Re: Anybody want a Corona?
Posted: Thu July 23, 2020 1:45 am


Not sure if sarcasm, but over here they were extremely accurate.verb_to_trust wrote:All the graphs from April were so super accurate hereAngus wrote:This is the model currently predicting Belgium if we don't go back to at least some more restrictions very urgently
This is why we need separate threads.Angus wrote:Not sure if sarcasm, but over here they were extremely accurate.verb_to_trust wrote:All the graphs from April were so super accurate hereAngus wrote:This is the model currently predicting Belgium if we don't go back to at least some more restrictions very urgently
The problem is that models are built by taking known data (the observed infection rates/behaviors/chronology thus far) and applying them to hypotheticals. Because the people constructing the models are intelligent, scientifically-minded folk, they failed to predict how incredibly stupid people in our nation can be.Angus wrote:Not sure if sarcasm, but over here they were extremely accurate.verb_to_trust wrote:All the graphs from April were so super accurate hereAngus wrote:This is the model currently predicting Belgium if we don't go back to at least some more restrictions very urgently
McParadigm wrote:What a headline![]()
"Hmmmm ... what slogan can earn us the least sympathy from those who are unsure whether they should be giving us more taxpayer money?"The Argonaut wrote:McParadigm wrote:What a headline![]()
![]()
![]()
This is the silliest take.B wrote:"Hmmmm ... what slogan can earn us the least sympathy from those who are unsure whether they should be giving us more taxpayer money?"The Argonaut wrote:McParadigm wrote:What a headline![]()
![]()
![]()

North Carolina didn’t crack a thousand cases a day until roughly the start of June.B wrote:I have a small amount of morbid pride that NC has a lot fewer deaths than other states with similar rates of disease.
MA: 114K cases, 8,500 deaths
PA: 108K cases, 7,100 deaths
NC: 105K cases, 1,700 deaths
LA: 99K cases, 3,700 deaths
MI: 84K deaths, 6,400 deaths
It's all timing. Those other states got hit first. NC is lucky I bet there's a huge population of fat fucks down there. Good they weren't first in line.B wrote:I have a small amount of morbid pride that NC has a lot fewer deaths than other states with similar rates of disease.
MA: 114K cases, 8,500 deaths
PA: 108K cases, 7,100 deaths
NC: 105K cases, 1,700 deaths
LA: 99K cases, 3,700 deaths
MI: 84K deaths, 6,400 deaths
as long as theyre all dead by November, yea?verb_to_trust wrote:It's all timing. Those other states got hit first. NC is lucky I bet there's a huge population of fat fucks down there. Good they weren't first in line.B wrote:I have a small amount of morbid pride that NC has a lot fewer deaths than other states with similar rates of disease.
MA: 114K cases, 8,500 deaths
PA: 108K cases, 7,100 deaths
NC: 105K cases, 1,700 deaths
LA: 99K cases, 3,700 deaths
MI: 84K deaths, 6,400 deaths
Testing at all seems like a giant waste of time and money at this pointStrat wrote:as long as theyre all dead by November, yea?verb_to_trust wrote:It's all timing. Those other states got hit first. NC is lucky I bet there's a huge population of fat fucks down there. Good they weren't first in line.B wrote:I have a small amount of morbid pride that NC has a lot fewer deaths than other states with similar rates of disease.
MA: 114K cases, 8,500 deaths
PA: 108K cases, 7,100 deaths
NC: 105K cases, 1,700 deaths
LA: 99K cases, 3,700 deaths
MI: 84K deaths, 6,400 deaths
Rob wrote:Glad to be where I am, but I'm sure this will change when school starts.