Red Mosquito

If there is no God, then how do you explain this?
http://www.strangerdimensions.com/2015/ ... worldline/

My world just turned upside down

How did you spell it? I always thought it was "stein". I need to know who the invaders of my universe are.

Bears of Future Past

It was definitely "stein," this is obviously a parallel universe situation

I always hated those fucking bears.

turned2black wrote:I always hated those fucking bears.

The Berenstein Bears or The Berenstain Bears?

BurtReynolds wrote:

Oh man, I forgot to mention that I watched O'Reilly's show before the debates. That was quite the flashback. He ended the night with this oddball gen of a quote:

LOL.

Carbon dating suggests ‘world’s oldest’ Koran could be older than the Prophet Muhammad

http://www.rawstory.com/2015/08/carbon- ... -muhammad/

turned2black wrote:LOL.

Carbon dating suggests ‘world’s oldest’ Koran could be older than the Prophet Muhammad

http://www.rawstory.com/2015/08/carbon- ... -muhammad/

LOL at the title, right?

"Carbon dating of a fragment from a Koran stored at a Birmingham library suggests that the book was produced between 568 and 645 A.D., said scientists at the University of Oxford..."

"Islamic scholars generally believe Muhammad lived between 570 and 632 A.D."

So, the REAL title of the article should be:
"Although we don't know muhammad's year of birth or death, carbon dating suggests the worlds oldest koran could have been produced before, during, or after muhammad's proposed life span."

Not quite the same ring, huh?

track11 wrote:

turned2black wrote:LOL.

Carbon dating suggests ‘world’s oldest’ Koran could be older than the Prophet Muhammad

http://www.rawstory.com/2015/08/carbon- ... -muhammad/

LOL at the title, right?

"Carbon dating of a fragment from a Koran stored at a Birmingham library suggests that the book was produced between 568 and 645 A.D., said scientists at the University of Oxford..."

"Islamic scholars generally believe Muhammad lived between 570 and 632 A.D."

So, the REAL title of the article should be:
"Although we don't know muhammad's year of birth or death, carbon dating suggests the worlds oldest koran could have been produced before, during, or after muhammad's proposed life span."

Not quite the same ring, huh?

The spiritual version of the Quran's creation story has the various passages taking the last few decades of his life to express, and not being compiled into a codex until after he died. So, no, it isnt a "gotcha" moment. It just makes that accepted timeline that much less likely to be correct. If anything, it's probably more akin to the sourcing of the pericope adulterae...just another reminder that religious history is more religion than history.

I'm about 63% sure this is God.....

Wrong.

wrong

wrong

BurtReynolds wrote:wrong

This might actually be the right answer.

i declare jihad on anyone who denies they are looking upon the face of God when they watch that.

BigRedLedbetter wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:wrong

This might actually be the right answer.

Aren't her boobs fake? God wouldn't need fake boobs.