Page 37 of 55
Re: The Future of the GOP
Posted: Mon January 09, 2023 7:37 pm
by Bi_3
tragabigzanda wrote:wow imagine a world where big pharma has pull over legislation
It's uncommon at this level on such progressive policies from a very public red team figure, particularly in that Noem is definitely on the shortlist for VP in the next cycle.
Re: The Future of the GOP
Posted: Mon January 09, 2023 7:55 pm
by B
simple schoolboy wrote:Bi_3 wrote:
These are adults
Debatable.
Re: The Future of the GOP
Posted: Mon January 09, 2023 7:59 pm
by wease
B wrote:simple schoolboy wrote:Bi_3 wrote:
These are adults
Debatable.
That stoneface chick on the end is the only one that actually looks like she knows how to hold a gun.
Re: The Future of the GOP
Posted: Mon January 09, 2023 8:33 pm
by warehouse
"someone get the black guy a cowboy hat!"
Re: The Future of the GOP
Posted: Wed January 11, 2023 2:47 pm
by Bi_3
warehouse wrote:"someone get the black guy a cowboy hat!"
TBD on this guy, here he embarrasses Joy Reid to the point where she keeps repeating the opposite of what he says:
Re: The Future of the GOP
Posted: Wed January 11, 2023 3:04 pm
by Peeps
did he embarass her or was he avoiding answering the question?
her question was are you for privatizing medicare
his answer was that if you look back to 2006 the returns would have funded medicare which. this implies (whether or not) that he would be for privatizing medicare and yet he wouldnt come out and answer yes or no
Re: The Future of the GOP
Posted: Wed January 11, 2023 3:07 pm
by BurtReynolds
Peeps wrote:did he embarass her or was he avoiding answering the question?
her question was are you for privatizing medicare
his answer was that if you look back to 2006 the returns would have funded medicare which. this implies (whether or not) that he would be for privatizing medicare and yet he wouldnt come out and answer yes or no
lmao are you Joy Reid?
Re: The Future of the GOP
Posted: Wed January 11, 2023 3:08 pm
by Bi_3
Peeps wrote:did he embarass her or was he avoiding answering the question?
her question was are you for privatizing medicare
his answer was that if you look back to 2006 the returns would have funded medicare which. this implies (whether or not) that he would be for privatizing medicare and yet he wouldnt come out and answer yes or no
He says it explicitly at 1:17 and again at 1:23.
Re: The Future of the GOP
Posted: Wed January 11, 2023 3:12 pm
by BurtReynolds
Bi_3 wrote:Peeps wrote:did he embarass her or was he avoiding answering the question?
her question was are you for privatizing medicare
his answer was that if you look back to 2006 the returns would have funded medicare which. this implies (whether or not) that he would be for privatizing medicare and yet he wouldnt come out and answer yes or no
He says it explicitly at 1:17 and again at 1:23.
BUT WHY IS HE REFUSING TO ANSWER!?
Re: The Future of the GOP
Posted: Wed January 11, 2023 3:29 pm
by 4/5
That was really something to see. Reinforces why I quit watching cable news more than a decade ago.
The Social Security Administration says that Social Security will be insolvent by 2035.
Based on our best estimates, the 2022 reports determine:
• The Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund, which pays retirement and survivors benefits, will be able to pay scheduled benefits on a timely basis until 2034, one year later than reported last year. At that time, the fund's reserves will become depleted and continuing tax income will be sufficient to pay 77 percent of scheduled benefits.
https://www.ssa.gov/OACT/TRSUM/index.html
Re: The Future of the GOP
Posted: Wed January 11, 2023 3:40 pm
by Peeps
Bi_3 wrote:Peeps wrote:did he embarass her or was he avoiding answering the question?
her question was are you for privatizing medicare
his answer was that if you look back to 2006 the returns would have funded medicare which. this implies (whether or not) that he would be for privatizing medicare and yet he wouldnt come out and answer yes or no
He says it explicitly at 1:17 and again at 1:23.
he says no but argues that it would be better off using the S&P
thats like saying No i am not hungry but boy i sure could go for a burger
Re: The Future of the GOP
Posted: Tue January 17, 2023 2:15 am
by Biff Pocoroba
The new head of the House Oversight Committee is James Comer and he’s really going to get on my nerves the next two years.
Re: The Future of the GOP
Posted: Tue January 17, 2023 1:16 pm
by Bi_3
Re: The Future of the GOP
Posted: Tue January 17, 2023 1:41 pm
by wease
She couldn’t wear that in Missouri.
Re: The Future of the GOP
Posted: Tue January 17, 2023 2:30 pm
by Peeps
isnt that the old DA from law and order who had to fake her death?
Re: The Future of the GOP
Posted: Tue January 17, 2023 8:08 pm
by Bi_3
Why not kick them both out?
Re: Congress
Posted: Fri January 20, 2023 12:20 pm
by B
Wow. This Santos stuff is mind blowing.
Re: Congress
Posted: Fri January 20, 2023 12:44 pm
by Bi_3
B wrote:Wow. This Santos stuff is mind blowing.
It's like the mfers didn't even run a google search.
Re: Congress
Posted: Fri January 20, 2023 1:54 pm
by Peeps
Bi_3 wrote:B wrote:Wow. This Santos stuff is mind blowing.
It's like the mfers didn't even run a google search.
dont fool yourself. they knew. but they dont care because he won and it gives them a body. it's amazing to me that Al Franken resigned over a photograph that trump and others questioned and raised concerns about his character but just shrug their shoulders with a big ol "Meh" response
Re: Congress
Posted: Fri January 20, 2023 5:18 pm
by wease
Peeps wrote:Bi_3 wrote:B wrote:Wow. This Santos stuff is mind blowing.
It's like the mfers didn't even run a google search.
dont fool yourself. they knew. but they dont care because he won and it gives them a body. it's amazing to me that Al Franken resigned over a photograph that trump and others questioned and raised concerns about his character but just shrug their shoulders with a big ol "Meh" response
Just shows more and more of their hypocrisy and that their true agenda is nothing more than being anti-democrat. They have no desire to actually make anything better. All that matters is sticking it to the dems
