Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Fri January 25, 2019 6:23 pm
Did you read the whole article? We are talking about how women and minorities are presented in the show, and also compared to the books.
I'm not lamenting anything. I'm defending Joe's (and anyone else's) right to discuss the topic without being attacked by you. Please pay attentionBammer wrote:Your lamenting over the depiction of the medieval world and its inequities featuring fictional characters is so impressively woketheplatypus wrote:Take your whining to the "I'm a middle-aged infant" threadBammer wrote:Take it to the “I’m holier than thou and like to hear myself talk” threadtheplatypus wrote:The conversation that's happened in the last couple pages is way more interesting than a bunch of geeky speculation about who is getting killed next in this stupid dragon showBammer wrote:Your diatribes are incredibly boring and you’re sucking the life out of this threaddurdencommatyler wrote:Tell others to stop asking me direct questions about my thoughts on this shit then. There's no soapbox, champ. It's just conversation.Bammer wrote:Durden get off your fucking soap box.
That was interesting. Thank you.Blaine Ryan wrote:So, I have no stake whatsoever in this argument (I don't follow the show and it's been years since I've read the books), but no joke: this video just popped up in my YouTube recommendations. Total serendipity. I thought it might be of interest to some of you.
True, but I think that the excerpt from the "article" (it's a Wiki page on a fandom website, which I think is worth mentioning) that you posted makes a big deal about the raw number of people of color the show has (which has been mentioned in passing, but really hasn't been the thrust of anyone's point in this thread) and about how it's just cleaving to the books when it comes to what is presented on-screen; it also dovetails into a very, very strange bit of whataboutism at the end that I am still scratching my head over. At least Joey and myself have both made the point that we're referring to criticisms of the show that focus on how material is presented versus what is presented, and we're not necessarily condemning or defending the show--just bringing up other complex, difficult, and at times unfamiliar perspectives that have colored how we read it.Anders wrote:Did you read the whole article? We are talking about how women and minorities are presented in the show, and also compared to the books.
I think the full article shows how the books (and the show by mostly following the books), actually turns fantasy on its head, and treats everyone the same. Both men and women can be raped, killed or enslaved, and the rich people are no better than the poor, even if they often judge the poor as worse. In asoiaf it also doesn’t matter what color you are, or if you are a dwarf or have lost your legs.Simple Torture wrote:True, but I think that the excerpt from the "article" (it's a Wiki page on a fandom website, which I think is worth mentioning) that you posted makes a big deal about the raw number of people of color the show has (which has been mentioned in passing, but really hasn't been the thrust of anyone's point in this thread) and about how it's just cleaving to the books when it comes to what is presented on-screen; it also dovetails into a very, very strange bit of whataboutism at the end that I am still scratching my head over. At least Joey and myself have both made the point that we're referring to criticisms of the show that focus on how material is presented versus what is presented, and we're not necessarily condemning or defending the show--just bringing up other complex, difficult, and at times unfamiliar perspectives that have colored how we read it.Anders wrote:Did you read the whole article? We are talking about how women and minorities are presented in the show, and also compared to the books.
Maybe for you it hasn’t...durdencommatyler wrote:That's different though because never one has a penis been titillating or exploitative.Monkey_Driven wrote:Joey is forgetting about the totally unnecessary full frontal peen too.
Mecca wrote:Maybe for you it hasn’t...durdencommatyler wrote:That's different though because never one has a penis been titillating or exploitative.Monkey_Driven wrote:Joey is forgetting about the totally unnecessary full frontal peen too.
I watched the first 5:30 and George gives a very politeBlaine Ryan wrote:So, I have no stake whatsoever in this argument (I don't follow the show and it's been years since I've read the books), but no joke: this video just popped up in my YouTube recommendations. Total serendipity. I thought it might be of interest to some of you.
hey motherfucker did you get your book?Mecca wrote:Maybe for you it hasn’t...durdencommatyler wrote:That's different though because never one has a penis been titillating or exploitative.Monkey_Driven wrote:Joey is forgetting about the totally unnecessary full frontal peen too.
Setting our feud aside - you’ve been looking at all the wrong penises your whole life! I can recommend some links.durdencommatyler wrote:That's different though because never one has a penis been titillating or exploitative.Monkey_Driven wrote:Joey is forgetting about the totally unnecessary full frontal peen too.
I did!BurtReynolds wrote:hey motherfucker did you get your book?Mecca wrote:Maybe for you it hasn’t...durdencommatyler wrote:That's different though because never one has a penis been titillating or exploitative.Monkey_Driven wrote:Joey is forgetting about the totally unnecessary full frontal peen too.
I get that. I'm not trying to be insufferable or miserable about it. I'm certainly not gonna Chud all over you. There's limited time for everything, the books get the benefit of more space and detail. I just thought I remembered the show getting into Three Eyed Raven's story more than it does.Strat wrote:Man, im so glad I haven't read the books. Book readers are miserable when it comes to the show!
I would imagine, from what I know of the books, there is just no way to tell the entire story or please everyone.durdencommatyler wrote:I get that. I'm not trying to be insufferable or miserable about it. I'm certainly not gonna Chud all over you. There's limited time for everything, the books get the benefit of more space and detail. I just thought I remembered the show getting into Three Eyed Raven's story more than it does.Strat wrote:Man, im so glad I haven't read the books. Book readers are miserable when it comes to the show!
I think the show does a lot of things better than the books, too. They are each their own thing. Both with various strengths and weaknesses.
Certainly no way to please everyone. But there is absolutely a way to tell the entire story. The show has cut some corners and made some unnecessary concessions (some of which hurt the story and make no goddamn sense). I like many of the choices the show has made. But given what they've done, there is absolutely a way to have done it better. Still...Strat wrote:I would imagine, from what I know of the books, there is just no way to tell the entire story or please everyone.durdencommatyler wrote:I get that. I'm not trying to be insufferable or miserable about it. I'm certainly not gonna Chud all over you. There's limited time for everything, the books get the benefit of more space and detail. I just thought I remembered the show getting into Three Eyed Raven's story more than it does.Strat wrote:Man, im so glad I haven't read the books. Book readers are miserable when it comes to the show!
I think the show does a lot of things better than the books, too. They are each their own thing. Both with various strengths and weaknesses.
SUCH a piece of shit.wease wrote:Fucking Ramsay. I hope he dies soon.