Page 373 of 508
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Mon February 25, 2019 7:35 pm
by Anders
durdencommatyler wrote:I wouldn't be pissed but I'm not sure what it would add to the story at this point. Especially since we only have like two episodes left. Feels unnecessary and impotent with the time remaining.
But they should have fucking done it in the first place.
The new season is not far off past seasons in time, and longer than the OT or Godfather 1 and 2 combined.
Episode 801: 60 minutes
Episode 802: 60 minutes
Episode 803: 80 minutes
Episode 804: 80 minutes
Episode 805: 80 minutes
Episode 806: 80 minutes
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Mon February 25, 2019 7:39 pm
by epilogue
I know. I'm exaggerating because I'm still bitter that they divided the final season into two seasons. And then made us wait an extra long time for "season 8."
My point still stands, though. I don't see the point in doing #6 at this point. They should have done it in S3 or 4 if they were going to do it.
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Mon February 25, 2019 7:46 pm
by Chris_H_2
cutuphalfdead wrote:Chris_H_2 wrote:
i'll be pissed if #6 (today's) came to pass.
Why would you be pissed about that?
because there already are enough lose ends. based on quickly they went through plots and timelines last season, the last thing that this needs is to shoe horn something like that in among 6 episodes.
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Mon February 25, 2019 7:47 pm
by Chris_H_2
team joe
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Mon February 25, 2019 7:48 pm
by Anders
Chris_H_2 wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:Chris_H_2 wrote:
i'll be pissed if #6 (today's) came to pass.
Why would you be pissed about that?
because there already are enough lose ends. based on quickly they went through plots and timelines last season, the last thing that this needs is to shoe horn something like that in among 6 episodes.
If they use the time right, there is plenty of time for anything. 7 hours and 20 minutes. Longer than most movie trilogies.
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Mon February 25, 2019 7:50 pm
by epilogue
But there are so many other things that would require reworking to make it happen. And is that element a vital part of the endgame?
Just leave it alone.
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Mon February 25, 2019 7:53 pm
by Chris_H_2
also
- Spoiler: show
- how would they go about explaining on how it happened with beric dondarrion still hanging around?
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Mon February 25, 2019 7:55 pm
by Norah
durdencommatyler wrote:I wouldn't be pissed but I'm not sure what it would add to the story at this point. Especially since we only have like two episodes left. Feels unnecessary and impotent with the time remaining.
But they should have fucking done it in the first place.
Agreed.
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Mon February 25, 2019 7:56 pm
by Norah
Chris_H_2 wrote:also
- Spoiler: show
- how would they go about explaining on how it happened with beric dondarrion still hanging around?
Excellent point.
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Mon February 25, 2019 8:11 pm
by epilogue
Chris_H_2 wrote:also
- Spoiler: show
- how would they go about explaining on how it happened with beric dondarrion still hanging around?
That's what I was getting at by saying so much would need to be reworked.
I mean... I guess you could have Melassandre do it?
Nope. That's stupid. Too much time has passed. You'd have to go back and tell the story of how it happened all those years ago. It just doesn't make any sense.
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Mon February 25, 2019 8:26 pm
by Norah
I think we can all agree that ship has sailed.
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Mon February 25, 2019 8:26 pm
by Monkey_Driven
cutuphalfdead wrote:I think we can all agree that ship has sailed.
Many moons ago.
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Mon February 25, 2019 8:26 pm
by Norah
But I still can't wait to see who plays Jon Connington this season.
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Tue February 26, 2019 3:37 am
by Bammer
What’s with the spoiler tags? I haven’t looked just in case - but you guys are obviously talking about Cersei giving birth to a dwarf. What’s the big deal, seriously.
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Tue February 26, 2019 1:28 pm
by @SkitchP
Is Daenerys fire proof tho
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Tue February 26, 2019 3:16 pm
by Simple Torture
@SkitchP wrote:Is Daenerys fire proof tho
She may not burn but those titties are on fire bro bwah bwahbwahbwahbwah
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Tue February 26, 2019 3:21 pm
by Chris_H_2
Today's The Ringer post was pretty good:
Will Howland Reed's Secrets Save the Day?
https://www.theringer.com/tv/2019/2/26/ ... a-jon-bran
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Tue February 26, 2019 3:26 pm
by Simple Torture
Edit: Good job beating me to this, Chris
Today's loose end is a good one: what role will Howland Reed play in Season 8?
https://www.theringer.com/platform/amp/ ... a-jon-bran
This piece lays out a nice summary of what we know about Meera and Jojen's father, but, honestly, I wonder if we'll ever see him on the show. Bran and Sam have laid out the facts of Jon's parentage and lineage as best they can, and while, sure, Howland could confirm it on another level, why would he need to? Would the people that would need convincing in order to recognize Jon as royalty--the leaders and lords of houses outside of the North--be likely to believe a frogeater who hid in the swamps during the War of the Five Kings? Or, to put it another way: would they have any reason to put more stock in his words than the words of an oath-breaking man of the Night's Watch (Sam the Pussy Slayer) and a mushroom-tripping cripple? If he does appear, I don't think he's going to serve as something like a grand revelation that allows Jon to gain legitimacy, but as something smaller but still important--a connection to the Ned/Robert generation that gets thinner and thinner every day.
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Tue February 26, 2019 3:55 pm
by Anders
Lots of options. I'm sure they will deliver, but hopefully they make some interesting choices, while staying true to whatever vision they have received from Martin. The books are clearly not up to date with the series now, and won't be by the time the series ends. But one last nod at the books wouldn't be a bad thing.
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Tue February 26, 2019 6:17 pm
by epilogue
Anders wrote: But one last nod at the books wouldn't be a bad thing.
