Red Mosquito

Electromatic wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:I didn't watch the game. Why was it unexciting? Because of bad/sloppy play or just because it was low scoring?

1) Because it's really really stupid to play an NFL game on Thursday 3.5 days after both teams just played a game.

2) Matt Barkley was playing QB because Bryan Hoyer broke his arm...and 2 WR's led the team in rushing for GB because the RB situation is dire. There must be some rule that the Bears have to be semi terrible at QB.

It was just the standard predictably sloppy awful Thursday Night Football game. The Packers eventually wore down the Bears defense and scored enough.

Gotcha. I do really hate the Thursday night game. Though, I don't have an issue with your second point, at least on paper. That actually sounds really exciting depending on how you look at it.

durdencommatyler wrote:

Electromatic wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:I didn't watch the game. Why was it unexciting? Because of bad/sloppy play or just because it was low scoring?

1) Because it's really really stupid to play an NFL game on Thursday 3.5 days after both teams just played a game.

2) Matt Barkley was playing QB because Bryan Hoyer broke his arm...and 2 WR's led the team in rushing for GB because the RB situation is dire. There must be some rule that the Bears have to be semi terrible at QB.

It was just the standard predictably sloppy awful Thursday Night Football game. The Packers eventually wore down the Bears defense and scored enough.

Gotcha. I do really hate the Thursday night game. Though, I don't have an issue with your second point, at least on paper. That actually sounds really exciting depending on how you look at it.

I mean I watched some of it, actually watching Cobb and Davonte Adams was pretty awesome. Also Leonard Floyd had a nice strip sack touchdown for the Bears. But, the Bears offense is just awful.

They really are. I wish I could feel bad for them. But....

So the NFL really done fucked up good with the Josh Brown stuff. Yesterday they said that the Sheriff's office refused to give them any info--today, the sheriff's office said that they got an e-mail from a comcast.net address requesting info, but the person didn't ID themselves as employed by the NFL, so they basically ignored it.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... osh-brown/

Fuck Goodell.

durdencommatyler wrote:Fuck Goodell.

and all those monkeys she studies

Peeps wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:Fuck Goodell.

and all those monkeys she studies

God I love her

E.H. Ruddock wrote:God I love her

I like how she always looks like she's smelling a fart but trying to put on a smile through it

E.H. Ruddock wrote:God I love her

I'd put her on my Friend List if my wife would let me. But I feel like she'd veto.

durdencommatyler wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:God I love her

I'd put her on my Friend List if my wife would let me. But I feel like she'd veto.

There's veto power?

Also...too far. C'mon. http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... lebration/

Let them celebrate. If it's crass or over the line, then okay; penalty and fine. But, this and things like it should be allowed.

Self wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:God I love her

I'd put her on my Friend List if my wife would let me. But I feel like she'd veto.

There's veto power?

Oh, absolutely.

durdencommatyler wrote:

Self wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:God I love her

I'd put her on my Friend List if my wife would let me. But I feel like she'd veto.

There's veto power?

Oh, absolutely.

Have you ever vetoed one of her choices?

Self wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

Self wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:God I love her

I'd put her on my Friend List if my wife would let me. But I feel like she'd veto.

There's veto power?

Oh, absolutely.

Have you ever vetoed one of her choices?

Oh, I should explain....

So obviously there's "The List" everyone is familiar with. (for those who don't know: it comes from the show FRIENDS; it's 5 celebrities you're allowed to sleep with and your significant other can't get mad). Well, my best friend (he's a dude) and I ALSO have a list of 5 celebrities that I'm allowed to be best friends with over him and he can't get mad.

That BF list gets complicated because you can't have any crossover. Like, I can't befriend someone who could potentially be on my other list. Likewise, I shouldn't befriend someone that is (or is married to) someone on my wife's list. Like, I could say, oh yeah Jason Sudeikis is totes on my friend list. Except that Olivia Wilde is on my "celebs I can sleep with list." So my wife has every right to veto that vote. Because I can't in good conscious befriend someone whose wife I want to bang. Make sense?

So, yeah, my wife would totally veto Annd Kendrick on my friend list. Now, I could put her on my "bang list" and she couldn't veto that. But I'd rather not put her on that list. I'd want her on my "best friend list."

And THAT is how you kill an NFL thread, team.

durdencommatyler wrote:And THAT is how you kill an NFL thread, team.

fuck Goodell and the puppet owners who support his ridiculous decisions, which are all wrong. Yay! London.

nice return by collins...not sure why he didn't bounce it out toward the sideline when he got within in the 10, but hey he got in

watching football during sermon time is a sin, lenny