The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
Stickman
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10400
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:41 am
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by Stickman »

Awwww yeah

"I'll hold your wallet while you go fuck yourself"-David Letterman
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52025
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Hell yeah. Statham is back and stops the meg’s giant mouth with just one foot
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
JuanHamm
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6950
Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 6:10 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by JuanHamm »

I know it's not new, but I really don't like the trend of deliberately making bad movies. For a movie to fall into the "so bad it's good" category the film makers have to actually have been trying to make a good movie.
Nihilist lives don't matter
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51692
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by tragabigzanda »

Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sat January 10, 2026 1:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46239
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by BurtReynolds »

bada wrote:
Jorge wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Despite being one of the most popular Marvel series, Guardians 3 only took in $114 mil this weekend, compared to $142 mil for part 2. It's not entirely fair to compare the two, but it did fall slightly short of expectations regardless. I see nothing else in Marvel's lineup except Spider-man that is even close to the same popularity.
Good word of mouth will keep this one strong for a couple of weeks. At the very least, it won't have the monumental fall-off that Ant-Man 3 had (precisely due to negative word of mouth)
When you factor in ticket inflation which is sharply up over the last few years its pretty clear that Marvel has lost part of the audience. If they went by a tickets sold metric it would be incredibly obvious. I don't know if its superhero fatigue or if its Disney cause Lucasfilm and Pixar are struggling as well at the box office and TV ratings. Used to be a license to print money. Oversaturation is my guess and a string of underwhelming products. There's probably some taking the audience for granted. They'll watch anything with this label on it type of thing. GOTG 3 is one of the few recent releases I'm interested in from them I might see it next weekend. Indy V scares me to death but I'm at least curious. After that I don't know what they got worth getting excited about. The Little Mermaid remake will probably go a long way in finding out how much trouble they are in. If that underperforms it'll be a disaster.
Sadly it seems like the shitty live action remakes are the only things that are working for Disney right now. I hope LM bombs, but it probably won't.

Feels like putting Star Wars and Marvel shows on Disney+ was a bad idea.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12537
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by bada »

BurtReynolds wrote:
bada wrote:
Jorge wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Despite being one of the most popular Marvel series, Guardians 3 only took in $114 mil this weekend, compared to $142 mil for part 2. It's not entirely fair to compare the two, but it did fall slightly short of expectations regardless. I see nothing else in Marvel's lineup except Spider-man that is even close to the same popularity.
Good word of mouth will keep this one strong for a couple of weeks. At the very least, it won't have the monumental fall-off that Ant-Man 3 had (precisely due to negative word of mouth)
When you factor in ticket inflation which is sharply up over the last few years its pretty clear that Marvel has lost part of the audience. If they went by a tickets sold metric it would be incredibly obvious. I don't know if its superhero fatigue or if its Disney cause Lucasfilm and Pixar are struggling as well at the box office and TV ratings. Used to be a license to print money. Oversaturation is my guess and a string of underwhelming products. There's probably some taking the audience for granted. They'll watch anything with this label on it type of thing. GOTG 3 is one of the few recent releases I'm interested in from them I might see it next weekend. Indy V scares me to death but I'm at least curious. After that I don't know what they got worth getting excited about. The Little Mermaid remake will probably go a long way in finding out how much trouble they are in. If that underperforms it'll be a disaster.
Sadly it seems like the shitty live action remakes are the only things that are working for Disney right now. I hope LM bombs, but it probably won't.

Feels like putting Star Wars and Marvel shows on Disney+ was a bad idea.
Everything about Disney+ was a bad idea. As crazy as it is to say Sony are the only ones with brains. Make stuff and have other people pay you to put your content on their services instead of wasting money on your own streamer.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46239
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by BurtReynolds »

If I were them I would shift away from all the Avengers stuff and focus on a rebooted X-Men. There is tons of stuff to mine there.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12537
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by bada »

They are still trying to decide if the name X-Men is too problematic. I'm sure as soon as they figure out that pickle they'll be set to make a awesome movie.
User avatar
Farmer John
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6614
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 9:25 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by Farmer John »

This looks pretty cool. I've liked all of Yorgos Lanthimos' films that I've seen so far (still need to watch Dogtooth)

Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by Ms Harmless »

The Mario movie was everything it needed to be
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by Ms Harmless »

JuanHamm wrote:I know it's not new, but I really don't like the trend of deliberately making bad movies. For a movie to fall into the "so bad it's good" category the film makers have to actually have been trying to make a good movie.
this was my partner's critique of Renfield
User avatar
oasisfan35
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4783
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:07 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by oasisfan35 »

Ms Harmless wrote:
JuanHamm wrote:I know it's not new, but I really don't like the trend of deliberately making bad movies. For a movie to fall into the "so bad it's good" category the film makers have to actually have been trying to make a good movie.
this was my partner's critique of Renfield
Dropping all of Cage's films in to their own genre, especially since his financial fallout, is probably a fair idea.
absinthe makes the heart grow fonder...
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36766
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by Jorge »

Jorge wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Despite being one of the most popular Marvel series, Guardians 3 only took in $114 mil this weekend, compared to $142 mil for part 2. It's not entirely fair to compare the two, but it did fall slightly short of expectations regardless. I see nothing else in Marvel's lineup except Spider-man that is even close to the same popularity.
Good word of mouth will keep this one strong for a couple of weeks. At the very least, it won't have the monumental fall-off that Ant-Man 3 had (precisely due to negative word of mouth)
Pretty good. There will be a bigger dropoff next week with Fast X and The Little Mermaid opening but still looking at a good $800m+ finish
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 48511
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

Sad
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43426
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by VinylGuy »

Jorge wrote:
Jorge wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Despite being one of the most popular Marvel series, Guardians 3 only took in $114 mil this weekend, compared to $142 mil for part 2. It's not entirely fair to compare the two, but it did fall slightly short of expectations regardless. I see nothing else in Marvel's lineup except Spider-man that is even close to the same popularity.
Good word of mouth will keep this one strong for a couple of weeks. At the very least, it won't have the monumental fall-off that Ant-Man 3 had (precisely due to negative word of mouth)
Pretty good. There will be a bigger dropoff next week with Fast X and The Little Mermaid opening but still looking at a good $800m+ finish
yeah, really strong, specially being the third entry on the series too.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36766
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by Jorge »

I went to see it again last night and I am convinced it is the best Marvel movie
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43426
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by VinylGuy »

it might be yeah.
The first one was good too...and i think Winter Soldier is also very strong. But this one was super emotional too, a different type of movie for sure.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Rangi Guy
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9474
Joined: Fri March 22, 2013 7:20 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MistorKitty
Location: 41.1716° S, 174.8248° E

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by Rangi Guy »

Beetlejuice 2 coming - with original cast

https://consequence.net/2023/05/beetlej ... na-ortega/
"I really enjoy sandwiches but the other guys are so good at making sandwiches that I don't make them. Now I make sandwiches."
User avatar
Stickman
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10400
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:41 am
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by Stickman »

"I'll hold your wallet while you go fuck yourself"-David Letterman
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52025
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by E.H. Ruddock »



This looks promising
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
Post Reply