Re: Anybody want a Carano?™
Posted: Wed February 17, 2021 6:06 pm
How can you post such a violent, sexist image? Have you always hated women this much?dimejinky99 wrote:
... Also lame.surfndestroy wrote:How can you post such a violent, sexist image? Have you always hated women this much?dimejinky99 wrote:
surfndestroy wrote:How can you post such a violent, sexist image? Have you always hated women this much?dimejinky99 wrote:
I knowdimejinky99 wrote:I don’t.
Just no time for people like her who are cunts to other people.
Peeps wrote:i dont know if he hates women......
dimejinky99 wrote:cunts
cunts is used more regularly across the pond and is generally accepted by both men and women more so than classic B is used over hereB wrote:Peeps wrote:i dont know if he hates women......dimejinky99 wrote:cunts
dimejinky99 wrote:
Exhibit one million: a CPAC that is going to spend half its time bemoaning cancel culture cancelling a featured speaker for his tweets.McParadigm wrote:That’s a good question for all of us. I seriously doubt that it would be controversial if an actor was fired for posting a racist diatribe with a hideous slur in it on facebook. Or retweeted multiple Nazi-favoring Holocaust memes. Would anyone insist that a trans small business owner has an obligation to maintain the employment of a person who posts dehumanizing things about trans people online?Anders wrote:Where do you draw the line on controversial views?
The reality is, everyone understands that a social media ‘bridge too far’ does exist. This is, and has always been, just a debate over where that bridge ought to be placed.
I think you have to check the math, because the reporting I've seen is that 80% of the event will be 75% about 100% election security.McParadigm wrote:Exhibit one million: a CPAC that is going to spend half its time bemoaning cancel culture cancelling a featured speaker for his tweets.McParadigm wrote:That’s a good question for all of us. I seriously doubt that it would be controversial if an actor was fired for posting a racist diatribe with a hideous slur in it on facebook. Or retweeted multiple Nazi-favoring Holocaust memes. Would anyone insist that a trans small business owner has an obligation to maintain the employment of a person who posts dehumanizing things about trans people online?Anders wrote:Where do you draw the line on controversial views?
The reality is, everyone understands that a social media ‘bridge too far’ does exist. This is, and has always been, just a debate over where that bridge ought to be placed.
lol, yes. But also the theme is “America Uncanceled,” which is very funny.elliseamos wrote:I think you have to check the math, because the reporting I've seen is that 80% of the event will be 75% about 100% election security.McParadigm wrote:Exhibit one million: a CPAC that is going to spend half its time bemoaning cancel culture cancelling a featured speaker for his tweets.McParadigm wrote:That’s a good question for all of us. I seriously doubt that it would be controversial if an actor was fired for posting a racist diatribe with a hideous slur in it on facebook. Or retweeted multiple Nazi-favoring Holocaust memes. Would anyone insist that a trans small business owner has an obligation to maintain the employment of a person who posts dehumanizing things about trans people online?Anders wrote:Where do you draw the line on controversial views?
The reality is, everyone understands that a social media ‘bridge too far’ does exist. This is, and has always been, just a debate over where that bridge ought to be placed.
Oh man, yes. I wish people could just have an adult conversation about it and work it out as best we can.McParadigm wrote: The reality is, everyone understands that a social media ‘bridge too far’ does exist. This is, and has always been, just a debate over where that bridge ought to be placed.