Re: Election 2016
Posted: Wed November 02, 2016 4:43 pm
that's good, you should tweet it and get those RTs.
Wonderful
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/02/us/missis ... index.html
Just kill me. Lets get this over with.4/5 wrote:So Trump's gonna win this thing, huh?
Her slide started before the Comey letter on Friday.tragabigzanda wrote:Just looking at 538, what the hell happened to OH and AZ? OH had flipped for Clinton, and AZ was basically a toss up, but they are both polling for Trump now. Is the email thing really that compelling for people?
He does seem to be picking up Johnson/undecided voters while Hillary remains basically stagnant, yes.Monkey_Driven wrote:Isn't trump polling a little bit better because Johnson's numbers are way down?
It's actually from Chomsky's little known "An Introduction to Teaching Social Justice Activism to American Students". #FunFacts.McParadigm wrote:Are you sure that isnt a quote from Podesta's Secret Santa email invites?Bi_3 wrote:jwfocker wrote:I can't help but think people like 'Bloodagent' actually want the world to end. They all want to be Rick in Walking Dead.
Chomsky wrote:The bewildered herd is a problem. We've got to prevent their roar and trampling. We've got to distract them. They should be watching the Superbowl or sitcoms or violent movies. Every once in a while you call on them to chant meaningless slogans like "Support our troops." You've got to keep them pretty scared, because unless they're properly scared and frightened of all kinds of devils that are going to destroy them from outside or inside or somewhere, they may start to think, which is very dangerous, because they're not competent to think. Therefore it's important to distract them and marginalize them.
Didnt George W. Bush DUI thing come out the day before election day? There is still time for a video of trump killing and raping someone to come.4/5 wrote:He does seem to be picking up Johnson/undecided voters while Hillary remains basically stagnant, yes.Monkey_Driven wrote:Isn't trump polling a little bit better because Johnson's numbers are way down?
He wasn't ever that high nationwide. 538 had him as high as 9% with their weighted averages, but yeah he has been hemoraging support the last couple of weeks.tragabigzanda wrote:Yea, I think this is significant. Johnson was polling like 15% of the popular vote six weeks ago; he's at 4.7% now.Monkey_Driven wrote:Isn't trump polling a little bit better because Johnson's numbers are way down?
tragabigzanda wrote:This is true? I read that quote and thought "This sounds way too self-righteous to be Chomsky."Bi_3 wrote:It's actually from Chomsky's little known "An Introduction to Teaching Social Justice Activism to American Students". #FunFacts.McParadigm wrote:Are you sure that isnt a quote from Podesta's Secret Santa email invites?Bi_3 wrote:jwfocker wrote:I can't help but think people like 'Bloodagent' actually want the world to end. They all want to be Rick in Walking Dead.
Chomsky wrote:The bewildered herd is a problem. We've got to prevent their roar and trampling. We've got to distract them. They should be watching the Superbowl or sitcoms or violent movies. Every once in a while you call on them to chant meaningless slogans like "Support our troops." You've got to keep them pretty scared, because unless they're properly scared and frightened of all kinds of devils that are going to destroy them from outside or inside or somewhere, they may start to think, which is very dangerous, because they're not competent to think. Therefore it's important to distract them and marginalize them.