Re: Backspacer: Official Album Thread
Posted: Sat May 21, 2016 2:34 am
Oh, you're definitely RM.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I'm not sure Spenno and I should be considered representative of RM
Oh, you're definitely RM.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I'm not sure Spenno and I should be considered representative of RM
You're right, I should only look at the five guys above you in post count.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I'm not sure Spenno and I should be considered representative of RM
Don't do it, man.darth_vedder wrote:I don't think I've been listened to this album for at least four years. Maybe 5. I suppose I'll revisit it at some point.
yeah, i thought about it too. Backspacer is cohesive in a way LB is not. I guess my main problem with LB is that it feels like a greatest hits with all the moods and version we know about the band instead of a proper album.evenslow wrote:March Madness always makes me rethink different parts of the catalogue and for whatever reason this year it's Backspacer.
It all hangs together rather well. I like that it at least sounds of a piece, unlike Lightning Bolt.
I like everything save for Amongst the Waves and would replace Supersonic with Ole.
Suppressive post!PHATJ wrote:Don't do it, man.darth_vedder wrote:I don't think I've been listened to this album for at least four years. Maybe 5. I suppose I'll revisit it at some point.
Haha, I probably won't, at least anytime soon. I have no desire to listen to it or LB. never say never though I suppose.PHATJ wrote:Don't do it, man.darth_vedder wrote:I don't think I've been listened to this album for at least four years. Maybe 5. I suppose I'll revisit it at some point.
Damn. Stip was rightdarth_vedder wrote:Haha, I probably won'tPHATJ wrote:Don't do it, man.darth_vedder wrote:I don't think I've been listened to this album for at least four years. Maybe 5. I suppose I'll revisit it at some point.
About what?theplatypus wrote:Damn. Stip was rightdarth_vedder wrote:Haha, I probably won'tPHATJ wrote:Don't do it, man.darth_vedder wrote:I don't think I've been listened to this album for at least four years. Maybe 5. I suppose I'll revisit it at some point.
Very little.darth_vedder wrote:About what?theplatypus wrote:Damn. Stip was rightdarth_vedder wrote:Haha, I probably won'tPHATJ wrote:Don't do it, man.darth_vedder wrote:I don't think I've been listened to this album for at least four years. Maybe 5. I suppose I'll revisit it at some point.
Haha! But man, I love stip. he's terribly wrong about PJ, but I wouldn't have him any other way.PHATJ wrote:Very little.darth_vedder wrote:About what?theplatypus wrote:Damn. Stip was rightdarth_vedder wrote:Haha, I probably won'tPHATJ wrote:Don't do it, man.darth_vedder wrote:I don't think I've been listened to this album for at least four years. Maybe 5. I suppose I'll revisit it at some point.
darth_vedder wrote:Haha! But man, I love stip. he's terribly wrong about PJ, but I wouldn't have him any other way.PHATJ wrote:Very little.darth_vedder wrote:About what?theplatypus wrote:Damn. Stip was rightdarth_vedder wrote:Haha, I probably won'tPHATJ wrote:Don't do it, man.darth_vedder wrote:I don't think I've been listened to this album for at least four years. Maybe 5. I suppose I'll revisit it at some point.
As Billiam Shakespeare once said, "theplatypus doth protest too much."theplatypus wrote:Suppressive post!PHATJ wrote:Don't do it, man.darth_vedder wrote:I don't think I've been listened to this album for at least four years. Maybe 5. I suppose I'll revisit it at some point.