Ghostbusters (2016)

Strat · Post by **Strat** » Wed August 10, 2016 5:31 pm

no sweat of my sac

E.H. Ruddock · Post by **E.H. Ruddock** » Wed August 10, 2016 5:32 pm

I wouldn't mind a spinoff with just Chris Hemsworth's character.

Strat · Post by **Strat** » Wed August 10, 2016 5:37 pm

"We're very proud of the bold movie Paul Feig made, which critics and audiences loved," a studio rep tells THR. "It has enlivened a 30-year-old brand and put it into the modern zeitgeist. As a result, we have many ideas in the works to further exploit the Ghostbusters universe."

I know that word was meant well in the context but thats kind of lol. I like the honesty.

I seriously dont even remember who the bad guy was or the ending of this film.

So bad.

spike · Post by **spike** » Wed August 10, 2016 6:40 pm

Strat wrote:
"We're very proud of the bold movie Paul Feig made, which critics and audiences loved," a studio rep tells THR. "It has enlivened a 30-year-old brand and put it into the modern zeitgeist. As a result, we have many ideas in the works to further exploit the Ghostbusters universe."
I know that word was meant well in the context but thats kind of lol. I like the honesty.

I seriously dont even remember who the bad guy was or the ending of this film.

So bad.

In the end, the bad guy was misogyny.

LoathedVermin72 · Post by **LoathedVermin72** » Wed August 10, 2016 6:52 pm

theplatypus wrote:'Ghostbusters' Heading for $70M-Plus Loss, Sequel Unlikely

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/g ... uel-918515

"Confronted by tepid box office for the reboot, the studio will instead focus on animated spinoffs."

Good

VinylGuy · Post by **VinylGuy** » Wed August 10, 2016 7:09 pm

I want to see it, but i think its gone from the cinemas here.

Post by **epilogue** » Wed August 10, 2016 7:17 pm

Doesn't surprise me one bit. And I'm totally fine with it. As much as I loved the movie and laughed my ass off, I don't need a sequel. Much like the original, it can only do more harm than good.

My hope is that Hollywood can start to find fresh ideas. Let's get the gang back together in something new and not based on a property made popular a billion years ago by a bunch of dudes.

Let these ladies have their own thing. I like that idea much better.

VinylGuy · Post by **VinylGuy** » Wed August 10, 2016 9:02 pm

I guess this was their ¨lets get the gang back¨ film as the director and two stars already worked together.

Im actually dying to see this just to consider how good or bad is it.

Post by **stip** » Wed August 10, 2016 9:17 pm

durdencommatyler wrote:Doesn't surprise me one bit. And I'm totally fine with it. As much as I loved the movie and laughed my ass off, I don't need a sequel. Much like the original, it can only do more harm than good.

My hope is that Hollywood can start to find fresh ideas. Let's get the gang back together in something new and not based on a property made popular a billion years ago by a bunch of dudes.

Let these ladies have their own thing. I like that idea much better.

Given that the movie lost money, I think they probably overspent on special effects (unless this was a really pricey cast, which I presume it wasn't). They can get by with the ghosts looking cheesy, and the action sequences were the weakest parts of the movies. It was the characters and banter that were the best parts of the movie, and you didn't need that CGI slugfest in the back third of the movie.

Post by **epilogue** » Wed August 10, 2016 9:18 pm

stip wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Doesn't surprise me one bit. And I'm totally fine with it. As much as I loved the movie and laughed my ass off, I don't need a sequel. Much like the original, it can only do more harm than good.

My hope is that Hollywood can start to find fresh ideas. Let's get the gang back together in something new and not based on a property made popular a billion years ago by a bunch of dudes.

Let these ladies have their own thing. I like that idea much better.

Given that the movie lost money, I think they probably overspent on special effects (unless this was a really pricey cast, which I presume it wasn't). They can get by with the ghosts looking cheesy, and the action sequences were the weakest parts of the movies. It was the characters and banter that were the best parts of the movie, and you didn't need that CGI slugfest in the back third of the movie.

Mostly agree. I would say Kate McKinnon kicking all kinds of ass in the finale was one of my favorite parts of the movie.

LoathedVermin72 · Post by **LoathedVermin72** » Thu August 25, 2016 12:07 am

This Leslie Jones shit has become straight-up heartbreaking. Fucking people.

@SkitchP · Post by **@SkitchP** » Thu August 25, 2016 12:10 am

LoathedVermin72 wrote:This Leslie Jones shit has become straight-up heartbreaking. Fucking people.

It's fucking terrible. Im going to go like this movie just to spite those douches

E.H. Ruddock · Post by **E.H. Ruddock** » Thu August 25, 2016 12:10 am

LoathedVermin72 wrote:This Leslie Jones shit has become straight-up heartbreaking. Fucking people.

What now?

LoathedVermin72 · Post by **LoathedVermin72** » Thu August 25, 2016 12:11 am

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:This Leslie Jones shit has become straight-up heartbreaking. Fucking people.
What now?

People hacked her website and posted stolen nude photos, and images of her passport and driver's license.

Post by **epilogue** » Thu August 25, 2016 12:17 am

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:This Leslie Jones shit has become straight-up heartbreaking. Fucking people.
What now?
People hacked her website and posted stolen nude photos, and images of her passport and driver's license.

Jesus....

Post by **epilogue** » Thu August 25, 2016 12:18 am

Regardless of whether or not you like the movie (and it's totally fine either way) this is disgusting behavior. I fucking hate people.

E.H. Ruddock · Post by **E.H. Ruddock** » Thu August 25, 2016 12:20 am

I'm pretty close to freaking out and going on a rampage

LoathedVermin72 · Post by **LoathedVermin72** » Thu August 25, 2016 12:20 am

durdencommatyler wrote:Regardless of whether or not you like the movie (and it's totally fine either way) this is disgusting behavior. I fucking hate people.

This movie looks terrible and I can't stand Leslie Jones, but fucking Christ, what is even happening anymore? This level of harassment is insane. Like, actually insane. I don't understand it at all. This is a new low for fanboys. Truly the scum of the earth. The Twitter mob was one thing...but this? I just... Man. Fuck everyone.

Post by **epilogue** » Thu August 25, 2016 12:21 am

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Regardless of whether or not you like the movie (and it's totally fine either way) this is disgusting behavior. I fucking hate people.
This movie looks terrible and I can't stand Leslie Jones, but fucking Christ, what is even happening anymore? This level of harassment is insane. Like, actually insane. I don't understand it at all. This is a new low for fanboys. Truly the scum of the earth.

100% agree. I happened to like the movie; totally understand why others don't. But this is just way too far beyond....

I feel terrible. I hate the world.

E.H. Ruddock · Post by **E.H. Ruddock** » Thu August 25, 2016 12:34 am

I want to see the interview scene again. I laughed so fucking hard at that scene

Red Mosquito

Ghostbusters (2016)

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)