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 22, 2015 12:22 am
by verb_to_trust
Big mets fan?

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 22, 2015 12:24 am
by doug rr
no

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 22, 2015 12:38 am
by verb_to_trust
Doug raging rectum

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 22, 2015 12:48 am
by spike
ugh

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 22, 2015 12:55 am
by swan
next year, Cubbies

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 22, 2015 1:00 am
by MadTIGERmaN
philpritchard wrote:MLB.TV allows you people in the US to watch the games provided you "authenticate through a supported Pay TV provider". For these purposes, it considers Canada part of the US, but it only allows you to authenticate with American TV providers. That seems like a poorly thought-out strategy.


how bout the fact that a lot of people who are using MLB.tv is because they decided to say "fuck you cable" and get rid of it, and just watch games online. so we dont have a cable tv provider to authenticate through.

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 22, 2015 1:12 am
by Norah
MadTIGERmaN wrote:
philpritchard wrote:MLB.TV allows you people in the US to watch the games provided you "authenticate through a supported Pay TV provider". For these purposes, it considers Canada part of the US, but it only allows you to authenticate with American TV providers. That seems like a poorly thought-out strategy.


how bout the fact that a lot of people who are using MLB.tv is because they decided to say "fuck you cable" and get rid of it, and just watch games online. so we dont have a cable tv provider to authenticate through.
I would pay more for MLB.tv without black out restrictions.

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 22, 2015 1:16 am
by verb_to_trust
I think the same thing every year with NBA League Pass

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 22, 2015 1:33 am
by Simple Torture

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 22, 2015 1:42 am
by philpritchard
MadTIGERmaN wrote:
philpritchard wrote:MLB.TV allows you people in the US to watch the games provided you "authenticate through a supported Pay TV provider". For these purposes, it considers Canada part of the US, but it only allows you to authenticate with American TV providers. That seems like a poorly thought-out strategy.


how bout the fact that a lot of people who are using MLB.tv is because they decided to say "fuck you cable" and get rid of it, and just watch games online. so we dont have a cable tv provider to authenticate through.
We're lucky because Rogers doesn't enforce the blackout surfing the regular season. The problem is during the playoffs, where I would happily use a friend's info to authenticate, we don't even have that option.

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 22, 2015 2:05 am
by E.H. Ruddock
Way to come through against Colon, Bryant.

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 22, 2015 3:32 am
by Chris_H_2
I sat next to a 300 pound man tonight. How fitting.

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 22, 2015 3:53 am
by E.H. Ruddock
Chris_H_2 wrote:I sat next to a 300 pound man tonight. How fitting.
Sabathia there supporting his fellow New Yorkers?

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 22, 2015 3:54 am
by Norah
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:I sat next to a 300 pound man tonight. How fitting.
Sabathia there supporting his fellow New Yorkers?
dude's on the wagon, no way

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 22, 2015 3:58 am
by lowlight79
I can't believe the mets did it. It's been a really crazy season. Hats off to the Cubs and here fans. I am gonna enjoy this pennant

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 22, 2015 12:51 pm
by spike
i'm sick of daniel murphy already; guy looks like a teacher. the announcers are already nicknaming him murph.

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 22, 2015 10:03 pm
by The Argonaut
Mattingly finally out as manager of the Dodgers. He's always looked like he was in way over his head the whole time he's had the job. I'm surprised this day didn't come last year or earlier. Yes, that is a really great, expensive roster. Of course, they'll win games and make the playoffs. But, there are a lot of big personalities and the front office didn't do anybody any favors by having more players on the roster than they could give an appropriate amount of playing time to. Whoever takes the job is going to have a hard time, but Mattingly never got a handle on things.

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 22, 2015 10:07 pm
by numbers
I don't really think this will change with a new manager, but it always seemed like Mattingly never had the respect of that team.