The Supreme Court
- Bi_3
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16452
- Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
Slightly NSFW stuff in sidebar, it is the dailymail after all:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -pick.html
At least they changed who allegedly wrote each one.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -pick.html
At least they changed who allegedly wrote each one.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
- B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 25045
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: The Supreme Court
"Mystery," they say? Someone put the letter on-line and said, "send this to your local newspaper." I don't think you need to be Sherlock Holmes for that one.Bi_3 wrote:Slightly NSFW stuff in sidebar, it is the dailymail after all:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -pick.html
At least they changed who allegedly wrote each one.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
- B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 25045
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: The Supreme Court

Just in case you're wondering how this Kavanaugh things is going to turn out.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: The Supreme Court
If the court is intended to be (somewhat) representational of the country, then the coming polarized bench looks about right.B wrote:
Just in case you're wondering how this Kavanaugh things is going to turn out.
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
These left/right charts always are unable to accurately place Thomas. There have been some cases in which he reaches a "left" result that get balanced out when he fires off a solo dissent or concurrence in the judgment that's coded as being further to the "right". Someone like Alito is much more consistently right ruling even though he doesn't write separately as much as Thomas.
I'm hoping we get a 5-4 ruling from Thomas + the Democratic appointees that either strikes down or curtails civil asset forfeiture--that ought to really scramble these models. That's the rare issue where the far left and far right agree, but the squishy middle of the Court like Kennedy or O'Connor would disagree.
I'm hoping we get a 5-4 ruling from Thomas + the Democratic appointees that either strikes down or curtails civil asset forfeiture--that ought to really scramble these models. That's the rare issue where the far left and far right agree, but the squishy middle of the Court like Kennedy or O'Connor would disagree.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: The Supreme Court
It’s interesting that a Supreme Court candidate can be above water in the polls and also be historically unpopular as a nominee.
(patriotic choking noises)
- bart
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4197
- Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 10:23 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
Who doesn't love judges? There's a whole book in the bible just dedicated to them.
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29881
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: The Supreme Court
which justice would you like to bang most?
roberts is dreamy, and seniority turns me on; but gorsuch has that 'new guy' rebel to him which i find irresistable
roberts is dreamy, and seniority turns me on; but gorsuch has that 'new guy' rebel to him which i find irresistable
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51690
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Wed January 14, 2026 8:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29881
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: The Supreme Court
see, this is why we need pollster rights
i can't adequately assess this issue without a poll
it's just too difficult to keep a manual tally with all these responses coming back
i can't adequately assess this issue without a poll
it's just too difficult to keep a manual tally with all these responses coming back
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- bune
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9359
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
- Location: Washington State
Re: The Supreme Court
Tangentially SC related.
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: The Supreme Court
Is there a conflict among district courts regarding civil asset forfeiture coming up? Is that too much to hope for?Green Habit wrote:These left/right charts always are unable to accurately place Thomas. There have been some cases in which he reaches a "left" result that get balanced out when he fires off a solo dissent or concurrence in the judgment that's coded as being further to the "right". Someone like Alito is much more consistently right ruling even though he doesn't write separately as much as Thomas.
I'm hoping we get a 5-4 ruling from Thomas + the Democratic appointees that either strikes down or curtails civil asset forfeiture--that ought to really scramble these models. That's the rare issue where the far left and far right agree, but the squishy middle of the Court like Kennedy or O'Connor would disagree.
I'm disheartened to hear that Kavanagh is weak on some aspects of the 4th, but I'll take him versus the likely alternate.
I personally look forward to the first orthodox christian supreme court justice.
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29881
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: The Supreme Court
because since 1789 they were mostly buddhists, jews, and atheistssimple schoolboy wrote: I personally look forward to the first orthodox christian supreme court justice.
finally the tide is turning
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- 4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6989
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
I mean we did have a remarkable streak of an all Catholic and Jewish Supreme Court going there for awhile.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
- Bi_3
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16452
- Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
WTF Democrats. Stop acting like little babies and get on with it.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
- Bi_3
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16452
- Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
This is the Dems version of “her missing emails”
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37453
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: The Supreme Court
Or they could just release all the documents.
- Bi_3
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16452
- Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
Please. I don’t want this guy on the court, but there is something like 300+ cases to judge him on. Performance art falsely creating a hope that you can stall until the election is the worst kind of disrespectful politics there is.cutuphalfdead wrote:Or they could just release all the documents.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51690
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Wed January 14, 2026 8:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: The Supreme Court
You feel that majority document withholding for a Supreme Court nominee, insistence on pre-submitted questions, and refusal to delay a few days so people have time to read yesterday’s dump is, therefore, not the worst kind of disrespectful politics there is.Bi_3 wrote:Please. I don’t want this guy on the court, but there is something like 300+ cases to judge him on. Performance art falsely creating a hope that you can stall until the election is the worst kind of disrespectful politics there is.cutuphalfdead wrote:Or they could just release all the documents.
(patriotic choking noises)