Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri October 21, 2016 4:01 pm
plat, your very brief live-post of watching Trump's speech was a delight.
Page 367 of 472
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri October 21, 2016 4:02 pm
The divide along the Cascades is even starker. Congress really did a shitty job splitting up the old Oregon Territory in the 19th century.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri October 21, 2016 4:08 pm
Oh man thats fucking atrocious. What a specimen that trump is. Glad he got booed finally
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri October 21, 2016 4:08 pm
On the culture disparity thing, I'd say that you really don't see most of it when traveling. You have to live in a place and be a part of the population in order to really start to see what defines it. South Dakota, Omaha, Chicago, Phoenix, and Seattle all seem like variations of an American "type" when you visit. Stick around for a year or more, and nuanced differences become more clear...and their significance more evident.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri October 21, 2016 4:13 pm
FUCK ICE
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri October 21, 2016 4:17 pm
I think the strangest place I lived was in Yuma, AZ. Half of the city lived there year-round and had to deal with change almost constantly because of the different populations: Snowbirds in the winter and tourists in the summer. It was a constant service industry coupled with the two military bases and it was strange to see how liberal and conservative everyone was at the same time. And it's not like they were moderate either, they just had enough change and upheavel and also a stolid life that was the same every day to be a little of everything.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri October 21, 2016 4:28 pm
I live in a very strange place. A mix of 1%ers, redneck conspiracy theorists, tree hugging hippies, and uneducated bro's who most likely dont have a college degree and are completely detached from politics.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri October 21, 2016 4:37 pm
FUCK ICE
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri October 21, 2016 4:39 pm
This is still cracking me up
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri October 21, 2016 5:00 pm
The look Rudy has on his face for the statue of Liberty joke was great. He was so confused!
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri October 21, 2016 5:06 pm
He reminded me of Joaquin Phoenix watching the gladiator kick the shit out of better-armed centurions.bune wrote:The look Rudy has on his face for the statue of Liberty joke was great. He was so confused!
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri October 21, 2016 5:08 pm
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri October 21, 2016 5:25 pm
Yeah, that's a good description.
And what's up with the guy just behind Hillary, the one wearing that weird blue cross? He's sweating like he had Chipotle for lunch and it's disagreeing with him fiercely.
And what's up with the guy just behind Hillary, the one wearing that weird blue cross? He's sweating like he had Chipotle for lunch and it's disagreeing with him fiercely.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri October 21, 2016 6:08 pm
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri October 21, 2016 6:40 pm
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri October 21, 2016 7:55 pm
I feel like people who support Gary Johnson only do so to make themselves feel better about not supporting a two party system. Not being a "sheep". LIke they are really sticking it to the system here.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri October 21, 2016 7:57 pm
FUCK ICE
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri October 21, 2016 8:01 pm
No you donttragabigzanda wrote:Strat wrote:I feel like people who support Gary Johnson only do so to make themselves feel better about not supporting a two party system. Not being a "sheep". LIke they are really sticking it to the system here.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri October 21, 2016 8:07 pm
FUCK ICE
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri October 21, 2016 8:09 pm
Respect. I can groove on that jam.tragabigzanda wrote:Absolutely I do, insofar as I'll be voting for him (but it's not like I'm donating to his campaign or anything). Here's what's looking for MT's three electoral votes: http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/201 ... t/montana/Strat wrote:No you donttragabigzanda wrote:Strat wrote:I feel like people who support Gary Johnson only do so to make themselves feel better about not supporting a two party system. Not being a "sheep". LIke they are really sticking it to the system here.
I can safely support a third-party candidate that has a great shot of getting his 5%, which, as Argo (I think?) clarified earlier, will qualify the Libs for public funding ever forward, but won't directly get them into the debates (though presumably they could get there by polling higher numbers once they have tax dollars at their disposal).
I wouldn't vote this way if I lived in a swing state. But here in MT, it's not about "sticking it to the system" -- it's about increasing the dialogue going forward.